Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 28 July 2008 16:15:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Stuart James Gornall Does anyone know if Occupational Dermatitis caused by Exposure to Nickel is Reportable under RIDDOR I am pretty sure that it is but looking at schedule 3 I can see no reference to Nickel The only bit that I thought could be relevant would be (s)any other known irritant or sensitising agent including in particular any chemical bearing the warning "may cause sensitisation by skin contact" or "irritating to the skin Many Thanks
Admin  
#2 Posted : 28 July 2008 16:23:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By PEP Definitely.
Admin  
#3 Posted : 28 July 2008 16:37:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By I. M. Twining I would agree. Occupational Dermatitis is just that, dermatitis which is caused by exposure to a workplace substance whether it be nickel, cement or whatever.
Admin  
#4 Posted : 01 August 2008 09:16:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Chris Packham Was the contact dermatitis diagnosed by a skin specialist (dermatologist) who had carried out the necessary patch test? If not, then be cautious. There are several thousand different skin diseases, many of which can look similar. Most of these will have no (or minimal) occupational significance. Frequently, when investigating suspected cases of occupational skin disease, I find that there are several contributory causes and that the initial assumption is often not correct. In fact, in one case what had been assumed to be latex allergy (with associated anaphylaxis) turned out to be "undifferentiated idiopathic somatoform anaphylaxis" (a purely psychological reaction not associated with chemical exposure at all). My understanding of RIDDOR is that reporting for skin problems is only required when there is a diagnosis of occupational contact dermatitis by a registered medical practitioner. Chris
Admin  
#5 Posted : 01 August 2008 09:39:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Chris Packham Just to add to my previous posting: I once had to investigate a case of occupational allergic contact dermatitis to nickel due to the worker handling nickel plated components. A simple test showed that the nickel in the plating was not bioavailable and thus could not have caused the skin reaction. Further investigation revealed that we were dealing with an irritant contact dermatitis (which can appear identical to an allergic reaction) from a non-occupational exposure. The patch test and diagnosis of sensitisation to nickel was medically correct but, in this case, irrelevant. Chris
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.