Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 01 September 2008 10:42:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By ian_f We have a situation where a CDM-C IMO is being unreasonable (some say pedantic!) and wanting to see all training records for all site personnel. IMO I think this only needs to key appointments from the Principal Contractor and may be some specialist sub-contractors, although even these will be gathered by the PC prior to works commencing to ensure persons are adequately trained. I also don't see the need for these to be included within the construction phase plan. He has even asked that training needs to include CDM awarenes? Thoughts anyone?
Admin  
#2 Posted : 01 September 2008 10:54:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By A Campbell Ian, Do you not present a H&S plan to the PC prior to contract start indicating minimum level of training given to people prior to starting work on site?
Admin  
#3 Posted : 01 September 2008 12:59:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ron Hunter ian_f: I'm guessing you are (or represent) the Principal Contractor? If so, then both you and the CDM-C were appointed by the Client, and it is to him you should get back to in order to resolve the issue. I am generally supportive of your view. Whilst the CDM-C must be in a position to ADVISE the Client and the Principal Contractor of the competency of their appointments, such issues should be properly addressed at the Stage 1 pre-qualification and tender stages. If you are at, or are mobilising for, the construction phase of the Project, then it is a bit late for such detailed enquiries - unless the Client has a particular and specific concern?
Admin  
#4 Posted : 01 September 2008 13:43:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Tony abc jprhdnMurphy I had a similar request from a CDMC who was trying to make a name for himself. I wrote to him with a list of names of everybody who was due on site and told him that it was his job to check their competency levels, not mine, and therefore he was more than welcome to follow this through the project. I also pointed out that, inside our CPP it clearly stated that organisational appointments would be subject to our QA system. it did not mention individual competency checks. He soon backed off
Admin  
#5 Posted : 01 September 2008 13:47:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By ian_f Ron, I agree and thx! to start stage 1 and 2 competenacey aseessments at the stage we are at on our domestic sub-contractor is incompetant IMO. We are PC and am in a term contract with client, who is also CDM-C! just to confuse issues! We have stated that operatives will be trained/certificated where copies will be in held in the site safty file and will need to be presented at site induction if not already etc etc.
Admin  
#6 Posted : 01 September 2008 15:40:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ron Hunter Have to wonder what a "CDM Awareness" course might be, and what relevance a knowledge of (e.g.) Regulation 11 of CDM 2007 would have to a brickie's labourer! By all means make these records avaiable on Site if you choose to, but there's certainly no need to have all that in the CPP.
Admin  
#7 Posted : 01 September 2008 15:51:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ali ..also the CDM_C must be competent himself. Ever thought of challenging him ? You are entitled to. Also Reg 20 requires him to "take all reasonable steps...." which does not give him the power to demand unlike the HSE ! Some of them even look down on HSE inspectors, but to me they are simply glorified tick box admin people with NO H&S qualfications. In fact H&S qualifications is not even a pre-requisite !!
Admin  
#8 Posted : 01 September 2008 16:08:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By ian_f Ali...harsh; I have met some very good and practicable ones (not a lot in a Paul Daniels stylie!) Amazing I am dealing with a MaPS...how the heck they receiced this I dont understand!
Admin  
#9 Posted : 01 September 2008 16:33:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ali Point taken thanks !! I used to be an ex EHO and have had my fair share of "bad" experiences with them.
Admin  
#10 Posted : 01 September 2008 16:33:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ron Hunter Not only harsh, also inaccurate. CDM-C does require H&S credentials - see Appendix 5 of the CDM ACoP L144.
Admin  
#11 Posted : 01 September 2008 20:11:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Crim Ali, I'm interested in you used to be an ex EHO? I thought once you are ex something you are always ex that something unless you return to that area of work? Facetious or what? The CDM-C has a duty to recommend the P C's competence to the Client. The P C has a duty to competence check the sub-contractors and all other site operatives. If you have completed those checks and have nothing to hide why not invite the CDM-C to your office so that he/she can see your checks? Copy the Client inon your invitation so that they can see where their money is going. Otherwise just tell the CDM-C you have carried out your duties under CDM 07 if there is still a problem then speak to the Client. I know there are some CDM-C's who just create extra work for themselves in order to add to their fee.
Admin  
#12 Posted : 02 September 2008 08:41:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Robert K Lewis Unless the requirement has been placed in the contract I would smile sweetly and talk of personal and confidential data under Data Protection. It really is becoming a big issue as even many of the pre-quals I have seen are looking for this personal information. I have had in training records, in the recent past, information including remedial reading. I am not going to permit my employees being exposed to this sort of inquisition. A list of courses and a programme should be sufficient. We are assessing the competence of the organisation and this does not mean that we have to be so intrusive into the lives of employees unless it is actually necessary. At this point we can get specific employee authorisation if it is justified. Bob
Admin  
#13 Posted : 02 September 2008 13:11:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Steve T. To Ian_f I am a CDM-C for a large CDM project and agree with comments from others that the that this CDM-C is going over the top. He is entitled to ask for evidence that you comply with paragraphs 193 to 240 and following tables of CDM 2007 ACOP. Good luck
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.