Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 06 February 2009 21:27:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Merv Newman What a topical thread : http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/7874587.stm All the for and against. I remember our deputy head inviting a whole class to throw at him while he took photos. Not one hit him. But some great B/W photos.(1958 ?) Should it be banned during working time/on employer's premises ? Or could it be considered in the same light as paint-balling or other such "team-building" exercises ? Someone chucks one at me, I chuck a few back. Note : you can't make a decent snow ball while wearing woolly gloves. Leather or bare skin. (later preferred to really get that seasonal spirit and limit how much balls you can produce)(maybe that should be in the AUG (no typing in woolly gloves as it could violate the spirit of this forum)) Am I wandering, dithering or just dribbling ? Merv
Admin  
#2 Posted : 06 February 2009 21:40:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By D H Hi Merv - glad to see you are well recovered - throwing snowballs - at your age? at your age? young man! Witnessed a road closure yesterday when a group of kids were throwing snowballs at cars and the young lady driver got such a fright she lost control of the car and she ended up sideways in the middle of the road on the five inches of snow accumulated there. I came from 4 cars behind to see if I could help - no one else went to her aid!! - and found her panicking and spinning her wheels. Spoke to her and lots of tears then ensued. Took her car into the side and parked her up and went to retrieve my own car - to a chorus of horns etc for "abandoning" my car on a "clear road. Responsible and caring fellow motorists?? Parked up beside the woman and she did not recognise me immediately as the person who had 2 minutes before, had driven her car to safety. So - in all that - ban snowballs?? No - but people be prepared - if you are passing kids with snow on the road - please be prepared for it?? We all did it at some time - come on admit it. Dave
Admin  
#3 Posted : 06 February 2009 22:17:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Eliza Flutterby Loved this reaction to the article: Firstly complete a risk assessment form (preferably in triplicate) and submit it to the Health and Safety department of your local council. Deal with their response (typically with questions such as - age of snow, whether it was fresh or had been previously used as a snow ball, size and capacity, age of persons at whom it will be thrown, whether the recipients had received parental permission to participate in a snowball fight, together with an indemnity form). After three months you will receive a certificate for permission to throw a snowball or balls strictly in accordance with the terms and conditions outlined on the form and as soon as the appropriate licence fee has been paid for and received. In order to ensure the certificate arrives in time it's best to submit it three months in advance and establish a hotline for permission to vary. Then you will be able to throw the snowball back. P Thomas, St Helens Back in the real world.... Had a massive snowball fight at work, involving me and another union H&S rep, delivery driver (who is also an H&S rep) and various other colleagues. We had a laugh, nobody got hurt, it was a bit of morale (although my hair was TOTALLY ruined lol) I won. Chucking snowballs at moving vehicles is not a good idea - however, my bloke is an LGV driver and he said it made a change from the usual bricks..... All the best and happy fighting!! Eliza With The Sticky-Up Hair
Admin  
#4 Posted : 06 February 2009 23:46:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By D H Eliza- may I ask why you have sticky up hair??# Is it of fear of snowballs - or the effect of snowballs hitting and freezing? Or something else - anticipation? Electromagnets? Love? Dave
Admin  
#5 Posted : 07 February 2009 00:03:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Graham Bullough I probably write for all of us in commending DH for helping the young lady driver as he describes. However, as for his assertion that all of us have chucked snowballs at vehicles sometime, I have to disagree. Even as feckless teenagers, my friends and I didn't do so - because it's downright stupid and inconsiderate. The other night I drove past some yobbos who were pelting passing vehicles with snowballs. I got a bit of a fright, but was otherwise okay and thankful that my car windows remained intact. However, the yobbos could have caused considerable harm if they had bombarded a vehicle driven by a nervous driver or perhaps an elderly one with a dodgy heart! From time to time when out in non-soggy snow conditions I enjoy a consensual snowball fight just like most people do. However, anyone who chucks snowballs at non-consenting people or vehicles surely is just being a thug! Have a good weekend. If you've got ample snow in your area, enjoy it if you are able to do so at leisure, perhaps with some good snowball fights! Come to think of it: Should snowballers wear goggles? In view of the potential for eye injuries, perhaps snowballing cannot be regarded as the new conkers. However, if basic etiquette (to quote the title of the newspaper article) is observed - i.e. avoid using hard balls of icy/soggy snow, and aim balls at people's bodies and away from their heads - then no need for goggles methinks.
Admin  
#6 Posted : 07 February 2009 10:31:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By tinkicker Hi all. I'm a newbie on here with a fairly new NEBOSH General and have just been made Health and Safety Advisor for my company in addition to my other duties. So advice from those more experienced H&S men will be appreciated. Had a snowball incident at work on Thursday. I work for a company specialising in educating young persons who have been kicked out of mainstream education for unreasonable and disruptive behaviour and kicked out of the reception centre to deal with them for the same reason. We are the last chance saloon, so we tend to get the worst of the worst. Thursday, I spotted a group of youths having a snowball fight in the car park. Ok lets move them onto our 9 acres of parkland to play well away from the cars. No problem. I asked a tutor nearby to move them and he replied "we are only playuing snowballs" picked up a lump of icy snow and hurled it at a students head, he missed. I put a stop to it and gave the tutor a rollocking. Although I felt a spoilsport, my concerns were: If the tutor is engaged in the fight, it becomes a company sanctioned activity. If the tutor had the kids eye out and the HSE got involved they would most likely conclude: 1. The tutor was in breach of his duty of care in causing the injury. (£20K fine) 2. The tutor failed to carry out a risk assessment. (£20k fine) 3. The tutor failed to supply appropriate PPE and the student was injured as a result (£20k fine). 4. The company would have to rack up massive legal fees in trying to defend the case (£££££). 5. The company would be wide open for the victim to pursue damages (££££££). 6. Legal fees defending the case (£££££). 7. Doing what we do means that we have a big problem getting public and employee liability insurance. Only one company will insure us and should they have to pay out by what could be seen as dereliction of duty by an employee, then they may decline to re insure when the expiry date arrives. We would then have to close our doors. This new duty is purely voluntary, not getting paid any more dosh for it and as a newbie the responsibility is weighing pretty heavily. Its a case of doing the work for free now and hopefully the company does well and I reap the rewards later. I just want to get it right and help the company grow. So am I been a little anal about it all, or was I justified in giving the rollocking? All comments gratefully received.
Admin  
#7 Posted : 07 February 2009 12:34:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Eliza Flutterby Dave I could tell you, but it's a secret :-)
Admin  
#8 Posted : 09 February 2009 07:25:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Flic Tinkicker, please see the following: http://www.hse.gov.uk/myth/dec08.htm Flic
Admin  
#9 Posted : 09 February 2009 08:12:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Peter F Tinkicker and graham, are your replies a wind up, I am a H&S Advisor and sat wanting the snow to stick so i could go out with the kids to play snowball fights, build snowmen and sledge. I worked in secure units for years and we'd play in the snow all day given the opportunity. Stopping tutors etc engaging with the young people in this way stops relationships being formed and reinforces the negative attitude that young people have of people in so called authority. Tinkicker you also claim you gave the tutor a rollicking, so playing snowballs not accepted, bullying and being aggressive towards staff is. It's about time you got in the real world, common sense surely should prevail.
Admin  
#10 Posted : 10 February 2009 10:45:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Mike DF In defence of Tinkicker it is not clear what the surface of the car park was. If it is smooth tarmac then let the snowball fight go ahead, no point in standing in the way of spontaneous harmless fun. If the car park is surface with pebbles /stones then move to the park land. Never mind the students, I would not like my car being struck by friendly fire snowballs loaded with pebbles!
Admin  
#11 Posted : 11 February 2009 11:07:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By tinkicker Thanks for your comments, all have been taken on board. In my defence. Yes the car park is crushed stone and the snow was not fresh it was frozen ice. However I suspected I was been a little anal, never being called a bully before though! Just trying to look at it through the HSE's eyes if the instructor threw a lump of "snow" and had a kids eye out though in the circumstances prescribed. I have well developed "blind eye" when the tutors are engaging their staff, the problem was when the tutor refused to take the fight to an area where bystanders and property could not be damaged. I did ask reasonably in the first instance and got a lot of lip in return. I put these kids on powerful motorcycles and get them to ride over mud, boulders, tree roots and very steep, muddy hills, put welding equipment and power tools in their hands, so am not anal about banning everything, however I understand the risks and requirements of this, so I don't sweat it. Just did not understand the implications of a service user getting injured directly by the actions of a member of staff in a spontaneous work activity, which is why I asked for advice. Did not have any problems whatsoever with the kids themselves snowballing, it was the possible implications of the tutor hurling missiles at the kids that worried me. I still don't understand these implictions. Many thanks again for your constructive advice.
Admin  
#12 Posted : 11 February 2009 11:18:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Boh Graham Bullough et al, has the great and spectacular machine of evolution really bore presence to such docile and boring produce. Surely you post in jest? I personally would love to pelt you with snow balls, I may even consider sleet. Are you the guy off that Channel 4 programme who brushes his driveway? The stigma attached to our profession is born straight from your good selves. I for one am happy to see a younger and more sensible culture coming through in the world of risk management, 10 out of 10 to some of the articles in SHP recently on graduates in our profession and their refreshing outlook. A refreshing change to some of the dross that can be found and I commend the editors.
Admin  
#13 Posted : 11 February 2009 11:34:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By tinkicker At last I have an experienced viewpoint! Thank You! As I said, I am new to this game, have a reasonably freshly minted Nebosh General and have only had the attitude of my lecturer to go on. I have been thrown in very much at the deep end, no one has been H&S advisor before at my company, they just rolled along from one crisis to another. My lecturer was very anal in his attitude and analysis of risk. I just figured that is what is required of an H&S advisor, after all he is the teacher and I am the student. I half suspected that I was going a little over the top and now I have a little humble pie to eat at the next management meeting.
Admin  
#14 Posted : 11 February 2009 12:23:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Philjimman I like this link http://www.hse.gov.uk/myth/dec08.htm Phil
Admin  
#15 Posted : 11 February 2009 13:37:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Merv Newman Tinkicker (we all want to do that sometime) et al. In my opinion Tinkicker had no right or authority to stop this activity. He, (she ?)(can't see that. Girls don't kick tins, do they ?) is employed, as most of us are, in an advisory capacity. That means that we can advise managers, supervisors, employees etc that an activity, planned or in progress, could be dangerous. Persons so advised will then decide for themselves if they accept that advice or not. One may permits oneself a rather strong "Oi !" but that's about it. Accepted or not, make a note of giving such advice in your diary or log. You may need to defend yourself in court at a later date. Discuss Merv
Admin  
#16 Posted : 12 February 2009 10:55:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By tinkicker Thanks Merv and the other contributors, your feedback is gratefully received. I accept that I have acted like an anally retentive, jumped up little *rick in this instance and it will not happen again. I was quick to jump in with my opinions on other fora; esp about the school teacher who dressed his pupils up like Star Wars Stormtroopers just to have a game of conkers, yet I too have fallen into the trap, although in my defence, the situation was a little more complicated than acting as an advisor, I will explain: My H&S role is but a minor part of my duties, one of my many other roles is as a middle manager of the company, so the lines are not as clear cut as it would seem, I have an advisory capacity where H&S expenditure and major policy changes at director level are concerned, but also autonomy and authority to address any problems that occur in other areas, departments and with subordinate members of staff. Asking (nicely) for a tutor to stop the students throwing snowballs at staff and customer's cars in the car park and move to an area well away to prevent possible property damage was the primary reason for my intervention ( I am a fully qualified motor vehicle tech with over 20 years experience and have seen many cars damaged by "snowballs" over the years). For him to dismiss my request, pick up a snowball and launch it a student himself was blatent disregard for authority. The tutor has an history of such actions with other managers and is on a final warning for such. This is what I gave him the rollocking for. I used the H&S route as a tool for trying to make him see that every action has consequence and try to instill a need to apply a little forethought before getting into a situation and therefore improve his performance. I am not prepared to give up on him yet as he is actually quite good with the kids, just a little (a lot) daft. My original post was to gain a little feedback as to whether using the H&S route was a valid excuse, what other H&S people with more experience than I thought of the consequences of a member of staff snowballing his pupils and thus gaining a valuable lesson in the process. I received a well deserved mauling and this has reinforced my view that the H&S route was perhaps not the best course of action, but still preferrable to writing a guy on his last warning up for insubordination and entering due process. My management style is generally easy going and friendly, trained in and following the holistic school of thought and to be told I was a bully was a little disconcerting. One thing I am not is a bully. Just trying to do my best and get the balance right. Thanks all for another trouser seat polishing, but invaluable lesson from the University of Hard Knocks and Humble Pie. Kindest regards Mark
Admin  
#17 Posted : 12 February 2009 13:32:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Peter F So it appears that Health and Safety's name was used yet again for an ineffective manager whilst other options where open to him, i.e dealing with the persons behaviour. If the person refuses to comply then as a manager you have other measures open to you. or was using health and safety the easy option. This is why local authorities will quote health and safety stopped this that or the other because they will not take responsibility for dealing with the issue or person direct.
Admin  
#18 Posted : 12 February 2009 13:33:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Peter F Tinkicker it ppears that u as a manager have 'snowballs'
Admin  
#19 Posted : 12 February 2009 14:12:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Sheila EJ Keogh My kids had a great time toboganning in the snow! Huge fun.
Admin  
#20 Posted : 12 February 2009 14:36:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Peter F Don't beat yourself up to much, if we didn't do anything we'd never learn.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.