Rank: Guest
|
Posted By naomi Hi All
Hoping some one can help me out here and point me in the right direction in regards to documentation.
If a building is leased from a Landlord and the building is shared by two separate companies, who is responsible for the maintenance? In particular Emergency Lighting, Fire Alarm System, Fire Extinguishers.
Where would I find this info?
Thanks in advance Naomi
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By BPF Naomi,
I would say the first place to look would be the lease agreement the companies have in place.
BPF
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By paulw71 It would depend on what was agreed in the tenancy documents.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By CFT I agree with both of the above responses; Heads of terms to issue of lease gives the opportunity to discuss what is to be, and what is not.
This not withstanding does leave the landlord responsible for communal areas and in many cases quite a bit of the general fabric such as boilers, fixed AC, utilities, etc. There is no real rule of thumb with this type of letting, they are rarely 'fully maintaining fully repairing.'
From a financial standpoint only, service charges often identify what is included that you pay for on a not for profit basis and as per RICS guidelines.
Contact me by all means, if you wanted to chew over what has prompted you to post Naomi.
CFT
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By TonyB Let's put this into a legal context.
The duty (from Section 4 HSWA) lies with the controller of the premises. The default position is the landlord in a leased property - which is why section 4 is often referred to as the 'landlord's duty'.
However, unlike almost all other aspects of H&S law - accountability and therefore responsibility CAN be transferred by contract. That's why the comments above relating to checking the lease agreement. If the lease agreement clearly states that one or more tenants take on the role of the controller of premises (or words of a similar nature) then they have taken on the duties under section 4. If this is not in the contract then the duty rests with the landlord.
In general a decent rule of thumb would be to ask 'If the roof developed a leak - who would get it fixed?' That person would be the controller of premises.
Hope it helps,
Tony.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By D H Agree with Tony - at the end of the day the responsibility will be shared.
For example, if the landlord fails in his responsibility to maintain systems such as fire alarms, would the tenant not still have a duty of care to his employees in the event of fire?
If joined tenancy, speak to the other tenant and get agreed plans drawn up. You do not want the other tenants activities impacting on your own safety systems and procedures
Dave
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By shyjukr Depents upon the agreement.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By GaryC40 I would not necessary agree that it just depends on the agreement.
Would Fire Safety Law would not take primacy over HSAWA in terms of the need to carry out a FRA and the shared responsibility that entails. The premise is that the responsibility for fire safety is proportionate to the level of control. The landlord needs to demonstrate that the building is safe and is subject to audit by the Fire Service, not HSE. Also for insurance purposes, as the fire certificate is now abolished. It would be reasonable to suggest that the landlord will always retain some element control over the building.
We lease out 74 business units and our insurance company demanded an up to date FRA with input from all parties.
There is certainly no onus for the landlord alone to provide Fire Fighting Appliances (in Scotland)
This is where the lease terms comes into play. And of course Fire Safety is just one aspect.
There is a new requirement for landlords to provide an EPC Energy Performance Cert with all new tenancy agreements.
Sorry prob not much help!
GC
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By naomi Thanks for all your input.
I have had a look at the terms of contract and it is slightly woolly on who is responsible for maintaining systems such as boiler, external, fire systems.
Think I will have to get the contract looked over by a professional, thanks for all your help.
Naomi
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By DJ I agree with much of what has been said already. It will all come down to what is contained in the lease/tenancy agreement.
Regards.
DJ
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By peter gannaway I agree with most of what has gone before, but in the absence of anything formal written down, my experience of fire brigade in these situations(although as with other things in FSO things do differ from area to area), the rule is who gets most benefit from the income. If the landlord is receiving a small ground rent and the lessee has full maintenance and gets the lion share of the earned income, then they will probably be pursued.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By srd
We have recently let a sports ground and building to another company.
Do we need to leave the fire extinguishers in the building, or is it up to the new tenant to provide his own.
At the moment the fire detection system is linked to an external monitoring company who notify the fire services if a fire is detected. Are we OK to cancel this contract and leave the new tenant to arrange his own monitoring?
The new tenant will be the sole occupier of the whole building and grounds.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Bob Youel don't forget the environmental and other laws aspects
Its complicated ain't it!
As with the other postings I advise you to look look at the T&C's of your tenancy
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By marcusblack Agree with most of what has been written regarding terms of the lease. I do allot of work for landlords and managing agents for multi occupied buildings. Under the RRO where the tenancy is a workplace the Responsible Person is the employer (i.e. the tenant) if the workplace is to 'any extent under their control'. In very general terms the landlord will be responsible for common areas, common plant or common systems and where any of these are present there will be the duty to 'co-operate and co-ordinate'. Landlords are rarely responsible for any provisions within the tenant's demise such as emergency lighting. However, common systems such as a fire alarm the landlord will be responsible for its maintenance and testing even in tenanted areas.
Hope this helps, if not feel free to email me.
Mark
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Crim I had some of this recently with a fire risk assessment on ground floor under a first floor occupied flat.
Someone pointed to the "person in control of the premises" as being responsible. (Whoever that is at the time).
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.