Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 18 March 2009 10:19:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By beenus Good morning all. We have some fixed wired machinery which is regularly serviced and maintained as required by PUWER. However, my question is how does our need to comply with PUWER fit in with the electricity requirement for fixed wired equipment to be regularly checked? The current process requires that all fixed wiring is checked every 5 years. On reading the report recently I noticed that only 10% of the fixed wired equipment is tested, with the assumption (I'm told by the competent person) that if this is okay then everything else is okay. Although the checking of the fixed wiring is to comply with EAW does this also form part of the overall PUWER requirements in terms of servicing and maintenance? And, should I be asking for this equipment to be separately identified for the fixed wiring check every 5 years? I hope this all makes sense.
Admin  
#2 Posted : 18 March 2009 10:45:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Dave Daniel "Fixed wiring" as per IEE wiring regs does NOT include process machinery whether wired in by plug and socket or busbars etc. The "Wiring Regulations" scope does not go beyond the electrical distribution system. I've come across this fallacy before as well as the one that it's a "legal requirement" that any plug and socket connected kit is "portable" and requires PAT testing whereas if you connect it via a fixed fused outlet, it doesn't. In fact there are NO legal requirements for electrical testing - the IEE "Regs" are a trade code, not a Statutory Instrument and PAT testing is a custom and practice arising from a misinterpretation of legislation, so you can choose to apply the guidance sensibly an responsibly. PUWER does have a general requirement for essentially basic mechanical inspection of plant and equipment whose scope has never been really clarified properly but this is entirely different.
Admin  
#3 Posted : 18 March 2009 11:09:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By beenus Thanks for your information and clarification Dave but what then is my position on getting the fixed wired machinery (3 phase, 420 v) checked? Would this come under the PUWER requirement and if so would a 5 year interval be sufficient do you know?
Admin  
#4 Posted : 18 March 2009 18:22:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By TonyB Hi, Good to see that the myths have been clarified so early in a thread. In general, it is good practice to have the electrics on fixed machinery checked at the same frequency as the fixed wiring in the building. Therefore, 5 years is adequate in most circumstances. The only exception is where conditions are such that it is foreseeable that the damage in more likely to occur in specific sections, and therefore the risk of 'danger' is greater. Like all good things - its down to risk assessment and competence. All the best, Tony.
Admin  
#5 Posted : 19 March 2009 08:36:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By beenus Many thanks, I feel more able to make my recommendations now.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.