Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 18 March 2009 14:15:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By PMW
I have 2 engineers working on a 6m mobile scaffold. (both PASMA trained, experienced and competent and with outriggers etc) - don't panic! The MC insists on use of harnesses & a certificate to be provided. Our MS and RA's were accepted with no mention of Harness use or certificates. Also the MC is not requesting any proof that the engineers are trained to use harnesses (which they are or specifing where they should harness on to? Also no request for RA for harness either? All rather frustrating.

My questions is what sort of certificate do you think he wants? I am tempted just to buy new to save the hassle.

All constructive responses welcomed.

Pauline

Admin  
#2 Posted : 18 March 2009 16:22:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ali
Harnesses fall under the PPE Regs 1992 and Work at Height Regs 2005 - both indicate a need for inspection. HSE guidance can be found in Indg367, explaining the inspection regime. I imagine the competenmt perosn inspecting this would issue some kind of report. If on hire then the hiring company would need to inspect .
Admin  
#3 Posted : 18 March 2009 16:33:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By A Campbell
>>> Scratching head of what is the requirement to justify wearing a harness... attach to a tower scafold system... will this hold the force of a 16 stone bloke falling???
Admin  
#4 Posted : 18 March 2009 16:35:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By PMW
MC has not clarified where engineer is to clip on to??? No obvious safe and secure point above head height. I agree, if you clip onto a mobile tower, then fall, you will pull it onto you.
Admin  
#5 Posted : 19 March 2009 11:33:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By WayneF
Hi Pauline
We are having a similar situation with the insurance company. We have been advised that 'casual climber' training will surfice. Amazed that training providers do not have to be accredited to a regulatory body, though I believe there is a BS standard that escapes me at the moment to which it should comply.
Admin  
#6 Posted : 19 March 2009 11:41:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By A Campbell
At the early stages of the work at height regs.... My old employer initiated a safe roof access training which involved use of harness, restraint & fall protection equipment, assessment training.

It was developed in conjunction with the national access & rescue centre in Cumbria.... included train the trainer course as well as contents and was excellent in advice.

You could try them or similar, especially if looking at a lot of work at height?
Admin  
#7 Posted : 19 March 2009 11:42:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Dave Merchant
Wayne - you're thinking of BS8454.

It's no surprise WAH trainers don't need to be "accredited to a regulatory body" as there isn't one. Never has been, probably never will be.

Basic climber training (aka 'casual' or 'occasional') would *only* be suitable if the training addresses the specifics of climbing on scaffolding structures. The standard courses assume the structure is permanent and loadbearing (steelwork, radio masts, etc.) and the issues of anchoring to scaffold are entirely different. Clip in the wrong place and you'll hit the ground moments before the tower does.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.