Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Jason McQueen
Can anyone clarify the training requirements for the use of MEWP's? I was under the impression that any training could be provided by any training agency in relation to MEWP's providing that it ensured the competence of the operators.
However, reading the HSE Construction Information Sheet N0 58, it states 'All MEWP operators sohuld have attended a recognised operator training course. On successful completion of the course they wil receive a certificate, card or licence, eg IPAF's Powered Access Licence or Construction Skills CPCS card...'
Now to me the use of the word recognised here is key and steers the requirements firmly towards IPAF or CPCS and suggests that any training provided by A.N.Other will be deemed as inappropriate due to it not being 'recognised' should it ever be called into question. This eliminates many smaller training providers who could quite possibly deliver as good, if not better training themselves.
Also, having received quotes from both IPAF and a local trainer who delivers our RTITB forklift trainer who can also provide MEWP training in scissor and boom type platforms, the cost is ten fold. Obviously I would have to ensure that the course content from the local provider is adequate but other than that, wheres the issues?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Juan Carlos Arias
As far as I know a RTITB qualified instructor will be able to train people on MEWPs as long as he has attended the course (as an operator)and has a valid licence for it.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Jason McQueen
That was my thinking too. Provided the instructor and the content was competent/relevant/applicable, where is the problem?
Its just a bit offputting when the offical documentation steers you towards one specific provider. Or is this a case of the HSE would like you to use one of these organisations but couldnt actually enforce it or have any real come back providing, as I posted, the content and instructor was competent.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By A Campbell
Jason,
Many construction sites stipilate IPAF training, but if it's for your own needs only then not a big problem with regards to costing.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Jason McQueen
No, its only for on site authorisation. I appreciate that construction sites would be different. Where you can have many subs on site, it makes sense to have and stipulate one standard.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By SteveD-M
Agree with the above I would tho' do some checking as to the trainers ability to weather a claim should tyhe brown stuff hit the fan...
Professional indemnity etc...
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.