Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 23 April 2009 09:43:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By AlH
I feel sad today after getting over the 'May contain nuts' debacle. Then read in the paper today about the H&S Advisor who has stopped a clown from wearing clown shoes. How far do we go to make a performace safe? No one wants to go back to the days were a stunt double falling off a building was a weighted dummy!

http://www.telegraph.co....o-health-and-safety.html
Admin  
#2 Posted : 23 April 2009 09:48:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Yossarian
What I want to know, is how did they conclude it was the shoes that were the problem rather than the high-wire, hoop of fire, drum-kit, trumpet or double-bass?

That said, it would have been a heck of a RIDDOR to investigate!

At least the insurers didn't insist on a hard hat this time.
Admin  
#3 Posted : 23 April 2009 11:05:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By srd
Apparently he broke the metatarsal bone in his left foot.

Does this mean that we should now also ban football, as this can result in similar injuries?

Steve.
Admin  
#4 Posted : 23 April 2009 11:14:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By A Campbell
It's the old adage...
Are we in this position to stop people from doing their job or to support what they do and improve/reduce the likelihood of them hurting themselves?

How many times have you heard the comment.... been told I can't do that because of H&S?
Admin  
#5 Posted : 23 April 2009 11:39:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Yossarian
Having read all the related articles the search engine throws up, I note it is only the Australian Courier Mail that picks up that it is the insurers who insist on smaller shoes.

Check it out on:

http://www.news.com.au/c...25374131-5013016,00.html

Reminds me of the Black Adder episode Duel & Duality where similar insurance restrictions applied.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.