Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Lwood
Scenario:
There are a number of dikes/land drains to be cleared and a further number(unspecified)to be excavated using a Medium Tracked Excavator. The work will take 2 men an expected 8 weeks worth of work (no this is not a GCSE question).
Aside from the time taken to do the work, is the task in its own right a CDM task? What I am asking revolves round the issue of farm work, is it outside CDM?
I have my own thoughts, but am seeking comments from the floor please.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Dave Daniel
Lwood:
I don't think this work falls within CDM. To do so, you have to be excavating to build a "structure". You are just engaged in agricultural work by the sounds of it.
I know a "structure" can include "earthworks" and "drainage works" but I would argue that you could technically argue that banking up your spuds could be an "earthwork", and I can recall digging "drainage works" on the beach with my bucket and spade very many years ago!
In my view you should sensibly argue that CDM is supposed to apply where you employ builders and engage in major drainage work, rather than agricultural contractors. Remember we live in a time of sensible realism not pedantry.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Richard Altoft
definitely IS CDM. See Acop and definition of structure in Regs.
R
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Ron Hunter
IMHO this would seem to fit the CDM definition of "construction work".
In reality though is this going to add a burden or complexity?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Paul
Sounds like it is CDM to me, the activity that you have described falls under the regs regardless if it is on a farm or not.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By clairel
From my experience of farmers, you tell a farmer clearing ditches is reportable and they will mutter and it will just get done when no one's looking anyway. I'm more interested in getting them to do the job safely TBH.
As to whether it 'technically' applies. Well IMO the definition of construction work seems to apply to just about everything nowadays and I don't think it was really supposed to do that.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Phil Rose
Lwood
sorry my first post was meant to be helpful but I could have perhaps been more so. I think your question in which you mentioned the length of time of the work, was really asking whether the work was notifiable under CDM. I have looked at the definitions pretty closely and I would certainly NOT go so far as suggesting that the regs definitely apply.
If the work you are intending to do is merely clearing 'ditches', then I would not consider that this would come under CDM, unless you consider the 'ditches' as structures. I personally don't think that the regs were intended to apply to the scenario that you have outlined.
In saying that, you do of course need to manage any significant risks and bearing in Ron's post, it isn't a huge additional burden to apply the regs (although I don't think they apply or that you need to notofy). While I have been writing this Claire has also posted and I think we are on similar wave lengths.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Lwood
I did say that I had my own thoughts on the subject and having had comments from the above (many thanks all)I think I will set out my own thinking:
Firstly, I did read the regulations along with the guidance and whilst they did indicate that it could be construction, I suspect that the HSE would not be too troubled if we did not report it. I thought of other industries that move materials using plant such as scrap yards, sugar refineries, waste tips and green composting sites. My thinking was that they move materials as part of the work and the primary aim is not construction and in this case the primary aim is to maintain the land and not construct. After all, a ditch is a waste of land to a farmer if the land could be drained without a ditch they would be very happy!
Secondly, would the reporting of the task in any way improve the hazard and risk management, to my mind no. However, We do have very good RA's our record is very good for H&S management, its taken seriously hence the discussion and not simply shaking the head.
Lastly and possibly the most telling, the HSE do separate farming and construction in its action teams, its reporting and in its guidance notes. Therefore, whilst they and we consider farming to be a risky operation they do treat it separately from construction.
Ergo et sum, I will probably not report it as CDM unless one of our HSE enforcement officers uses this forum to advise me otherwise!
L
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Dave Daniel
LWood: I think your plan is sound. This issue came up years ago in the Motor Industry, in the context of installing machinery - and some automated production lines are very big. In the 1994 CDM Regulations machinery erection seemed to fall within "Construction work" although on asking the HSE I seem to recall Rover Group received a rather obscure written explanation from the HSE to the effect that it didn't apply. They weren't convinced of the technical correctness of this argument but were happy to agree, and it was clear the HSE Construction Inspectorate did not want to get involved in such projects. The current Regulations change the scope of CDM in this context, although there's still confusion.
I think this is a similar situation. If not, the pile of ***** you've just heaped up from emptying the cowshed becomes an "earthwork"!
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Phil Rose
Yes I think L's approach is pretty sound, and Dave - I like your analogy!
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Phil Clash
Lwood,
you're absolutely right...being a part time farmer, part time safety soul...the HSE are generally more interested in making sure farmers dont kill themselves, but without the big stick and bureaucracy that other industries bemoan.
However, I have to qualify that by saying some authorities, and local councils, seem to treat issues differently...and afore anyone states that local authorities don't have a say in health & safety enforcement...think about domestic/business refuse, licensing, planning (roads/ditches/bunds/barns) and they don't want to just see the proposals but how you're going to do it, I could go on but I'm boring myself!!!
anyway Lwods hit the spot
Phil
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Ron Hunter
Also, given the numerous accidents in Agriculture involving plant & vehicles, that the standard of the machines and the competency of those operating them should be a primary consideration, these issues being overarching & not limited to any CDM context.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Pete48
I don't have a definitive answer to the question but the question did prompt me to have a look around because my initial reaction was surely not.
Even after reading the Regulations I still could not see how they were ever intended to cover this sort of maintenance work. I could see ways to include them but none as to why you would want to.
So I went off on an interweb virtual tour. HSE.NFU.AGB.DEFRA et al. Multiple mentions of CDM Regs there were for agriculture and farming but none referred to drainage maintenance. Erection of steel buildings, new structures, major mods to existing all get mentioned but never drainage maintenance. That seems to suggest to me that CDM has never been on the radar of these groups for works such as these. Omissions or error perhaps but enough to follow the RA/SSOW route to assure safe working and worry about CDM if someone wished to challenge you??
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Richard Altoft
original question mentions new drains as well as maintenance of existing ones - that tips the balance for me away from "ordinary agricultural work" and strengthens my opinion CDM applies.
R
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.