Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 05 June 2009 13:10:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Stewpot Hey there guys, It has been brought to my attention by our HR department that one of our technicians is blind in one eye. Just wondering what the additional risks imposed to the employee by partial sight are, and what steps I should take. Obviously ensuring eye protection is worn is essential, but PPE should be used as a last resort only. What steps could I take to mitigate any risks. Do I need to do a personal risk assessment for the employee?
Admin  
#2 Posted : 05 June 2009 13:40:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Decimomal The well known case law on this one is Paris V Stepney where a one eyed man lost the sight of his other eye due to not wearing eye protection. The outcome of the case was that employers owe an additional duty of care to employees in such circumstances. You have not said what industry you are in or what the specific hazards and asociated risks are, but you are correct in saying that PPE is the last resort. An individual risk assessment in my view is exactly the right approach in the circumstances: Identify the hazards and risks and follow the hierarchy of control. If PPE is still the only solution it would be absolutely necessary to obtain the correct protection and to ensure that it is worn at all times when subjected to the hazard(s). You may need to consider relocating the employee to another department if the risks are too great.
Admin  
#3 Posted : 05 June 2009 13:43:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Tabs As you give no clues as to the industry, the job, the environment, no-one here can tell you what the extra risks are. I would say yes to doing an individual risk assessment - but do it sensibly. Start by asking the employee's opinion.
Admin  
#4 Posted : 05 June 2009 13:46:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Bob Y Both the above offer sensible advice, but little anyone can do to help without more information on your industry and the work that the person is doing. As a starting point I suggest you take some time to sit down with the person and see how they feel about the various risks etc
Admin  
#5 Posted : 05 June 2009 15:41:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Stewpot Apologies, Our company is an engineering firm and the employee's main duties are to repair and test pressure equipment such as pumps etc.
Admin  
#6 Posted : 05 June 2009 20:21:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Peter How Ouch! You know the hazard - blindness from an eye injury due to flying metal bits or liquids. You can only control the risk by placing something in front of the eye in an eng workshop. Your employee should be wearing the polycarconate, high impact grade, of LEP at all times working in the workshop. If this needs to be a prescription set then so be it. Engineers wearing plain LEP over their ordinary spec is a no-no. When they are pressure testing equipment with liquids (what bar pressure?) consider wearing a full face shield with the under chin guard to prevent any high pressure liquid getting directly to their face. I am personally NOt a goggles man. They always mist up, scratch, fill with dust. there shoud be a desk or rest area where LEP can be removed. regards Peter
Admin  
#7 Posted : 06 June 2009 22:55:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ron Hunter I find this suggested "individual assessment" approach utterly nonsensical. Controls must be robust enough to prevent eye injury where the hazard is present - & this goes for all potentially at risk. The increased duty applies not to risk assessment but to SUPERVISION in ensuring controls are maintained - the key failure in the case law mentioned above.
Admin  
#8 Posted : 07 June 2009 08:58:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Phil Rose Ron My understanding of Paris was not that it was one of a failure in supervision, but rather a failure of the employer to understand the increased risk to someone with monocular vision. I would have thought that some form of 'individual' assessment was entirely reasonable. In saying that I would assume that the precautions are unlikely to be any different for someone with monocular vision.
Admin  
#9 Posted : 07 June 2009 17:08:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Steve M Granger A lot of good advice on protecting his sight, but no one has asked the question if he already wears glasses or eye protection so I think that’s a good starting point rather than assuming he is a walking eye trauma accident - you never know he might electrocute himself! I'd also establish if the workshop 'risk activities' are well managed to prove the reasonableness bla, bla, bla....... now what about the other risks to him (and others)? I agree that a one to one discussion is essential and you need to establish if there is a real risk or just a perception because of the DoC. How and when did he loose his sight, does it actually cause him concern, are there jobs he finds more difficult as a result etc etc? I do not know if colour perception or astigmatism is exaggerated or affected by monocular vision – something to check with him – especially if working with coloured pipe work, labels, dials and gauges. Being monocular may introduce other problems such as fatigue and strain on his eye as it will be compensating for the loss etc. This in turn may introduce headache, stress (performance issues) and of course common hazards such as tripping may be amplified. As an engineer, does he rely on sight for machine accuracy or is his work safety critical such as over pressure test work etc, or is there a lot of DSE working? If so you may need to include a balanced week of activities, not forgetting that as he ages so the impairment will be aggravated. If you need advice look on how such a disability may affect someone try a web search and you will find government advice, support groups for the partial sighted as well as those who have no sight. It may identify the need for different or enhanced monitors / calibration equipment etc. I drafted a specific risk assessment questionnaire for the disabled (including temp disability such as the weekend ‘sportsters’ coming in to work with broken legs!) and permanent disability. This was a simple interview structure by way of a half dozen questions to ask and record answers and actions. I also prepared a similar approach for maternity assessments as they are 1-1 interview style assessments. Steve
Users browsing this topic
Guest (2)
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.