Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 05 June 2009 20:14:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jonf
Hi all, do I need proof of "competency" to carry out Fire Wardens Training? - have been training various companies in the above course for a number of years (classroom environment, PowerPoint, handouts etc). No actual teaching qualifications though. Was initially asked by my company to "do the course."

Health and Safety Advisor now Manager with practical experience and NEBOSH qualifications. Thanks in advance.
Admin  
#2 Posted : 06 June 2009 02:18:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Messy Shaw
A competent person is defined in the FSO as someone with

"sufficient training and experience or knowledge and other qualities".

Sounds to me you fit that description.

Admin  
#3 Posted : 06 June 2009 14:18:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jonf
Thanks for the above reply; not a "genius" on the subject, however, never had any issues with running the course or answering any fire related questions on the subject. The course is relativly "basic" - no need for in-depth complicated detail.
Admin  
#4 Posted : 06 June 2009 17:38:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By TBC
Gets better with age - good luck.
Admin  
#5 Posted : 06 June 2009 21:41:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By FAH
The need to self-certificate ourselves to satisfy someone who expects or requires a "recognised certification of competence" even when there is no definable body or authority competent to issue such a certificate has been here for some time.

Suggested future required examples could be[delete all but the most appropriate]:-
Are you alive/dead;
Do you know nothing/something/everything about the topic of choice.

I do miss Fridays!

Frank Hallett
Admin  
#6 Posted : 08 June 2009 11:29:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By hmattg
Hi, It depends how long you have been a trainer, If its less than 5 years you are now by law required to undertake the minimum level of teaching qualification no matter what environment you are training/teaching in or what your background and experience is. I worked for an engineering training centre when this new standard came in and virtually all our staff had to attend night school to be able to carry on working. The course you can do is a city&guilds 730-3 I think or now there is something similar call PTLLS (Preparing to Teach Lifelong Learning Skills). Both courses are about 12 weeks of 1 night per week of about 3 to 4 hour sessions. When I did mine there was about 5 essay type assignments to complete in order to pass the qualification.
Admin  
#7 Posted : 08 June 2009 11:59:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By A Campbell
hm,

I'm intrigued to know what law insists in having 5 years experience?
Is this in regards to profit making business or to teach in house subjects?
Admin  
#8 Posted : 08 June 2009 12:00:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Coshh Assessor
What law is that then?
Admin  
#9 Posted : 08 June 2009 20:48:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jonf
Never came across the issue of 5 years training - have been "doing" the course for around 5 years though. Dont fancy all that "traning" prep work!! Have been through NEBOSH Level 6 etc - no more!!

Thanks. (seems OK to carry on - I think!).
Admin  
#10 Posted : 09 June 2009 09:37:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Messy Shaw
I too would be very interested to find out more about this law.

I hear almost every working day, people referring to laws which say this or that.

Upon examination, the 'law' referred to turns out to be either guidance (such as BS or DCLG Guides) or sales talk from an eager fire extinguisher salesman and the like.

As I said in the first post above, fire safety legislation (ie the law) requires anyone assisting the Resp Person to be 'competent' ie to have: "sufficient training and experience or knowledge and other qualities"

Nothing there about a formal teaching qualification.
Admin  
#11 Posted : 09 June 2009 09:51:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Flic
I think it could be this:

http://www.opsi.gov.uk/s...i2007/uksi_20072264_en_1

I'll read it when I come back from delivering induction training.

;o)

Admin  
#12 Posted : 09 June 2009 14:55:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Sally Campbell
What about Chartered Institute of Environmental Health Professional Trainers Certificate? Surely that fits the bill?
Admin  
#13 Posted : 09 June 2009 15:07:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Messy Shaw
Flic

That law relates to further education premises and defines a teacher as:

"teacher” means a person who provides education at a further education institution under a contract of employment or a contract for services, other than a person who is employed by the institution on an occasional basis to provide updating on current commercial, industrial or professional practice; and “teach” and “teaching” are to be construed accordingly.


So I read that as you need to comply with this law to teach at a college, but not if you are teaching the staff about fire safety/H&S etc.

Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.