Rank: Guest
|
Posted By prads
Why do we insist on 24V or less lighting eqpts inside confined spaces, even if the activities inside include hot works?
regards,
P
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Phil Rose
Who insists on 24v or less lighting?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By FAH
Hi Prads
I'm assuming that you're working on a site in the UK?
There are some clients who have done their own RAs for their exposure to the consequences of working in Confined Spaces & arrived at conclusions such as the one you quote. There is no explicit legal requirement under UK legislation to use any form of electrical system simply because it's being used in a Confined Space.
However, if I was working in a metal vessel, compartment or structure where the electrical system could be sufficiently damaged that the structure could become electrically live - I would require the safest [lowest] level of electrical energy that is reasonably practicable.
Additionally, many metal vessels are used in conjunction with flammable &/or explosive substances; for these i would also require the electrical system to be as low energy [& also ATEX standard] as possible.
Frank Hallett
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By prads
Thank you, Frank!!
I guessed the same answer to my own querry. So it is not the 'intrinsically' safe factor of the lighting but the 'reduced voltage' factor that defines the requirement of 24 V lighting.
Thanks to all who replied.
Regards,
Prads
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By garyh
My experience is that 110v lighting is often used, simply for the usual reason of avoiding 240v systems.
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.