Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 08 June 2009 12:00:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By N Goodwin We have a couple of UV tanning booths in our sports centre. Under the HSAWA and the Management Regs we have carried out a risk assessment and taken measures to control the risks identified, including staff training, screening between units,etc. We have also posted a warning notice inside the room for customers on the health risks associated with using UV tanning equipment (as recommended by HSE). My question is, apart from warning customers of the dangers, are we legally obliged to do more? Should we ask customers to fill in a health check questionnaire before using the equipment? Should we monitor/restrict the number of sessions per week that each customer has? or are customers responsible for their own health?
Admin  
#2 Posted : 08 June 2009 12:40:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Chris Packham Are people allowed to use the equipment unsupervised and is the centre open to the public? If so there are issues about preventing excessive use, in particular by young people. Chris
Admin  
#3 Posted : 08 June 2009 12:53:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By N Goodwin Chris, The centre is open to members, including young people and they use the UV tanning booths unsupervised.
Admin  
#4 Posted : 08 June 2009 13:11:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Chris Packham Then I suggest you have a rethink. The following was taken from the HPA website regarding modified guidance on sun beds. "Changes from previous versions include the recommendation that under-18s should not use sunbeds and that all coin-operated salons should be supervised by trained staff. Exposure to UV radiation tanning equipment before the age of 35 years significantly increases the risk of several types of skin cancer." Check out your liability and insurance situation with your insurance provider for a situation where a young person fries themselves on one of your beds! You might be surprised at what you learn! Chris
Admin  
#5 Posted : 08 June 2009 13:40:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jay Joshi Refer to HSE guidance on "Reducing health risks from the use of ultraviolet (UV) tanning equipment" to both operators and users http://www.hse.gov.uk/pubns/indg209.pdf http://www.hse.gov.uk/PRESS/2009/e09038.htm Two key changes have been made from previous versions - HSE now recommends that under-18s do not use sunbeds and that all coin-operated salons are supervised by trained staff. You can display posters:- http://www.hse.gov.uk/pubns/misc869.pdf
Admin  
#6 Posted : 08 June 2009 14:23:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Chris Packham Take a look at: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/...s/south_west/8028898.stm Note the comment from the dermatologist. One problem that was not included in the article is that once someone has become badly burned through excessive exposure to UV the damage has been done. Even though they may subsequently avoid exposure to UV there is a heightened possibility that at some future date, possibly years later, they will suffer from a malignant melanoma that could result in death. Another issue that is often not appreciated is that a tan achieved using UVA, which is what most sunbeds use, does not increase the level of pigmentation (melanin) in the skin and thus does not increase the skin's ability to withstand the UVB from the sun. Furthermore, it is the UVB that is mainly responsible for the synthesis of Vitamin D. All the UVA does is produce a cosmetic tan and cause degradation of the collagen fibres leading to premature skin ageing. It also depresses the immune system, so could put an individual at increased risk of infection. (It is actually used as PUVA therapy for the treatment of immune instigated skin problem, e.g. psoriasis, by depressing the immune system and so reducing the severity of the problem. The potential liability issue is complex, but could be significant. Chris
Admin  
#7 Posted : 08 June 2009 17:43:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Phil Rose Neil, looks like you have some good advice there. Certainly something to think about. Me? I just turn red!
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.