Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Tony McIntosh
i've recently been informed that operators of scissor lifts and other MEWPS now require actual licenses. After several trawls through the interweb including accessing the hse website I can't find clear guidelines on what is required.
Anyone experienced in these requirements?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Dave Wilson
Kepoppycock!!
Users of MEWPS have to be 'Trained' by a 'competent' person so that they are 'competent'to operate the equipment
See http://www.hse.gov.uk/pubns/cis58.pdf the industry recognised way is by using an IPAF or PAL trainer, however there is no legal requirement to do so.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By holmezy
Tony,
operators need to be trained and competent as already stated. Where the confusion may be entering proceedings is the same as in the case of FLT's.
I often get told that employees need a license for the FLT. There is no such thing as a FLT license! What they actually need is a FLT certificate, or similar proof that they have achieved a basic standard. Even that doesnt make them "good" drivers in some cases.
So are your people getting confused about certs and licenses?
Holmezy
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Tony McIntosh
No, i'm aware of all this.
Our appointed electricians recently had to hire a scissor lift and I was chatting to the driver who mentioned that drivers now need a license that is recognised throughout europe
.....or maybe has talking a load of poppycock.
He did mention this was a 2009 requirement
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Alan Hoskins
Tony,
Take a look at http://www.ipaf.org/
This is probably what they are referring to.
Alan
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Tony McIntosh
thanks Alan.
Sounds like another FLT licence / certificate debate as someone said earlier.
Although it does use the word 'license' on the IPAF card that is issued!!
strange one
anyway, it's too hot for semantics
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Swis
you heard right. depending onhow would you define the word 'license'?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Dave Merchant
I've argued many times that people should stop saying "licence" on a training document unless it's for driving a car, but they still do.
"Licences" are granted to permit someone to perform an act that is controlled by an enforcement body, be that criminal law, contract, etc. - without one, you cannot do it. There may or may not be any need to prove competence, training, etc. - a fishing licence is legally required but carrying one doesn't mean you're any good at catching the things!
"Certificates" prove someone attended a course and passed (the term "certificate of attendance" is another pet peeve of mine!), and they *MAY* be assumed to be competent because of that fact, but the paperwork does not in any way _guarantee_ competence, nor is the certificate required by the enforcement body - you can gain "competence to drive" from loads of places, but only the DSA issues the "licence".
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By CFT
Dave W
A nicely passioned initial response if I may say:-)
CFT
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.