Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 02 July 2009 08:26:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By loweysafety All, Need advice. I have been instructed to produce a Fire RA for isolated buidlings with respect to the new RRFSO guidance. This are now relatively abandoned buildings used by no more than 1 or 2 persons visited for no more than two days a week (for routine work and inspection). So they still have services (power source, IT network etc). They are also secure from vandals/arson. To what length should the RA go? To avoid going to great lengths would an inspection do? If not, does anyone know where I can get hold a simplified FSO version without exhaustive detail. Regards, Lowey
Admin  
#2 Posted : 02 July 2009 08:41:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Admin  
#3 Posted : 02 July 2009 08:51:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By garyh Fire risk assessment in reality is simple in principle. It only gets complicated really for complicated premises or situations. In the RA I would run though each aspect in turn, detailing the situation, how it is controlled and what if any changes are needed ie Sources of Fuel Ignition sources (remembering arson) Mean of detecting fire Means of raising the alarm How many people at risk, locations, any with mobility issues, children etc Means of escape Prevention of fire spread Signage Emergency planning, roles, drills Emergency lighting if required, maintenance of it and also alarm systems Document this. You ned to have a good look around the premises and then write your RA, not the other way around, of course! Hope this helps.
Admin  
#4 Posted : 02 July 2009 09:13:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By martinw Lowey keep an eye on the building completion dates for the blocks that you are looking at. If any were constructed after the 2006 Approved Document B came into effect, they require different minimum fire alarm etc standards than those completed say in 2003. Let me know if I can help (if you require it of course). If you want we can chat off forum simply to share info rather than have to bicker with others ;-) so if you wish I could give you a call to discuss. Martin
Admin  
#5 Posted : 02 July 2009 10:49:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By tdunbar Bearing in mind that a fire alarm system is only required where, to the extent that it is appropriate, necessary.
Admin  
#6 Posted : 02 July 2009 11:12:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By A Campbell lowey, May also consider risk/likelihood and preventative measures of potential arson. As non occupied buildings be be of higher likelihood... school holidays approaching?
Admin  
#7 Posted : 02 July 2009 11:45:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By martinw tdunbar true - but Approved Doc B is frustratingly open when it talks about 'small buildings or premises the means of raising the alarm may be simple.' Shouts, gongs, etc. It then goes on get all specific: 'in all other cases the building should be provided with a suitable electrically operated fire warning system with anual call points sited adjacent to exit doors ans sufficient sounders to be clearly audible throughout the building.' So I presume the latter until I can justify the former. Not disagreeing - just adding some other guidance for interpretative assistance for others.
Admin  
#8 Posted : 02 July 2009 11:52:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By loweysafety All, Cheers for the advice. Just to expand a bit they are mostly Porta-cabin type buildings now abandoned. They are ex big operational sites which are now left disused but still require looking after to some degree. Due to age the fire alarm systems are mostly redundant and we are relying on smoke alarms - old records pretty much still exist (fire records, extinguishers, asbestos surveys etc) they just need updating (to new RRFSO). Changes include the much lower occupancy type and usage. Martin - I may take you up on the offer of chat if thats ok - will be back later.
Admin  
#9 Posted : 02 July 2009 12:11:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By tdunbar Sure Martinz, but you are referring to a guidance document for new and renovated buildings. I am referring to legislation concerning fire risk assessments. If you are carrying out a FRA for a building which is in compliance with Building Regs then it would most likely have an electric fire alarm system because most BC officer can't tell the difference between that and a means of giving early warning in the event of a fire. If the subject building doesn't have a system you would have to determine if, because of the risk, it is appropriate and necessary to provide a means of giving warning and, if so, depending on the risk, what type.
Admin  
#10 Posted : 02 July 2009 12:41:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By martinw Again I am not disagreeing, however it again can depend on the date within which the premises were built. I regularly carry out FRAs on sites and refer back to both Approved doc B and to the RRO in tandem, as due to the most recent regs(Came into force 2007) in a lot of instances fire alarm panels and call points are required, when in the 2000 version they were not in exactly the same type, size and nature of premises. So my fire risk assessment is sometimes process driven in that I have to look to see what is required at times as well as making my own assessment.
Users browsing this topic
Guest (2)
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.