Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 14 July 2009 11:26:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Buzz Just wondered how other organisations are managing this when the individual can self-certify up to a week?
Admin  
#2 Posted : 14 July 2009 11:27:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By martinw Was mentioned on the news last night that the government are considering psople being able to self certificate for two weeks in the current situation. That would be interesting.
Admin  
#3 Posted : 14 July 2009 12:17:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By LMR Somethings needs to be addressed where companies have Bradford point schemes or bonus payments dependant upon full attendance at work and having these suspended for the duration. My daughter got swine flu and with underlying health conditions has been very ill; she has lost her annual bonus. The virus was taken into her work place by someone who did not want to lose their bonus so carried on working whilst obviously suffering the symptoms. As a result I have had to be treated with tamiflu and move out of my house leaving her in quarantine. My other daughter, son in law and two grandchildren (on only 5 months old) have also had to be treated with tamiflu. In total 15 of us in my family have been affected by one person who did not want to lose a cash bonus! The company have since had their entire workforce ill to one degree or another and some have worked through to the weekend and returned on the Monday. But he has saved paying the bonus to a lot of the staff! Self certified or not for 7 or 14 days will make little difference if the penalties of being absent affect the workers pocket or can be accumulated for possible disciplinary actions. A chicken or egg situation?
Admin  
#4 Posted : 14 July 2009 15:12:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Peter F. I do have sympathy for you and yours, but when people have a bonus scheme it always encourages those who are ill to attend. The offset of this is that if then you go off with the same symptoms then you look like your a skiver. I have always argued against people attending work if they are not well, with anything that can be passed to another person.
Admin  
#5 Posted : 14 July 2009 15:22:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Chris Packham Just one comment on this. As I understand it people are infectious well before they have any symptoms. So it is perfectly possible that someone can transmit the infection in a workplace whilst completely unaware that they have the flu. Chris
Admin  
#6 Posted : 14 July 2009 15:31:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By holmezy Shouldn't we (or the HR dept) be dealing with absence due to swine flu the same way as we would deal with any other absence? After all, we keep being told that its "just another flu virus" so why build it up? As with anything that you can't see and MAY be exaggerated to a Doctor, ie flu, back ache etc (as opposed to broken leg etc), its very difficult to say that people wern't ill. Having said that, I do feel some sympathy for employees were attendance is linked to bonus! Holmezy
Admin  
#7 Posted : 14 July 2009 16:08:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By PhilP Sorry to go off thread but to answer Chris, all of the current guidance states that a person is not contagious until symtomatic. The follow thread links to several points of reverence. http://www.businesslink....=www.businesslink.gov.uk Happy reading Philip
Admin  
#8 Posted : 14 July 2009 16:28:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Dave Merchant "...several points of reverence" Freud passes you his best wishes.
Admin  
#9 Posted : 14 July 2009 17:20:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Chris Packham PhilP All? How long can an infected person spread this virus to others? At the current time, CDC believes that this virus has the same properties in terms of spread as seasonal flu viruses. With seasonal flu, studies have shown that people may be contagious from one day before they develop symptoms to up to 7 days after they get sick. Children, especially younger children, might potentially be contagious for longer periods. CDC is studying the virus and its capabilities to try to learn more and will provide more information as it becomes available. From Center for Disease Control website on H1N1 virus. Chris
Admin  
#10 Posted : 15 July 2009 09:06:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By PhilP Chris The advice we've been given by the HPA through our local PCT, is until the person is symptomatic they should be in work/school. Anyone showing symptoms should stay at home or be sent home. You’re right the contagious period varies by person, but the rule of thumb the PCT have told us to use is from becoming symptomatic until symptoms cease (about 7-10 days). From a business continuity point of view, if we said anyone who has come into contact with a virus carrier (day 1) must not come into work, then we go back to Buzz’s original question. It certainly would be open to abuse if staff were to say “I was exposed to the virus, so I’ll see you 3-5 days in case I get the symptoms”. Yes some staff will always take the opportunity for a skive, but what happens when they do actually get the virus? There are no cases of second infections, so how would they explain that. I don’t think there’s going to be a right or wrong answer to this particular issue, all companies are going have to find what fits with their staff and working arrangements. Phil
Admin  
#11 Posted : 15 July 2009 09:41:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By John Richards Since surgeries are on high-alert because of swine flu, and patients exhibiting flu-like symptoms are NOT allowed into the surgeries, it may take a while to get a "sick-note".
Admin  
#12 Posted : 15 July 2009 09:45:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By John Richards You could always try the suggestions here: http://www.theregister.c...k/2009/04/27/swine_flu1/
Admin  
#13 Posted : 15 July 2009 10:15:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Seamus O Sullivan Hi I am wondering If a staff member does have flu like illness and insists in going to work. what can be used to insist the person goes home. I notice that in Ireland people with H1N1 are quarantined at home, if the person says sod this I am off to a Foosball match in the city, can they be forced to stay at home. I know this is an unusual question, and common sense would suggest stay at home. The mental health act would not apply here, so what other grounds can you think of to keep the person at home. More worrying I recently heard on the radio that tamiflu does not help some with H1N1. Regards Seamus
Admin  
#14 Posted : 15 July 2009 10:47:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By D H Difficult question Seamus - if you force them to go home are you then obliged to pay them? Are others then going to follow suit? How do you make the definition between swine flu and summer colds? Indications are that 1 in 3 people could be affected and that could have a terrible impact on industry if they are all sent home. Just let it run its course? I don't know - but would be interested in others comments? Dave
Admin  
#15 Posted : 15 July 2009 10:55:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By John Richards If they have swine flu then their use to industry, other than as a disease vector, is extremely limited.
Admin  
#16 Posted : 15 July 2009 11:29:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By D H If it can be as mild as reported in many cases, they may still be able to work. I would not be surprised if there are a lot of people who have had it and did not realise? Dave
Admin  
#17 Posted : 15 July 2009 12:12:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Buzz Good link John!!! The one about people wanting to come into work is interesting as whilst most people want to stay off work when they are sick, there are quite a few people that will drag themselves in regardless. The one about absentee management is this... If the person self certifies for a week, which they can do, this should more than cover the incubation period of the condition; and for most people they will feel fit to come back to work after a week, some before. However, flu effects people differently and what if the person is still feeling ill on day 8? They can no longer self certify but will they be seen by a doctor to get a sick certificate? If not, how will the employer manage this? For most managers you know who's pulling a fast one and who isn't; but what can you do? Also, should I point out that you can catch this more than one?......another topic maybe :)
Admin  
#18 Posted : 15 July 2009 12:18:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jay Joshi News headline:- "Workers could be allowed to sign themselves off for twice as long as normal if they are suspected to have swine flu under plans being considered by ministers" Refer to:- http://www.telegraph.co....s-off-for-two-weeks.html http://www.personneltoda...f-with-no-sick-note.html Also, there is no longer the "containment phase"--it has moved on to treatment phase, therefore not all potential cases are being tested positively, except the hospital admissions.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.