Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 14 July 2009 20:34:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Crim
Carrying on from the other thread re fire risk assessment and competence I have been looking into this Register.

You do not have to be a member of the IFE but you do have to pay a non refundable application fee of £160. then, if successful an annual fee of £276.

I was wondering if anyone has entered into this and, if so what is the experience of its worth/value to a health and safety adviser who also does fire risk assessments?

You can look at the Register and find not too many names - I wonder why?
Admin  
#2 Posted : 14 July 2009 20:43:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By martinw
Partially because they knock back 40% of applicants simply due to the presentation of their risk assessments or the criteria they use. Tough crowd. Plus, I suspect that specific experience helps(fire service) but that is just my prejudice. Who knows?
Admin  
#3 Posted : 14 July 2009 20:49:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By shaun mckeever
Colin Todd who is one of the board and a well known character within the fire industry is not a fan of fire service officers so I can be reasonably certain that being a fire officer is not necessarily an advantage.
Admin  
#4 Posted : 14 July 2009 20:56:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Crim
OK chaps that's one goal each!

I'm fairly confident that I would get through as I have shed loads of experience and training as a former fire service officer, plus a good recent record of fire risk assessments that I can prove and provide the referees.

I am just unable to justify to myself the cost as I am self employed.
Admin  
#5 Posted : 14 July 2009 22:29:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Stuff4blokes
Crim, if being a member results in a couple of jobs coming your way, that's fees paid surely?

I am waiting for the qualification period to pass since passing one of their approved courses before applying. I feel it will be money well spent, but of course, this is just my opinion.

IFE accreditation as a fire risk assessor must carry some weight if competence is being discussed.
Admin  
#6 Posted : 14 July 2009 22:39:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By D. Hilton
Not required in ROI otherwise I would register
Admin  
#7 Posted : 14 July 2009 22:48:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Crim
Do we know if potential clients actually look at this or any other Register prior to requesting a safety consultant to carry out a fire risk assessment?

What weight does it carry?

Of course if it was "required" we would all be applying.
Admin  
#8 Posted : 14 July 2009 23:46:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By shaun mckeever
Don't forget the other acreditation schemes at BRE and Warrington fire.
Admin  
#9 Posted : 15 July 2009 07:26:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Stuff4blokes
Crim, as well as the accreditation I am looking at it as a marketing tool i.e. to add credence to my sales efforts.

So if I can tell potential clients that besides my CV, my website, my presentation, my offer etc that I am also "kosher" as defined by IFE to carry out fire risk assessments, they will be more likely to say yes.

All this is speculation so far and of course I may be rejected by IFE!
Admin  
#10 Posted : 15 July 2009 08:41:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By GeoffB4
Wouldn't it be best to talk to some members and see what their experience is?
Admin  
#11 Posted : 15 July 2009 09:50:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Stuff4blokes
Anyone here who is on the IFE list? Care to chat either online or privately?
Admin  
#12 Posted : 17 July 2009 08:35:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By DPK
Why not join as a member, if you have the relevant fire safety qualifications you will obtain the designatory letters behind your name which also shows a level of competence as you have had to obtain them through assessment in the first place.

I can not recall the exact price for this membership but i think it is cheaper than the register.

Just a thought.

Another point, in the past five years of conducting FRA's for businesses, only twice have i been asked for evidence of competence. The majority of business people do not know the IFE even exists.

DPK
Admin  
#13 Posted : 17 July 2009 09:49:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By D. Hilton
DPK
Membership of IFE is typically by examination at a number of levels with Membership MIFireE being at the level of CMIOSH

Darren

Admin  
#14 Posted : 17 July 2009 10:02:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By tony fog
I'm an accredited fire risk assessor on the IFSM (institute of fire safety managers), although i would easily qualify for the IFE register due to qualifications and experience i find the Register I'm on is excellent and great value for money, google and have a look

ta

tony
Admin  
#15 Posted : 17 July 2009 10:07:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Crim
I have looked at membership and currently awaiting some communication from the local branch, cost is less than the register of assessors and does allow for a discount once a member.

The process is a bit long winded but there is a chance I could join as either Grad or MIFE?

I was a Grad I F E some years ago but let that lapse.

I agree that not many people out there know the IFE exists, and it is onle this week I have been asked for proof of competence for the first time.

My CV and added resume of fire related work appears to be enough.

Admin  
#16 Posted : 17 July 2009 10:09:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Crim
Hi Tony,

I did have a look but as other posters say how many people know they exist?

Do you get any value from being a member as you are?

Do you know if prospective clients have a look at the register you are on?

Thanks.
Admin  
#17 Posted : 17 July 2009 10:38:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By tony fog
Hi,

I get regular enquiries but like most of the work we all do as you probably knows is with clients we have worked with for along time and word of mouth is often the best way. I joined the IFSM as its reasonable cost per year at around £85, you get there logo to go on your reports stating your an accredited assessor, the entry is quite rigorous and I suppose it should be, its very similar to the IFE procedure, but I find the IFSM is more approachable and very good at supporting you if you have queries and need some advise,I suppose if you looking to get work from these sites I wouldn't be banking on the phone ringing all day that's for sure but for reassurance to clients its well worth it
Admin  
#18 Posted : 18 July 2009 15:39:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Richard Hammer
When attending a fire seminar recently, hosted by IFSM, they are hoping in time a national register is established by a independent party.

You have currently three memberships IFSM, IFPO (Institute Fire Prevention Officers) and IFE. The first two being break away groups and only been around recently compared to IOSH and IFE.

IFSM,IFPO,IFE, BRE and Warrington fire (since changed their name)have registers. I would advise become a member, this process is in line with IOSH (prove of 5 years experience in fire safety, academic qualifications, level of work environments etc,etc will depend on what level you join at). I am a member of IFSM and IFPO which provides some sort of evidence of my level of competence. I will be applying for the register for IFSM again to further my prove of competence.

I have currently not got involved with IFE, due to mainly my working environment being low to medium level risk work. If I started to do a lot of high risk, then IFE would be my next step.

No doubt in 5 or so years time, clients will become more and more aware of such organisations along the lines of how IOSH is established in H&S. More and more medium/high risk environments are requesting such prove and just being Grad/CMIOSH is not acceptable.

I am enrolling into the CFPA Europe Diploma in Fire Prevention next year to provide and add to my academic side.

And no doubt in time a national register will be up and running, accredited by a third party, independent (same lines as UKAS).

Best to move now rather than later.
Admin  
#19 Posted : 18 July 2009 15:42:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Richard Hammer
Also just to mention, at this seminar, one of the speakers insisted that if you are not familiar with and follow BS9999 you should no longer be classed as competent.....

Agree or not??
Admin  
#20 Posted : 18 July 2009 19:06:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By shaun mckeever
Not! It is a bit too black and white. If you are promoting yourself as an expert in fire safety fair enough, in which case you might also argue that you should be familiar with NFPA 101 too. However if your business is a chain of small corner shops and you are conducting FRA's on each of them then why the hell should you need to be familiar with BS9999?
Admin  
#21 Posted : 18 July 2009 19:25:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Crim
BS9999 is not a "standard" yet so although on the way it is not relevant.

Small question, possibly with a large answer -
"Why is there more than one recognised fire standard institution for registers of competent fire risk assessors?"

They all appear to be similar in size and weight. Unlike IOSH and BSC for example.

If you choose them all it is costly, if you do not choose the right one you may miss a client.

Admin  
#22 Posted : 18 July 2009 19:47:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By shaun mckeever
BS9999 is a British Standard as of October last year
Admin  
#23 Posted : 18 July 2009 19:52:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By martinw
But only relevant to new buildings, significant alterations to existing structures etc. Makes no difference to most of our work unless you are involved in very new builds.
Admin  
#24 Posted : 18 July 2009 21:43:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Crim
Pardon my ignorance?

I don't get involved with building design - only with fire risk assessment of existing premises and premises following refurbishment.

There is probably a need for me to familiarise myself with BS9999 but having just googled the BSI and see the cost is £290.00 I will not be purchasing a copy for myself.

Now I suppose I should ask myself "am I competent"?

Admin  
#25 Posted : 18 July 2009 23:16:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Richard Hammer
Ah but it is the new standard.

If you only look after small corner type shops then the Government guidance doc should suffice the RP to attempt their own FRA. i would be very suspicious of compeetent persons charging such SME companies £500/600 for the FRA.

BS9999 is not like ADB and can be implemented at any time. Good use is the risk profiling section which will determine the management requirements of the building.

There are 3 levels in most eyes

Government guidance
ADB/BS9999
Principle fir engineering solutions/BS7974

And don't even bother getting me started on Regulation16B and the current non compliance currently in place.

Sooner we get a CDM Regs type approach in fire safety the better.........tea anyone???
Admin  
#26 Posted : 19 July 2009 10:13:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By shaun mckeever
Martin, familiarity with the principles adopted in BS9999 would be useful for anyone undertaking a FRA, so although applicable to new builds, refurbishments etc there is no reason why you, I, or anyone else on this forum can't use it to make a difference to our FRA's.
Admin  
#27 Posted : 19 July 2009 11:48:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By martinw
I agree Shaun but only if it is relevant in the circumstances. In mine, it is not yet relevant. Even the write-up from the BSI gives a cautious instruction:

'It can be used as a tool for assessing existing buildings, although fundamental change in line with the guidelines might well be limited or not practicable.'

That does not mean that I will be a Luddite about 9999 but I will keep it in the back of my mind until it becomes necessary.
Admin  
#28 Posted : 19 July 2009 19:26:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Crim
I recently had two very long conversations with a Fire Safety officer from the local fire brigade, the first included some guidance on a fire risk assessment I had recently carried out, the second followed me sending a sample fire risk assessment to gain his opinion on the quality or otherwise of my assessments.

At no time during our discussions did he mention BS9999!

He did mention the FSRRO a few times, and also some recently received guidance all fire brigades have received re the fire risk assessments they will audit in future.

I an awaiting a copy of that further guidance as he was good enough to offer me a copy.

His opinion of my assessments is that they "tick all the boxes" and if he came accross that standard in future it will be good enough for him.

His work currently involves auditing fire risk assessments and that is good enough for me thank you.
Admin  
#29 Posted : 19 July 2009 19:45:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Richard Hammer
One major problem with the enforcing authorities is the different approach is area/ individual has. What may work in Essex may not work in London or even within each team department.

The recent seminar I mentioned earlier attendees was about 70% fire officers, which they highlighted this big problem (hence types like the name mentioned earlier are not overly impressed with the current crop due to their competence).

Obviously we have PAS79 as a bench mark on lay out and content for FRA's.

BS9999 is new to all parties, be it consultants or the enforcers. Give it time, it will be the 'Bible' to use for competent risk assessors (the risk profiling tool will benefit any risk environment).

As I said if you only do low risk environments then the Governments guidance docs and various BS should be suffice. However if you regard yourself as competent surely you should be bringing something more for the client then just the Government guidance docs. To be competent in my eyes should mean you have a higher expertise in the field you provide a service. As the previous thread, the Law is focused on the RP and not if the risk assessor is competent or not. The Government guidance docs are there for the RP to ensure fire safety precautions are in line place and that the risk assessment is suitable and sufficient.
Admin  
#30 Posted : 19 July 2009 20:30:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By martinw
Richard
this comes back to a number of occasions on various threads where it has been pointed out that the RRO does not demand competence for the fire risk assessor. LACORS guidance says that for simple premises little expertise is likely to be required.
I agree with the idea that you should be able to give more than the minimum. But if minimums of levels of ability are not formally or legally required, there will always be those who will not push improvement of their own competence.
I have to admit that I have not been into 9999 in detail. Does it specify requirement for competence?
Admin  
#31 Posted : 19 July 2009 23:11:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Richard Hammer
That is why on some occasions the RP could quite easily produce a FRA themselves (Landlords of residential 3 storey, 1 s/c are a prime example). If they follow the guidance and use the FRA template, there really would be nothing the enforcing fire authority could do apart from guide them further. That is why I would be suspicious of seeing consultants charge £500/600 for their 'competent' advice.

BS999 is the technical guidance, along with BS7974. BS9999 state there are 3 levels on fire safety guidance. This permits the approach to correspond to the complexity of the building and the degree of flexibility required.

General approach - Government Guidance docs to support legislative requirements

Advanced approach - BS9999 - Flexible approach to fire safety with fire safety engineering principles

Fire Safety Engineering - BS7974 - Large complex buildings
Admin  
#32 Posted : 20 July 2009 09:36:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Crim
I would love to charge the £500 to £600 mantioned but my concience will not allow.

I do them on an hourly rate basis, the smaller the premises the less the fee.

Usually works out about half of the fee mentioned above.
Admin  
#33 Posted : 20 July 2009 09:39:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Messy Shaw
When considering the competence of an assessor, it is worth making the distinction here between somebody on the assessors list and somebody with the IFE letters after their name:

Anyone on the assessors list would have needed to produce examples of their work (FRA) and sit through an interview. It is reasonable to assume that they will be OK.

Anyone with IFE after their name will not automatically be fire safety competent. I know of many firefighters who passed IFE examinations twenty years ago and have had absolutely o involvement with fire safety since. Many will have no knowledge (not even a basic understanding) of the RR(FS)O 2005 so could hardly ever be deemed competent.

So it's worth being careful that an IFE badge will not automatically mean FS knowledge
Admin  
#34 Posted : 20 July 2009 11:51:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By shaun mckeever
I agree with Messy. Membership of IFE is not necessarily an indication of competence with respect to FRA's.

With regard to the fees charged, as a general rule you get what you pay for. A decent fire engineer may actually save the client money. For example to insert intumescent strips into a fire door may cost the client up to £180 a time. I am aware of this being recommended by a fire consultant when it was not necessary. As I say you, get what you pay for.
Admin  
#35 Posted : 22 July 2009 05:00:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By D. Hilton
Messy
I disagree, Membership of IFE at Grad or Membership level IPD plus CPD ensures fire safety competence.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.