Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 17 July 2009 08:36:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Tony McIntosh Morning all, I would welcome thoughts on the following: To improve pedestrian safety in a busy port, staff have suggested the demarcation of a pedestrian walkway throughout. However, in sections the pedestrian walkway would run over raised platforms requiring the use of stairs up and down. First question is: is there any danger of running into disability discrimination issues? Second question: railings must be installed at the side of the raised platform to provide edge protection. what rulings are there that stipulate what can / can't be used? It has been suggested that steel posts with high tensile chain link connecting each can be used. The height is 1.86m. Personally i'm not in favour of using chain link as rigid hand rails provide much better protection. Appreciate your thoughts thank you
Admin  
#2 Posted : 17 July 2009 08:52:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By FAH Hi Tony I can't believe I'm doing this at this time of the morning! First - what sort of pedestrians are we considering? The public or staff? The reason for that question is to differentiate between known disability & existing controls [staff] or unknown, unquantifiable disability [public]. Second - I would suggest that you use Schedule 1 to the W@H Regs as the primary reference for determining the type of protection required for the raised platforms. Frank Hallett
Admin  
#3 Posted : 17 July 2009 11:39:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Robert K Lewis There are definite disabled access issues if you do take this route whether it is public or employee. Take some advice over this. Bob
Admin  
#4 Posted : 17 July 2009 11:45:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Tony McIntosh I thought there might be. It would be for private use mainly FLT drivers and warehouse staff but the port is regularly used by contractors, port authority company clerks etc.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.