Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 20 July 2009 08:13:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Paul Leadbetter Saw this in the Guardian: http://www.guardian.co.u...sure-threat-compensation Can any one shed any more light on the issue? Paul
Admin  
#2 Posted : 20 July 2009 08:57:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By John Richards Ambulance chasing solicitors ? I think the whole asbestos thing has been done-to-death on here in the past. Opinion seemed divided between "white asbestos isn't a problem" and "moaning compensation seekers" Although everyone seemed quiet about "the biggest occupational health disaster"
Admin  
#3 Posted : 20 July 2009 23:35:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ron Hunter Paul, The article jumps around so much, and touches on 2 or 3 discrete issues. Which issue are you interested in?
Admin  
#4 Posted : 21 July 2009 08:02:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Andrew Murdy The issues covered relate to exposure to asbestos which has the potential to cause fatal lung diseases as we know. The compensation issue relates to the diagnosis of plaques which are indicative of exposure to asbestos although they don't affect lung function, hence why compensation claims are being turned down as no 'harm' in terms of function is caused. Of course, if you get one of the nasty diseases then compensation is likely if occupational exposure can be shown. But of course, a lot of lung diseases can be caused by other things (smoking is a good example) so not all cases caused by asbestos are identified and in any case there can be non-occupational exposure as well (brake maintenance at home, asbestos garage demolition, etc.). The really interesting thing is that in some places asbestos use is increasing so some countries (Russia for example) are currently building a time bomb! And when you try to manage that in accordance with Western standards life becomes very tricky. And of course people earn money from working in asbestos mines so that is hard. It's a complex situation and isn't likely to go away or get any easier in the next 30 years.
Admin  
#5 Posted : 21 July 2009 08:28:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Robert K Lewis It is not just Russia but the Far East developing countries including China and SE Asia block. The real rpoblem is that these countries now make many spare and pattern parts for major EU companies. Without some increased import vigilance I think the EU asbestos bans will fall apart. Bob
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.