Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 21 July 2009 16:29:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Mark Eastbourne Hi I work at a college. We will shortly be receiving a student (19yr) who will require an insulin "shot?" to be administered by a member of our college. Precedent has been set as this was done for him at his school. Training will be provided. I just have concerns about this. Apparently as this has been carried out previously we will get into trouble if we refuse under DDA requirements. I guess I must contact our insurers? There is no procedure written for the previous educational establishment which this student has come from who apparently takes the syringe home with him on the bus. In addition apparently our staff will need to go to the toilet with him so he can pee to check his something level. I just have some concerns, I would hate to have this responsibility but the pressure is on to take him under these conditions. Anyone with experience in this matter? Any comments welcome. Regards Mark
Admin  
#2 Posted : 21 July 2009 16:36:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Sally I take it that this lad has Additional Support Needs or some other reason why he can't administer his own insulin, with supervision if necessary. It's common for even young children to do this themselves. If it does need to be done by a third party then you need to ensure that they have sufficient training. Often the Diabetic Nurse in charge of the youngster can provide this. The other issue is insurance - standard is that staff are covered for anything that might go wrong but it is worth checking. In terms of responsibility provided the above is done it is no more than for providing any other type of personal care.
Admin  
#3 Posted : 21 July 2009 16:37:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By grahams Hello Mark, I assume the student has other difficulties so they can't administer this themselves
Admin  
#4 Posted : 21 July 2009 16:37:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Sally Sorry, just seen that you have addressed training and insurance. This not being able to see original post when you type reply is a pain!!
Admin  
#5 Posted : 21 July 2009 16:51:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Fred Pratley It is very difficult to comment without all the facts, but just because the previous school has previously done something should not be viewed as a reason for you to do so. In fact, I would suggest that as part of the "growing" process, perhaps this is the perfect time for this student to become independent of support for this important aspect of his life. Regards Fred
Admin  
#6 Posted : 21 July 2009 17:04:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ron Hunter Some pointers here for you perhaps: http://www.paisley.ac.uk...ds/legislation/dda-4.asp
Admin  
#7 Posted : 21 July 2009 17:15:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Colin Reeves I agree with Fred that efforts should be made to allow / train this student to fend for him/herself in the future, as will inevitably be the case. However, one thing puzzles me greatly. Once your diabetes has got to the point where insulin injections are needed, then blood testing is the only accurate way of testing for blood sugars. Urine testing is simply not adequate. Blood testing does not need to be done in the toilet, in fact, that is the worst place to do it!! Somewhere your information is lacking so it may be that you have not been told the full story. I would wish to ensure that I have the correct information. Colin (Insulin user myself)
Admin  
#8 Posted : 22 July 2009 11:02:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Mark Eastbourne Morning gang Thank you for the responses, I will investigate further. Yes he does have special needs and is unable to administer himself. I will also look at the link which I have not done yet. Thank you for taking the time to reply. Regards Mark
Admin  
#9 Posted : 22 July 2009 11:55:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By PhilP Mark I would recommend this guidance to you as well, not just for this particular person, but for any one of your students with a medical requirement. There is a specific section on Diabetes and a 20 page annex with formats for care plans, records of administered medication, parent consent forms and the like. The guidance is entitled “….Schools and Early Years Settings”, but I don’t see why it can’t be adapted for your college. It should also have been used by the person’s previous school as it is issued by DfES, now DCFS. http://publications.teac...roductId=DFES-1448-2005& Philip
Admin  
#10 Posted : 22 July 2009 12:01:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By PhilP Sorry Mark Ment to say your insurers should provide you with a decision tree for you to use, showing what procedures they will and won't cover. You may be suprised what they will cover for. Philip
Admin  
#11 Posted : 27 July 2009 20:53:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Mark123 Hi Mark, Your new student is obviously an insulin dependent diabetic. I think my first question is why at the age of 19 he is not administering the insulin injection himself? Are there learning difficulties involved with your student? The insulin is being injected to regulate his blood sugar because his body does not produce insulin naturally. It's an easy thing to do, but obviously training should be provided from a medical practitioner for someone not used to doing this. People obviously have concerns when it comes to needles/injecting, especially if your college is asking someone to do this. How is this going to work anyway? If you have one person doing it, what happens if they are off sick etc. While DDA might well apply, I think your assessment of his condition is important. Insulin dependent diabetics can suffer hypoglycaemia (low blood sugar), which can result in disorientation, fitting and collapse. It is an important balance between insulin injection and food intake, to keep the blood sugar regulated properly. It is important that you understand the diabetic control of your student, and I think first off you need much more detail from the parents/guardians, on how this has worked before in school. Can you speak to someone at the school about it?
Admin  
#12 Posted : 27 July 2009 20:57:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Mark123 Sorry, missed half those responses first time I looked at this. Think my laptop's on the way out. Sorry for the repetition!
Admin  
#13 Posted : 30 July 2009 11:38:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By DannyC54 He is obviously an insulin dependant diabetic. My wife is also an insulin dependant diabetic and has been for 21 years. She has always without fail self administered her insulin dose(s) which in turn help to control her blood sugar levels. Does this young man have another disability which prevents him from self administering? If not I can't see why he would want anyone else to do it for him. With regard to monitoring his blood sugar levels urine testing is a very haphazard way of trying to reach and maintain control and not a long term method that would be recommended by Diabetes UK. A surer way is to take a blood test via a small finger pricker. Very simple to carry out and much more precise with regard to reading and reacting to the results. I do not blame you in feeling the way you do. Diabetes is an awful condition and without the correct training it places a lot of responsibility on you to ensure that his blood sugar is controlled to their optimum levels. Too low and he may well go hypoglycemic and go into a coma, too high and he may develop hyperglycemic symptoms of which the long term implications are kidney damage, neurological damage, cardiovascular damage, loss of vision etc.
Admin  
#14 Posted : 30 July 2009 12:02:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Glyn Atkinson If this student has physical or mental disabilities that prevent him from self administering, is that a good reason to prevent him / her from being educated to the best standard possible with DDA risk assessments being completed to help the student to remain in the college with adjustments made? Is there a First Aid or Occupational Health person available who could be trained and have time allocated to ensure that the student is always in the safe condition to continue studying at their own level of education? I am Chair to a College based Club for adults with learning disabilities and physical disabilities that takes many of its' members from the college fraternity, and the college has a dedicated study support department that does this type of student assistance to conform to DDA requirements. I don't feel that a straight refusal is a correct decision without investigation of any available government funding to supply this type of student assistance. An individual student risk assessment would provide ways of getting around this situation to suit all parties. Here's an absolutely extreme analogy - would anyone refuse Stephen Hawkins the chance to re-charge up his wheelchair to save on your electricity bill, or would you stand the bill in order to take advantage of his brilliant brain? Sorry if this sounds a but heavy, I find myself defending the rights of disabled people quite often - no offence meant !
Admin  
#15 Posted : 30 July 2009 16:49:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Mark Eastbourne No offence taken. The facts are that the student has additional learning requirements and as such cannot administer his own medication. During my research I have come across the following document which you are possibly aware of, "Disability Discrimination Act 1995 Part 4 Code of Practice for providers of Post 16 education and related services New duties (from September 2002) in the provision of post-16 education and related services for disabled people and students." Page 39 - 40 states: "Responsible bodies should not wait until a disabled person applies to a course or tries to use a Service before thinking about what reasonable adjustments they could make. Instead they should continually be anticipating the requirements of disabled people or students and the adjustments they could be making for them, such as regular staff development and reviews of practice. Failure to anticipate the need for an adjustment may mean it is too late to comply with the duty to make the adjustment when it is required. Lack of notice would not of itself provide a defence to a claim that an adjustment should have been made." Which of course I thoroughly agree with, but this document uses some examples, one of which is the following: 5.6G: "A college has had a large number of students over the years needing assistance with taking medication. The college has no current member of staff willing to administer medication. The college recruits a support worker, part of whose duties is to do this. It therefore anticipates reasonable adjustments that it might need to make for some students." As far as I know, we have not had a large amount of students who have needed assistance in administering medication, this is the first time isn't it? Using their example then, how can the current situation be called a reasonable adjustment? Personally I bend over backwards to help those less abled - I had a mother in tears the other day as her daughter who suffered from fainting spells wanted to do a course and where she worked previously - they washed their hands of her (and this is a well known supermarket!) but the reason the mother was in tears to me was because I said we would make reasonable adjustments to ensure she did the course she wanted! I said we would manage it! So I am not adverse to helping where we can but am convinced that applying medication intravenously should be done by a competent person and I am not convinced the training will be adequate. It may be, but I have put my recommendations to those responsible as well as as recommendations for looking after sharps, spares etc. So ultimately, if the training is adequate and staff are willing then we could make this adjustment. As it stands, I have just been informed that the department is willing to pay for a support nurse which does make me happier. I would also like to thank Martin from this forum who has helped me greatly and for those who responded, it is always appreciated! Regards Mark
Admin  
#16 Posted : 30 July 2009 17:02:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Colin Reeves Mark A minor point from your last positive response. You said "applying medication intravenously". In fact insulin should NEVER be given intravenously - it should always be put into a fatty area and if a vein is accidentally found, find another spot! Colin Insulin user
Admin  
#17 Posted : 30 July 2009 18:07:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By martinw Mark you are very welcome. In the event that you think that I may be able to help in future matters, do not hesitate to shout! Must be a real weight off your shoulders to know that there is a nurse available to assist. I still have a number of very relevant contacts from my former job who will be able to give the best advice available in terms of policy and procedure, so again, ask if you need to. In the meantime, hope all goes well. Martin
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.