Rank: Guest
|
Posted By cara
I have just heard that a member of staff has complained of prolonged ringing in their ears following the weekly testing of the fire alarms.
The sounder is directly above the member of staff’s desk and the level of the sounder is approx. 86dB. As I’ve said the testing is carried out once a week but not at the same time every week.
The member of staff’s manager has nicely asked if it’s possible to re-site the sounder away from the desk, but the landlord has come back saying that its utter nonsense and he will not pay for the sounder to be moved.
Yes, ok the member of staffs hearing is highly unlikely to be affected in the long term by this but I can imagine it being an annoyance.
Just wondered what you guys thought?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Dominic Smyth
Rather than moving the sounder could you move the desk?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By cara
unfortunatley not no, there are 8 desks in the office and it's not possible to re-arrnage
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Alan Hoskins
Can't she just go for a coffee???
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Ian D.
Hi Cara
Could you ask the Landlord or his agent to give you five minutes notice before the test so the person in question cold move away fro the short duration of the test. It seams a little excessive to ask the Landlord to move the sounder for such a short exposure time, failing that a more simple solution would be to issue ear plugs whilst the sounder is being tested
Regards
Ian
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By cara
Alan, that's what the landlord suggested and that would be fine if they sounded the alarms at the same time every week but they don't, it's a large building and each area is tested separately - so it would be impossible to issue warnings for each area.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Coshh Assessor
I agree with Alan, coffee time!
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Alan Hoskins
I should have been a landlord then, Cara...
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Coshh Assessor
If the interval in which it might be tested is longer than a coffee break, can she go and do some shredding or something?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Luke.
If there is 8 desks in the area... surely the 86dba registering at her ear level, would still be around 80dba-85dba at the other desks?
Do they complain? I agree with other comments, inform her of the test and let her get a coffee... that's reasonably practicable!
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Crim
I suggest that if you don't do something there will be a compensation claim on the way fairly soon!
Surely there can be advanced warning of the test?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By TonyB
Cara,
Surely the landlord must give some warning that they are going to test the alarms, so you can warn your staff that it going to be tested. If he/she doesn't and it goes off unannounced then for every test you must have to evacuate the building or do you just have people sitting around ignoring the alarm whenever it does off!
(If leaving the desk at unplanned times is the problem - what about ear plugs - put in just before the test?)
TonyB
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By D H
May I suggest that if you have 8 desks and no room to move them then it is a small office.
Accordingly 86db in a small area is excessive and needs to be toned down a bit.
Ok in an engineering shop but office? No.
Get the landlord to turn that sounder down - legally - not by stuffing paper into it!
Dave
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Bob Youel
pop a set of ear defenders on the desk - she can pop them on
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Alan Hoskins
Actually Cara, if this lady is the only one having this problem, she may have an underlying medical condition, so I would suggest to her that she has her hearing checked by a doctor/consultant.
Alan
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Lee Mac
There were some sensible suggestions above re: actually reducing the noise setting of the alarm in this particular office which is one that I would second, coffee break, ear plugs.
As a previous poster mentions it would do no harm to review your occ, health programme- I would definitley get this person checked out sooner rather than later.
Then have your occupational health prof furnish you with their recommendations for this drill.
If you do nothing as Crim mentions you will definitely have a compensation to deal with.
Regards
Lee
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Kevin Brown
If you have no prior notification of the test, and it doesn't take place according to a set schedule, how do you know its a test? It could just as easily be the real thing, in which case everyone should be heading for the escape routes.
Just because someone's paranoid doesn't mean someone else hasn't got it in for them. Likewise, its possible for a genuine alarm to occur around the time you're expecting a test. In your shoes I'd want either a set time or prior notification to warn my employees.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Crim
The point about not knowing if it is a test or otherwise is a very good one. If employees get used to remaining in their seats every time the alarm sounds they just might do the same for a real fire alarm.
Either evacuate each time the alarm sounds unannounced, or get advanced notice of a test.
I think the first might bring on the second?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Stefan Daunt
I give an announcement over the phone loudspeakers in the Company to the effect that the fire alarm will be tested shortly. Similiar situation, the sounder is in an office. If you can't announce it, I would think talking to the individual and "I'm testing the fire alarm, do you want to move away from the sounder for all of 5 seconds" would suffice.I despair sometimes
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Vince Hearn Dip2.OSH CMIOSH
It is my understanding that sounders should be set at 5dB above the ambient noise level? 81dB for an office environment seems to be very high. It is the employer's responsibility to reduce noise to a level as low as reasonably practicable (notwithstanding the Action Levels)
Regards
Vince
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Emyr Evans
Why don't you ask the lady to put her fingers in her ears / or place hands over the ears for the short duration of the test.
Provided they are clean - there should not be a hygiene problem (office environment)
This action should allow the noise exposure to be reduced by at least 10dB - cheap, effective & places a small responsibility on the employee to look after her own health.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Toe
Crim
How do you conclude a compensation claim may be on its way soon? It is highly likely that the daily personal exposure limit (LEP,d), and peak sound pressure for this person is below the legal limit.
I can just see the £ signs in the eyes of the claim,s people as millions of people that are subjected to fire alarm testing every week across the country make their claim.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By D H
Toe - if I was the person concerned and constantly on tenderhooks or of a nervous disposition, then the fact I have told my boss about my worries and he has done nothing about it and it continues, what do you expect??
I still believe the sounder is the problem and I aim to check this with my own company.
Every Tuesday we get a tannoy alert to state the test will be done - office environment - and to take no action.
I recall last week they had the anouncement but I cannot recall hearing the alarm test!!
Wonder how many others did. I believe though that the alarm would be enough to alert everyone if it was constant and I would rate it at ~ 65dB - no meter available.
Dave
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By martinw
Toe
it only takes a person to convince a doctor that their hearing has been damaged by sitting below a fire alarm week in week out with nothing having been done about it done about it despite complaining. Same person goes to a lawyer who gets a report from the doctor. Court case ensues.
dB level is not always necessarily the issue. Unless the person claiming hearing problems has a history of hearing tests which most of us do not, you cannot prove that the alarm sounder did NOT cause hearing impairment. That is where the compensation aspect comes in. Can you prove that the person's hearing was not damaged? I know that I cannot.
There are a number of ailments which cannot be disproved such as nerve pain - no matter how many scans you get or how many consultants say that nothing was found, if the person says that it hurts, then what do you do?
How about a chat with the insurers of the building? May help the landlord see sense.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Toe
Just a thought, has there been any previous cases/claims of this?
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.