Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 02 September 2009 15:13:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Buzz Can anyone comment on whether manufacturer's information on vibration levels is becomming more accurate these days and if so, whether doubling the m/s2 figures is something we should still be doing or is it just better to get the kit monitored in the first place for accurate magnitudes?
Admin  
#2 Posted : 02 September 2009 16:55:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Ron Hunter HSE's own guidance points to use of a doubling of manufacturer's figures. Seems reasonable to work on that basis, at least until proper field measurements can be carried out; or where more accurate, valid information cannot be obtained elsewhere. Quite often manufacturer's data can be termed "accurate" as the measurements have been conducted in accordance with the relevant EN/ISO Standard.That doesn't necessarily make them "meaningful" in real life/real use situations though!
Admin  
#3 Posted : 02 September 2009 18:53:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Phil Rose As Ron says the doubling is an HSE recommendation. I went to a vibration seminar run by EFF/HSE a couple of years or so back and the HSE 'guru' said that vibration measurements were in general not very accurate or reliable and that the same piece of kit could have the vibration measured on a number of consecutive occasions with considerable variation in the results. So, you might find that doubling the manufacturers data may be a reasonable way forward and unless you have reason to believe that the vibration levels are in reality considerably less then you may want to save your money and use already published data.
Admin  
#4 Posted : 02 September 2009 19:05:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Seamus O Sullivan At a seminar I attended a few months ago, a student gave the results of her research, she found .... the manufacturer's data did not reflect the true levels,,,,, and found that the levels differed between operators. So you should not rely on the manufacturer's data. I suppose it is like being told the fuel consumption for a car, it varies due to many factors. Of course another factor is that the levels will deteriorate as the machine gets older, and worn. Just to add more discussion, should all equipment be checked for vibration levels??? If not, why not???
Admin  
#5 Posted : 02 September 2009 21:14:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Larry The ISO standard used does not give a true figures. Too many adjustable variables. Quick answers 1. NO. Avoid/run away from/steer clear of manufacturers figures. Double them, but only as an interim measure. 2. Yes. Get "true" figures.
Admin  
#6 Posted : 02 September 2009 21:18:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Colm Sharkey Lads Are you aware that a new EU standard came into law in 2006, Which get over the on site measuring. EN60745 is the latest revision take measurements in all three axes into account, under laboratory conditions comparable to real-life conditions. The employer may use these trlaxial vibration values for preliminary assessment of vibration exposure for his employees. Where their is no triaxial vibration values are available the value can be estimated as follows, Take the single-axis vibration value given in the operating instructions Multiply it by 2 ( for rotary and combi-hammers and reciprocating saw) or by 1.5 for all other tools. This is your new real life measurement.
Admin  
#7 Posted : 02 September 2009 21:39:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Larry BUT. How do you calculate the vibration figure from part worn tools.
Admin  
#8 Posted : 03 September 2009 08:37:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Bob Youel Its the personal dose to the individual person concerned that counts [I have attended enough claim cases to appreciate the situation] and such dose measurements are only obtainable if on site monitoring takes place in 'real' working conditions Years ago [midd 1990's] grinders & jack hammers were hung from string etc / mowing machines were used over special grass so as the levels obtained were indicating 'low' - I know because I was present during such tests! All the above said please use common sense
Admin  
#9 Posted : 03 September 2009 15:37:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By ian cowe We've had our hand held powered equipment tested on a number of occasions by a specialist consultant and in some cases the readings have indeed been almost double those quoted by manufacturers.
Users browsing this topic
Guest (2)
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.