Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 03 September 2009 15:50:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Paul Durkin Hi All, Do not have my copy of L8 to hand, but can you inform me if there is duty / time scale?(week/ month/6months?) when flushing / chlorination of a buildings water system should be done,regardless of complexity, before re-occupation. Kind Regards,Paul
Admin  
#2 Posted : 03 September 2009 16:10:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By JohnMackie Paul, Is the L8 not available as a free download from the HSE? now that 01/09 has passed us by. Sorry i couldn't be of more asistance. Perhaps another more informed member could elaborate. cheers
Admin  
#3 Posted : 03 September 2009 16:57:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Stephen Mitchell Paul Whilst you have stated “regardless of complexity”, IMHO one would need to consider what the possibility of legionella bacteria entering the system during the period of non occupancy might be; bearing in mind of course that legionella bacterium may be present in domestic cold water supply, albeit in very low numbers. It is also worth remembering that in ideal conditions, such as if nutrients are present and water temperature is ideal, then the number of legionella bacteria present could have doubled every 12 hours. Therefore again IMHO you will not find an exact answer in L8, but will have to base what actions (cleaning, flushing, chlorination etc) on…………yes you’ve guessed it your “assessment of the risk”. Cheers Steve
Admin  
#4 Posted : 03 September 2009 17:05:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Jay Joshi L 8 can be accessed at:- http://www.hse.gov.uk/pubns/priced/l8.pdf
Admin  
#5 Posted : 04 September 2009 14:25:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Paul Durkin Thanks All, At work,I make a point of warning staff returning from hols about draining /hot flushing(no pun)their domestic showers.In the past many staff returning from (long) hols find themselves sick (no pun)Hence,I make it a principle after my (short) hols of following that example and also allowing my wife to shower first,you may know why !!!Hence, the question is there any prescribed time(weeks / months) a policy should be set when buildings are left unoccupied for their water system to be flushed / chlorinated? Presume not,it's down to good practice.Children and women first!!!Yes it's Friday. Regards,Paul
Admin  
#6 Posted : 07 September 2009 13:36:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By TT Don't know your exact situation but if you know that a building is going to be left 'dormant' for a period of time and then re-occupied, you should really arrange for flushing of all outlets etc. to take place weekly during that dormant period as per L8. Its irrelevant that the building is empty. Letting legionella multiply prior to re-occupation is likely to be frowned upon.... If the building has sat empty for a while and will therefore have stagnating water in the pipes, you're best off assuming legionella proliferation has occurred and to instigate a chlorination/thermal disinfection of the system prior to re-occupation. Aerosol generation during the running of outlets must be minimised - take shower heads/spray tap heads off and disinfect/descale separately etc. Course it still all depends how long its all been stagnating, what water temperatures in the building are etc. Risk assessment on that basis.
Admin  
#7 Posted : 07 September 2009 13:41:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By TT Just realised you may have been asking about how long prior to re-occupation that controls should start. I don't think L8 will give you an answer on that because it recommends regular flushing etc. Chlorination only to be undertaken when a problem is found or expected. I would recommend doing it at least 2 weeks prior to re-occupation and then instigating a full scheme of precautions to include flushing every week of little used outlets. By doing it 2 weeks in advance you could also take several legionella samples from different outlets/tanks and help demonstrate that the system is clear of legionella (hopefully). Its a 10 day turn around on the samples in the lab. Things to consider would include who is using the water prior to re-occupation as you may have furniture movers etc. on site using toilets/sinks.
Admin  
#8 Posted : 07 September 2009 14:23:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By GJB Davis "It is also worth remembering that in ideal conditions, such as if nutrients are present and water temperature is ideal, then the number of legionella bacteria present could have doubled every 12 hours." Legionella cells divide approximately every 30 minutes. Therefore 1 bacterial cell may become 8,388,608 in 12 hours (give or take a few). cheers Giles
Admin  
#9 Posted : 07 September 2009 15:11:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Paul Durkin Thanks again, From what you guys advise,if we have a planned re-occupation,then at least two weeks before we should,flush the stagnant water system.Regard,shower use,when,I know showers are little used ,I tend to have them drained and the shower-heads,sealed in plastic bags that way,use can be monitored. Regards,Paul
Admin  
#10 Posted : 07 September 2009 15:21:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By TT If you have reason to suspect a problem may exist then you may want to start earlier...you could have biofilm in certain pipework stretches or in tanks that end up requiring greater attention as they serve to act as a legionella reservoir. A decent biofilm can resist thermal and chemical disinfection and requires extra effort such as biodispersant, mechanical cleaning or in worst cases, replacement of pipework. Perhaps wise to do some sampling in advance to help ascertain the extent of any problem? Advise legionella and TVC as a minimum across a range of outlets.
Admin  
#11 Posted : 07 September 2009 15:52:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Paul Durkin Thanks again TT,as you recommend testing what's the feel for a bad bug count CFU/ml? Is 10(good)100(bad)and 1,000(ugly)i.e. immediate decontamination,presume some bugs are always found LLD. Regards,Paul
Admin  
#12 Posted : 07 September 2009 16:35:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By TT Happily L8 gives the guidance for you on this one. More than 100 but less than 1000 legionella cfu/l: If one or two samples positive then review control measures, if majority positive then colonisation of system likely and disinfection should be considered. More than 1000: Resample and risk assess to identify further remedial actions necessary (likely an immediate disinfection says TT). You wouldn't normally sample for TVC in a hot/cold water system but if its sat stagnating for a while then it can help to give you an idea of bacterial growth as the water should be supplied to you via the mains as 'fit to drink'. Legionella is not always easy to sample for, even when its there. If you're over 10 to the 4 TVC then you're into needing to take some kind of action territory (were it for a cooling tower). Over 10 to the 6 and you're into immediate disinfection territory. UKAS labs should provide advice on whether the result is satisfactory or not and if you're using a Legionella Control Association accredited contractor to sample then they will also likely advise too.
Admin  
#13 Posted : 08 September 2009 09:37:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Paul Durkin Thanks again TT for your very useful responses. Regards,Paul
Users browsing this topic
Guest (2)
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.