Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Andrew Kelleher
Hi
My employer operates a laboratory for the analysis of haz/non-haz waste. Due to the number of different samples being tested in the lab (these change on a daily basis) we are finding it very difficult to perform a COSHH assessment on each type of waste sample. Can anyone suggest an alternative approach (Is a generic assessment acceptable??).
Thanks
Andy
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By FAH
Hi again Andrew - how did the PPE issue go?
This is a difficult question with a potentially wide range of essentially acceptable responses. There isn't really the correct place to go into a case-specific response, so the remainder of my comment is rather general.
You can only reasonably be expected to produce CoSHH RAs for substances that are foreseeable and identifiable. Producing CoSHH RAs for mixtures is inherently more difficult - especially where the mixture may contain a range of substances, & quantities of those substances.
With that in mind, I believe that your best option may be to develop a range of generic CoSHH [& associated] RAs for the principal groupings of substances/mixtures likely to be encountered that have the inbuilt proviso of being created to assist in recognising individual substances, & quantities, outside of the RA paramenters as they might be identified during the lab process.
For the remainder, I would suggest adoption of a "research" standard CoSHH RA approach which suspects that certain characteristics may be present & proceeds on the basis that a higher level of protection will be applied until the evidence shows that a lower level may be appropriate.
Hope this helps.
Frank Hallett
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Posted By Jay Joshi
We are an R & D company and often, the formulations made and substances synthesized require testing for even determining the aspects that would have input into compilation of MSDS's
Our top level general risk assessments are for the use of the testing equipment. This is supplemented by COSHH Assessments. Depending upon how the formulations and substances are handled (most are liquids), and the quantities and likely characteristics, a decision is taken whether the activity is in a proper fume cupboard or on the bench, with either LEV type fume extraction or just general ventilation as the lab space has certain minimum air changes via an air handling system.
In case of "unknown" substances that are likely to have a higher risk, the activity will be carried out in a fume cupboard--so that takes care of inhalation risk, but you also have to look at contact with skin, primarily hands and selection, use and disposal of gloves becomes critical.
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.