Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Admin  
#1 Posted : 30 September 2009 13:52:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Kate Graham I'm putting together some tips for effective radio communication during emergencies. I know some of what I want to include but does anyone know of a good brief guide that I could check against please? Cheers.
Admin  
#2 Posted : 30 September 2009 13:59:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Brian Horrocks First few steps 1. Ensure the batteries are good and put them into the radio correctly. 2. Tune radio on 3. Tune to correct frequency
Admin  
#3 Posted : 30 September 2009 14:00:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By John Packer Hi Kate, do you use radio's as an everday part of your job?
Admin  
#4 Posted : 30 September 2009 14:07:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Raymond Rapp Not aware of any specific guidance but I am sure it is out there. From past experience I would say the need for clear communications is imperative - obvious I know, but still sometimes forgotten! That is, the responder repeating the information or instruction if it is safety critical, not being afraid to clarify a message, ensure safety critical messages short and to the point, speak in plain English and without the use of jargon. I personally am not in favour of using the phonetic alphabet unless it is absolutely necessary, staff have been trained and assessed in its use. Good starters I hope. Ray
Admin  
#5 Posted : 30 September 2009 14:24:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By John Packer Kate, What I'm trying to get to (and which Ray has also intimated) is the importance of clear communication. As somebody who frequently uses radio for communication during emergencies in a role outside of work the most important thing is practice, practice, practice. You shouldn't have to think about how to use the radio under these circumstances it should be instinctive. Over!
Admin  
#6 Posted : 30 September 2009 14:39:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By steve e ashton Kate: Is this for terrestrial or Marine Radio? Long Range or Short Range? If Marine - then the RYA booklet that is normally provided during training for the operator short range certificate of competence (a legal requirement for all users) is excellent. Course topics include: the basics of radio operation the correct frequencies (channels) to be used distress, emergency and medical assistance procedures making ship to shore telephone calls Digital Selective Calling (DSC) using simulators Global Maritime Distress and Safety System (GMDSS) Emergency Position Indicating Radio Beacons (EPIRB) Search and Rescue (SART) The test includes use of phonetic alphabet and etc, and has much that could be directly transferred to any notes on the use of terrestrial - based radio. The RYA booklets can be seen here:http://www.rya.org.uk/shop/pages/product.aspx?pid=G22(RYADefaultCatalog)&mode=t&type=BK(RYADefaultCatalog) Hope this helps. Steve
Admin  
#7 Posted : 30 September 2009 15:02:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Kate Graham Ray, that's just the sort of thing I have in mind - what to say / not say and how to word it. I couldn't agree more about the benefits of practice - what I'm formulating at the moment is the learning we have had from drills (lots!), I'm making it specific to our site but I'm looking for something to check against to see what I may have left out. It's for both regular radio users and (more so) those who would mainly use a radio in an emergency or a drill.
Admin  
#8 Posted : 30 September 2009 15:08:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By John Packer Hi Kate, Starting to get the picture and it doesn't sound entirely dissimilar to my own in our HQ. I'm not sure what country you are in and so I don't know what frequency or power output you are allowed. I'm assuming you are in the UK or NI and are using PMR or have you got licensed radios?
Admin  
#9 Posted : 30 September 2009 15:20:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Raymond Rapp Kate, pleased to assist. Some good points also posted by others. I would also add that any procedure should take into account strength of signal, handing over radio equipment, failure of equipment and back up eg mobile phone. Unfortunately, sod's law dictates that things go wrong with equipment/transmissions when you least want it to.
Admin  
#10 Posted : 30 September 2009 15:38:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By John J Kate, before I add anything and take you off track, are you looking specifically at one to one communication or as part of an emergency exercise i.e several radios communicating to a control room? John
Admin  
#11 Posted : 30 September 2009 17:01:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Kate Graham Thanks for all the advice so far. Yes, the situation is an emergency control room plus several other radios around the site (muster point, forward control point, security, etc) normally on an open channel. Scenario could be a major accident. Procedures are in place, I'm looking for a do say this / don't say that sort of list to compare against. And yes I do realise now I should have said all this in the first place!
Admin  
#12 Posted : 30 September 2009 17:34:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Adam Worth Hi Kate My experience of this is emphasis on the importance of not using names, and use of code words for condition of casualties. (The press are listening!) Also ensure a set procedure for reporting the number of missing persons. I have observed a few major exercises under COMAH and both times (for example) the ambulance crew reported 1 casualty, the site controller reported 1 person with ambulance crew - how many people is that? I also trialled some excellent noise reducing headsets, they amplified speech and allowed comfortable radio com ms. these were not only good for Bronze but excellent for incident controller in Silver as he could clearly hear everything that was going on. Also ensure operators are aware of importance code words such as PRIORITY so that important messages can get through. I'm waffeling now and it's time to be at home - I hope that's helpfull.
Admin  
#13 Posted : 30 September 2009 17:39:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By John Packer Ok, I'm sure others are posting as I write so I expect there will be some repitition; Always start by calling the name (or call sign) of the person you are calling and state who you are. For example; "Hello Kate this is John. Over" Kate know nows that someone called John is trying to contact her specifically. Saying 'Over' at the end of your sentence indicates to the person you are talking to that you have finished and that it is their turn to talk. Always acknowledge the person who has called you with their name/callsign and confirm that you are the correct receipient by using your own. Example; "Hello John this is Kate. Go ahead over" John now knows that he has Kates attention and that Kate is listening intently. From this point on each would normally start each sentence only using their own name/callsign. Example; "From John. Can you let me know how many evacuees you have at your location? Over" Response; "This is Kate. I have 29 evacuees at my location" When asking detail questions like this it is best practice for the person asking the question to confirm the answer. Example; "From John. I understand you have 29 evacuees. That is two nine evacuees. Correct? Over" Response; "From Kate. Yes, Yes correct. Two Nine evacuees. Over" Now that John has the information he was after it is important to close the conversation so that Kate knows the conversation is over and everyone else on the net can start transmitting any messages or questions that they have. Example; "Ok Kate thank you. John to standby (or John Clear or John out)" Response; "Kate to standby (or alternative)" Do's Listen first! transmitting when someone else is already transmitting will usually result in nobody hearing anything! Speak clearly and don't rush! Keep it short and to the point! someone else on the net may be waiting to say something important! Tell everyone or the net controller if there is one if you are not going to be able to transmit for a while. Don'ts Swear! apart from being unneccessary its against the law. Butt in on another conversation. If you feel you have something to add, wait until the conversation has finished and then raise the query or add your point. Try to avoid using 'Roger' as a conformation. Especially if you have a radio operator called Roger.(it causes nearly as much confusion as "fire at Will"). Make sure everyone knows what channel they are meant to be operationg on. Then if the radio gets knocked off channel they'll be able to figure out why its all gone quite. And finally. If you need to make an announcement to everyone on the net then address it to; "All Stations on this net from Kate. End Ex. Out".
Admin  
#14 Posted : 30 September 2009 18:47:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By John Packer Adam is quite right in suggesting that you be careful about what you say over an open net but be cautious about using code words. using code or encrypting messages is a breach of the conditions of the open license and an offence under the Wireless Telegraphy Act. Its a clever game of using normal phrases with cryptic meanings. for example if I send a message to my controller stating that I require police supervisory presence at my location. He knows that what I really mean is I've found a body. However, If for example I say "Code Indigo, my location" I'm actually committing an offence. If your working in realtivley close proximity to the others on the net, for instance on the same site, then consider the use of runners to send sensative information. Or if the mobile pohne system still works, use that as it secure from all except the security forces. Oh! and another don't; Don't drop the radios. Very few of them bounce well!
Admin  
#15 Posted : 30 September 2009 21:16:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By SNS Lots of good stuff so far. A fair guide is at http://www.aidworkers.ne...security/radioprocedures Radio discipline is one of the most important aspects otherwise no-one hears anything. If testing the newtwork allocate each operator a specific place in the order so that if one misses the call you will know who and where they are. Various standards exist for callsign allocation, you could use simple numbers or combinations of letters and numbers or names and numbers. Google has a few examples including those used by the police and some military type guidance. OK Out
Admin  
#16 Posted : 01 October 2009 08:32:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By Kate Graham That's all great stuff - thankyou very much.
Admin  
#17 Posted : 01 October 2009 09:33:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By John Richards It also depends on which particular system you will be using. I presume you will be using "off the shelf" PMR446 stuff. If so, get the ones with CTCSS (tone squelch) or DCS (digital coded squelch) installed. It makes life easier and enables more secure communication with less problems with other users of the system. Better still, use a commercial system.
Admin  
#18 Posted : 01 October 2009 13:08:00(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Admin

Posted By John J Kate, Any member on your team should be able to ask for a time out. This allows facts to be gathered and digested.During this period there should be radio silence unless something critical occurs that needs communicating. Frustrating as it may be to those waiting to continue it avoids mistakes and speeds up the whole procedure if adopted correctly, John
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.