Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
EyeSee  
#1 Posted : 02 November 2009 09:26:55(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
EyeSee

One of our fabricators has asked if its safe to use compressed air (that they use for their tools) to blow off any odd bits of aluminium swarf that may be on their overalls after they've finished work every day?
David Bannister  
#2 Posted : 02 November 2009 09:41:59(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
David Bannister

I've always felt that sucking is a better option than blowing i.e. a vacuum cleaner will not only remove the swarf but also collect it and prevent it being blown around, possibly in to eyes or other delicate parts. Furthermore, the compressed air itself is hazardous and if injected under skin is potentially very dangerous, leading to embolism, stroke etc. This is a distinct possibility when using air at factory pressures (8 bar or thereabouts) close to skin surfaces.

Advice therefore is a strong "don't do it". Use a brush if necessary but blowing swarf around is best avoided. The vacuum approach applies equally to clearing swarf (and any other solids) off machine surfaces and the floor.
JARL Solutions  
#3 Posted : 02 November 2009 10:50:07(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
JARL Solutions

NO NO NO .... Blowing down overalls oxygenates the fibres of the coveralls an makes them significantly more flammable even if they are antiflam coveralls. This has always been significant risk at a fabricators with grinding sparks, welders etc.

If the guys don't believe you, organise a demonstration (with full consideration of the risks of course).

Stuff4blokes is correct use a vacuum cleaner is best, he has many valid points in his response.
EamonM  
#4 Posted : 02 November 2009 12:13:45(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
EamonM

I agree with the previous posts apart from not knowing where the swarf will go there is also the issue of other dust and dirt being blown into eyes of bystanders when this action is being taken. As a newly employed apprentice (an age ago now) compressed air was used to clean overalls which were covered in sugar dust and a number of staff complained of getting it in their eyes due to the cloud of dust generated.
CFT  
#5 Posted : 02 November 2009 19:05:42(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
CFT

Never, not never is the advice I give to clients. Simply can't control to any level of sensibility.

Jobley
traumatech  
#6 Posted : 03 November 2009 23:33:05(UTC)
Rank: New forum user
traumatech

glencoe,

Its only possible to "oxygenate" the fibres of coveralls if you are using enriched compressed air (i.e over atmospheric 21% O2) It doesnt happen with standard compressed air.

Phil
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.