Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
clegg1966  
#1 Posted : 05 November 2009 12:24:07(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
clegg1966

I am lokking at ways to deliver health and safety training in-house by training in the CIEH accredited training scheme. The question is over asbestos awareness courses. Does anyone know if the above accreditation would allow me to presdent a course on basic asbestos awareness?
boblewis  
#2 Posted : 05 November 2009 12:34:49(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
boblewis

The basic requirement for any asbestos trainer is a measurable degree of competene in the subject and a simple training background is not sufficient in my mind. The best trainers I know have all had significant experience with asbestos work prior to starting to train. I personally had asbestos removal teams under me for H&S for more than 10 years prior to starting any training in awareness of asbestos. Currently UKATA operate the only recognised approval of trainers in this field and they will cover basic awareness but asbestos essentials and removal work trainers must go through their scheme. I am sure DW will correct me if I am wrong here. Bob
clegg1966  
#3 Posted : 05 November 2009 12:55:54(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
clegg1966

Hi. Just to make it clear the training session would be basic asbestos awareness and not removal which would be done by UKATA approved trainers. this is just a basic awareness course which is a H&S awareness course which lasts for aprox 2.5 hours.
Clairel  
#4 Posted : 05 November 2009 13:06:56(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Clairel

Clegg, I'm not sure I understand your post. Do you mean the Professional Trainer Cerificate (which you need before being allowed to present CIEH courses)? All that is, is a trainng certificate (in my opinion I found the course to be a waste of time but gave a me a piece of paper at the end). However, in disagreement with the previous post I don't see why anyone who understands the basics about asbestos (and also has some skills in giving training) can't give training on asbestos awareness. There is certainly no legal requirement for any particular qualification to give asbestos awareness training that I am aware of.
boblewis  
#5 Posted : 05 November 2009 16:18:13(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
boblewis

Clairel As usual I was expressing my personal views when it comes to which trainers I have found to be best. WRT Removal and essentials however the HSE are making it clear that they expect UKATA accreditation in order to provide the training. The basic awareness course can be done by any competent person in asbestos who can also train competently. I am concerned however if people believe the inital awareness training should be less than 1/2 day. Refresher training beyond this can be as much as is required - as I have previously stated in earlier threads on the old forum, the more people encounter asbestos the less time refresher training takes as they have better recall of the information Bob
smith6720  
#6 Posted : 05 November 2009 17:41:00(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
smith6720

clegg1966 wrote:
I am lokking at ways to deliver health and safety training in-house by training in the CIEH accredited training scheme. The question is over asbestos awareness courses. Does anyone know if the above accreditation would allow me to presdent a course on basic asbestos awareness?
Claire As far as I am aware if it is an in house asbestos awareness presentation there is no formal qualification, As long as you have a reasonable understanding of asbestos regulations and your company is happy for you to deliver, I dont see any issues. Smudger
Clairel  
#7 Posted : 05 November 2009 19:08:53(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Clairel

Smudger, thought that's what I said??
pl53  
#8 Posted : 06 November 2009 08:54:42(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
pl53

I don't agree that the CIEH Trainer's Certificate is a waste of time. When I did it I found it to be quite useful. It certainly leads you away from the "Powerpoint for everything" type of training and makes you think about how to accomodate different learnig styles and preferences. I am currently looking at some of our in-house courses to see how I can use 4MAT to make them more user friendly.
Clairel  
#9 Posted : 06 November 2009 09:01:48(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Clairel

Peter, I think it depends on your background. For me I learnt nothing new as I had already been taught it all previously and had some experience. But, for me, it gave me the piece of paper to say I was an accredited trainer. I'm sure others may find it useful but many won't.
MikeSweeney  
#10 Posted : 06 November 2009 09:08:53(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
MikeSweeney

This subject is very appropriate at the moment. CHAS and SafeContractor are both interpreting CAR2006 very broadly as regards to refresher training in Asbestos Awareness. They have widened the scope of the definition "may come into contact with" to include some of my clients who are unlikely to come into contact with asbestos but, according to them, must have training. I could reduce this to the absurd by stating that the girl in the newsagents I went to this morning may be asked to knock in a nail to hang up a calender and become exposed. Does she require training? I have made this point in another posting but with regards to training, as professionals we surely should be able to accredit our own work (other than statutory requirements such as GasSafe, Electricity, First Aid etc) after assessing the requirements, the course content and the understanding. After all, we are the ones who may have to justify our decisions in court - just like real professionals!! With regards to the HSE requiring formal qualifications to provide Asbestos Awareness Training (a topic I have heard before and supported by vested interests) given the broad definition of those affected I imagine this would require annual training for many millions of people and make someone a very good living. As I said, reductio ad absurdum (though I may apply for the job!)
Birchall31628  
#11 Posted : 06 November 2009 10:07:57(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Birchall31628

I was of the opinion that the HSE do not endorse the requirement to use UKATA members for asbestos related training. I have certainly been quoted this by Inspectors in the past. However, I do see, strangely enough, that they appear to endorse UKATA on the HSE's web site with it's current campaign.
boblewis  
#12 Posted : 07 November 2009 11:22:00(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
boblewis

Mike In defence of CHAS & SafeContractor both are assessing people who are performing works on structures and unless an organisation is able to demonstrate its activities will not lead to asbestos exposure, ie via the nature of the work, there would be a need for training. We should also remember that when it comes to CDMC and designer works both of these can be regarded as in some way contributing to the management and assessment of asbestos by the clientand/or Contractor. As for the trainer competence I stand by my expressed view, remembering competence = combination of Skills, Knowledge, Ability, Training and Experience plus attitude and behaviours (HSE do use this definition in Competence Management for Safety Related Control Systems etc guidance). Far too often trainers I have encountered rely purely on one aspect alone to claim competence. Bob
Dave Wilson  
#13 Posted : 11 November 2009 11:15:18(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
psychodada

Been very busy lately! UKATA (non Profit making) is a new association which people can join who deliver any type of Asbestos training, you can join at different levels depending on what type of course you intend to present from licensed to Awareness. (This used to be a sub group of the ALG called the Asbestos Training Providers Working Group (ATPWG) and the HSE were part of this. All members of UKATA have their Trainers, training materials and venue "independently" audited so that it complies with an 'agreed standard', obviously the stringency of standards vary dependant on the type of course you intend to deliver, once this is completed you can put the UKATA logo on your Training material and certificates. There is NO legal requirement to use a UKATA training organisation much the same as there is no legal requirement to use PASMA or IPAF etc however this is the 'industry best practice' you are free to do what you want. Conversely how do organisations who have signed up to SSIP know that the level of training in asbestos is suitable and sufficient when they carry out your assessments. As far as a person hanging a picture this has not a lot to do with training in asbestos this is covered in the Duty to manage and the LEGAL requirement that people 'Manage asbestos' and part of this is telling people where it is in the property, if this was AIB would you allow this/ How many people will be sticking pins in AIB etc during the XMAS period, think about that!
Dave Wilson  
#14 Posted : 11 November 2009 11:17:33(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
psychodada

psychodada is DW
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.