Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Lee Mac  
#1 Posted : 14 November 2009 11:39:05(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Lee Mac

Hi All Would you say this is the view of the majority or the minority of the general public? Should we challenge this notion or say nothing and actually prove this notion to the contrary. I have been in H&S now for a decade and I am seeing and hearing this notion both in the media and in the workplace more and more frequently. I am begining to wonder is there a high number of professionals who are being over zealous such as the well documented conkers scenario. Of course I imagine we would all like to believe we do not fall into that category. I have been attending Project Team meetings over the last number of months, in my capacity as a SHEQ Manager for the Principal Contractor. The CDM-C has confirmed he is content with the standard of the Construction Phase Plan and the practices he has noted thus far. However on a regular basis he brings different ACoPs (full versions) to meetings and hands out copies to everyone. It has become a running joke amongst most of the team but it has become an embarrassment to me as a professional. In my view we are supposed to have the knowledge to assist and workplaces under our control are compliant with current legislative requirements using a common sense approach- not by quoting legislation. Today I read an article on this website about Terry Wogan saying instead of throwing a Guy F on top of the bonfire we should throw a H&S prof- and someone has responded quoting accident/mortaility figures. Now I may not agree with Mr Wogan in his remark but I am wondering are we stoking the media fires and a general view by actually responding continually to these flippant remarks made by various media vehicles and making life worse for ourselves rather than ensuring that we continue to improve on current stats and workplace attitudes. # I would be interested in hearing the view from this forum. Am I loosing my mind- perhaps!!lol Lee
Brett Day SP  
#2 Posted : 15 November 2009 03:12:46(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Brett Day SP

Why do you view him as an embarressment? I have a poratble hard drive with all the ACoPs on electronically, that I pay per copy made, I found as a CDM-C and as they guy visiting site that many companies (especially the smaller ones had all the ACoPs at head office and if the site manager or design team there was a real faff to find the relevant info. With my docs carried in the car it was a 60 second process to find the info and give the site manager a copy for future reference - something that may have been ignored to avoid the faff of getting someone at head office to hunt stuff out got actioned. Granted handing out ACoPs isn't the cheapest way to 'improve awareness' but in the 12 years I've been doing construction related safety I've seen an awfull lot of assumptions regarding knowledge. What do you do to ensure that all on the team are current? Have you discussed the CDM-C's actions with him and asked why he does this? That might be a better place to start. For what it's worth there are some anoraks around - I'm one in several areas (especialy when it comes to bushcraft), however, my 'anorakness' (if there is such a term) when I'm teaching bushcraft is held in awe and respect. Yet as a safety professional it's seen as a bad thing. we are dammed if we do and dammed if we don't. So now it doesn't bother me - I do what I do to the best of my abilities, if that makes me an anorak so be it.
Safety Smurf  
#3 Posted : 15 November 2009 12:40:26(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Safety Smurf

My collegues constantly rib me for being an anorak and I play to it, it adds a bit of fun to the working day. As well as helping to maintain a good working relationship it also works to my advantage. When I 'take my anorak off' they know and trust me enough to take my word on a subject and get things done. I have a remarkable ability to be able to recall (and in a lot of cases recite) a lot of the H&S legislation that relates to our business (OMG I am an Anorak!). They laugh and they rib me but they always rely on me for the answer. Having been with the same company for a relatively long time (top ten longest servers in a head count of 3.5k) I am also used as a historical database and have saved the company tens if not hundreds of thousands in informing them of historical mistakes that they may be about to repeat (not just H&S ones). In short, they laugh at my anorak but they appreciate it, trust and use it! Unfortunatley there are people who take life too seriously and they do us no good at all! As for the media. I can't speak about all of them because that would be hypocritical but there are many cases of them attacking anything they can pin a badge on (History repeating). H&S profs, 4x4 drivers, white van man...politicians! If it can be readily identified and pigeon holed it would appear it is fair game for press prejudice which the masses swallow up without question! I suppose we should be thankful we are spread out all over the country 'cause if we all lived in one community it would (ironically) probably be the unsafest place in Britain! I'd better get off of my soapbox now before I breach the work at height regs. I'm now going to don my anorak and go out and look down my nose with derision at BMW drivers! ;-)
David Bannister  
#4 Posted : 15 November 2009 16:41:13(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
David Bannister

I regularly attend a local business group which meets for breakfast and have on a couple of occasions turned up wearing my hi-vis anorak, once also with just about every item of PPE you could think of, although that was for a special presentation on "good health and safety". It gets a laugh and the idea is that they remember their "safety bloke" whenever one of their customers needs some H&S assistance. Hopefully too I'm not seen by them as an anorak.
David Bannister  
#5 Posted : 15 November 2009 16:42:13(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
David Bannister

Although, anyone on this forum at this time on a Sunday afternoon may fairly be said to be exhibiting anorakish tendencies!
Safety Smurf  
#6 Posted : 15 November 2009 17:04:21(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Safety Smurf

Doh! Spotted. Quick, wheres my camouflage anorak? There, that's better. Now you can't see me ;-)
DavidBrede  
#7 Posted : 15 November 2009 17:14:20(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
DavidBrede

As a practicing CDM C I often come across projects where the contractors debate why they are asked for specific things to be provided, welfare facilities are a case in point. So it is useful to have access to ACOPs and HSE guidance to illustrate points. If you are troubled by what the CDM C is doing then why not ask him?
broadvalley  
#8 Posted : 16 November 2009 08:41:54(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
broadvalley

It probably is true that the public perception of a H&S Prof is an "Anarack" I'm afraid it is probably true in some cases - but then so it is with other professions. Just a question of not getting too petty in our dealings and keeping our credibility.
DEC1888  
#9 Posted : 16 November 2009 09:35:13(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
DEC1888

Brett Where did you get all the ACOS from ? Dec
DEC1888  
#10 Posted : 16 November 2009 09:36:17(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
DEC1888

Sorry ACOPS ta
BJC  
#11 Posted : 16 November 2009 09:49:27(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Guest

I occasionally come across these types who normally are either academic with no real experience or uncouth individuals who wouldnt normally be managerial material were they not in HS.
RayRapp  
#12 Posted : 16 November 2009 10:22:36(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
RayRapp

I'm probably an anorak and proud of it. Yes, h&s has a poor name in some quarters but so have a number of other occupations. I was formely a train driver (wrong type of snow) and whenever there were problems with the service I would get it in the neck from friends and family. I think there are far too many who defualt to over zealous safety, I am definately not one of them. Indeed, I do wonder whether I am too relaxed when I read of other examples. However, those that turn their nose up at safety are usually at the front of the cue when the proverbial hits the fan. Life is full of hypocrisy - don't let get it get you down. Meanwhile a bit of fun - sent an email to my golfing mates copied from work, where at the bottom was my post nominals including CMIOSH. Some smart Alec offered a prize for the best interpretation and...Carefully Monitoring Idiots Otherwise S Happens. ps - where's the spellchucker? Ray
m  
#13 Posted : 16 November 2009 12:30:52(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
m

So if your colleagues are afraid of anaraks are they suffering from anoraknophobia?
Johnny  
#14 Posted : 16 November 2009 14:17:01(UTC)
Rank: New forum user
Johnny

Dec you can download the ACOPs free from HSE Books http://books.hse.gov.uk/hse/public/home.jsf
Clairel  
#15 Posted : 16 November 2009 15:55:35(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Clairel

For info - some time ago I posted a similar thread about whether some professionals were taking H&S too far by trying to emiminate all risk instead of just managing it to a sensible level. There was mixed response. Anorak - well could anyone who is an 'expert' in their field considered an anorak?? I try not to quote legislation. Had to do it as an inspector in a previous life and saw people's eyes glaze over and now I try really hard not to, unless I am asked specifically. To me, people just want to know what they've got to do and they switch off as soon as you start mentioning Regulations. They employ me as a competent person and so, hopefully, trust my advice, without me having to prove it through quoting legislation at them all the time (I'm a consultant though). I have the opinion that people that feel the need to quote legislation are just trying to prove themselves to be all knowing and better than everyone else. I don't have a desperate need to do that Personally I think giving out copies of ACOP's to be very lazy. They are good reference material for specific groups of people but not for the masses. Expecting others to plow through them is ineffective to my mind. Should we stop behaving so much like anoraks - well that's open to personal opinion. The TV documentary (and remember garden is an anagram for danger!) proved that we all have very different views on how bad that anorak portrayal was for our image as a profession. Me, I just want to help people understand and I don't think sounding like an anorak does that. Seeing me as a real person who can put things in everyday terms is what gets me success. Only the other week one of my clients thanked me enormously for a training session becuase everyone had remained focused, attentive and interested throughout. I was really pleased with that. Keep it real!! BJA, Can I point out that there are quite a few of us that use this forum that have already expressed how fed up we are with the constant example of academics without experience. There are plenty of us academics with experience too. H&S professionals are stereotyped enough by the rest of society without steretyping from within as well.
Barrie(Badger)Etter  
#16 Posted : 16 November 2009 16:10:17(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Barrie(Badger)Etter

Lee Mac wrote:
Hi All Am I loosing my mind- perhaps!!lol Lee
Try working with my non safety boss and then you'll be doing a Wogey saying 'Is it me'? I believe we're all (well most) T.O.G.s and old enough to say 'I don't beeelieevve it!'. Just keep hitting back at the press et al and one day they'll start saying so and so crying wolf due to not wanting to insure or do the risk assmt properly .... one day, one day. Badger
Canopener  
#17 Posted : 16 November 2009 19:07:36(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Canopener

Ok so i'm feeling ever so slightly mischievous tonight. Can somebody please tell me where I can get one of these anoraks with 'Health and Safety Professional' written across the back. Not in the Arco catalogue.
Paul B  
#18 Posted : 16 November 2009 19:36:46(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Paul B

Send me a cheque for £149.99. And you'll Receive your personalised H & S anorak by return of post. (strike action permitting)
kevincw  
#19 Posted : 17 November 2009 08:33:53(UTC)
Rank: New forum user
kevincw

A saying taught to me in my early days doing H&S, if you have to start quoting regulations you have already lost your argument. Over the years I have found this to be completely true. As for the anorak thing you are what you are if that is how you are percieved then either be happy with it or change you outlook. I recently saw a job description for a H&S job and one of the primary attritubes the individual needed was personal courage and a lot of it. Experience may be one thing but being able to back it up is another. kevin
KieranD  
#20 Posted : 17 November 2009 14:45:03(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Guest

Lee You open your piece with the question 'Would you say this is the view of the majority or the minority of the general public?' and then discuss your experience in your particular company; quite understandably most of the commentators do the same. There are misconceptions in your question, as there are a host of viewS, plural, across the 'general public'. How a safety professional influences people in his or her own company (or clients, if he/she serves a variety of clients) is a much more specific question. In their excellent handbook on influencing, ('The Art of Woo. Using Persuasiion to Sell Your Ideas, published by Capstone, 2008) professors Richard Shell and Mario Moussa at Wharton Business School identify six 'channels of persuasion'. They are authority, interest-based inducement, rational merits, inspiration/emotion, relationships and poltical power. The ACOP represents the authority channel; you are free to use the five others.
RayRapp  
#21 Posted : 17 November 2009 21:32:09(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
RayRapp

Kieran, if I did not know you better I would say from your last post that you have been on the drink. With respect, it is better to keep things simple (Kis) sometimes. Ray
Safety Smurf  
#22 Posted : 17 November 2009 23:23:13(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Safety Smurf

RayRapp wrote:
Kieran, if I did not know you better I would say from your last post that you have been on the drink. With respect, it is better to keep things simple (Kis) sometimes. Ray
Firstly; I thought that was an occupational hazard! Secondly; Ray! put the glass down! Step away from th glass! 'Keep things simple' would be 'KTS'. I'm sure you meant to say; 'Keep It Simple, Stupid' (KISS) ;-)
Lee Mac  
#23 Posted : 18 November 2009 11:25:26(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Lee Mac

Thanks for the responses. My view is as simple as this, by merely having a copy of ACoPs distributed at a meeting is not an adequate method of ensuring suitable communication, whatever happened to having a full and frank discussion about the issues in hand. I would not expect a HSE/SHEQ/Envt Manager to throw ACoPs continually at a workforce when they are having meetings with them and the same applies to the CDM-C in question. The reason I do not raise it with the CDM-C in question is that I apply my methods of communication when I convert the principles of theory into practice. I feel that by distributing ACoPs regularly at meetings does nothing to raise the profile of H&S as a subject or us as H&S Professional with others- we need to be able to put information across in a more informative fashion. Lee
RayRapp  
#24 Posted : 18 November 2009 12:43:45(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
RayRapp

Lee I would also add tha ACoPs should not be used verbatum, rather they are designed to be transposed into working documents that apply to all those involved in the process and according to the circumstances. Goog luck.
Users browsing this topic
Guest (2)
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.