Rank: New forum user
|
Whilst channel hopping on Saturday night, I saw a small part of the show and was left wondering how singing and dancing on a 10 ft square platform 8-10 ft off the ground (without fall protection) is allowable under the WAH Regs. I know it was only Jedward, but even they deserve to be protected.
Am I missing something?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
It did catch my attention, especially when they jumped off it. I was left absolutely staggered, though they should have at least doubled the height to give us a realistic chance of getting rid of them for good ;-)
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Montalban.
Are you advocating that there should have been guarding to the platform, or am I missing something?
|
|
|
|
Rank: New forum user
|
ELFY wrote:Montalban.
Are you advocating that there should have been guarding to the platform, or am I missing something?
Yes, I suppose I am. Is the entertainment industry exempt (no I am not trying to be clever)
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
No, the entertainment industry is not exempt. Presumably a suitable and sufficient RA was conducted, the results briefed to Jedward and appropriate controls put in place - and I still believe in Father Xmas!
Ray
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
A similar thought went through my mind whilst watching last night's top gear when driving in a vehicle run by a diesel generator whith fumes filling the inside of the vehicle - not to mention the exposure to the noise without apparent hearing protection.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
scotsam wrote:A similar thought went through my mind whilst watching last night's top gear when driving in a vehicle run by a diesel generator whith fumes filling the inside of the vehicle - not to mention the exposure to the noise without apparent hearing protection. Just to be clear - I wasn't watching it whilst driving the said vehicle. The presenters were in the vehicle...
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Having worked in entertainment and theatres for about 10 years (although not there now), it was perfectly acceptable for performaers to be on a platform, all events of this type are licenced by the local authority through the enetertaiment licence so an independent review is undertaken to an extent.
It's a balance of risk and without it we would not have such performers as acrobats, tight rope walkers or even pole vaultersand high jumpers etc!!
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Montalban wrote:Whilst channel hopping on Saturday night, I saw a small part of the show and was left wondering how singing and dancing on a 10 ft square platform 8-10 ft off the ground (without fall protection) is allowable under the WAH Regs. I know it was only Jedward, but even they deserve to be protected.
Am I missing something?
So what do you want them to do? Climb an internal ladder and exit through a trap hatch? As far as I am aware that type of industry is allowed to provide entertainment such as the dangerous actions on the show as long as during rehearsals adequate protection is provided. If not for the potentially dangerous aspects of that type of stunt entertainment would not be as entertaining as it is.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Goose,
did you say "Balance of risk" without chuckling?
cheers
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Well spotted John, a feather in your cap..
Goose.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
I remember a couple of years ago the accident in the Glasgow Pavilion panto.
The actress who plays Jimmy Krankie climbed a beanpole (obviously playing Jack) and suffered a fall. this resulted in severe (potentially life threatening) injuries. Jimmy Krankie never returned to the panto circuit after this and probably never will (My boys were devastated).
The dangers are just as present on a stage as on a building site.
Son of Skywalker
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.