Rank: Forum user
|
My problem: we have a call centre location which runs 24/7. Daytime provision of first aid is fine, however the complication arises 'out of hours'. We have 14 employees who work night and weekend shifts (3 at night and 2 atweekends); these employees are not static and do rotate. I am trying to find a cost effective solution to first aid provision. The landlord does provide security personnel but these can not be relied upon to be appropriately trained first aiders - we need to find our own solution. The distance from the nearest hospital is reasonable, there is no history of accidents or incidents with these teams and there is no lone working.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
We have 24 hour security on our site and they are all first aid trained - they have agreed to cover our site out of hours (no doubt for a small fee added to their bill). that money gives us the reliability!!! In additon have you thought of training a few people up using the one day appointed person course - gives you all the basics but for a low risk activity like a call centre? It does not matter a jot if you have no history of accidents - it only takes one!!!
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Hi Sharon
I agree with Blodwyn, and have the same arrangement where we have a 24 hr site and the security teams are trained ranging from the simple 1 day emergency to the full first aider.
It may cost you a few £'s per month as a payment suppliment but you know you are covered and compliant.
Good luck
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Hi Sharon The best way of solving your problem is to provide training to your staff, indeed this would be the logical way of fulfilling your risk assessment that has identified the need. This can be effectively done by delivery of a one-day Emergency First Aid at Work course (the Appointed Person course mention elsewhere is no longer valid for your needs). This course can be delivered in various formats; either as block or in small segments. Any reputable training providor would be happy to work around your staffing arrangements. Send me a message if you want detailed advice.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
I fear I am going to fly in the face of 'convention' here. You haven't mentioned what your risk assessment has determined the risk to be, but looking at the few facts that I have I assume that the risk is pretty low. Therefore according to the First Aid ACoP L74 http://www.hse.gov.uk/pubns/l74.pdf (not the new guidance on training requirements) and have a look at appendix 1 on page 24 and then look at the flow chart on page 27, you might well find that you can comply by using an appointed person only. In brief, the flow chart says, low risk environment (offices), with less than 25 employees (at any one time) = at least one appointed person. Note that this flow chart has been updated to take account of the revised guidance on training and includes EFAW as well. If you look at the FAQs for the new guidance http://www.hse.gov.uk/fi...d/review/trainingfaq.htm and the flow chart mention above, you will see that the Appointed Persons roles still remains and remains 'valid' for low risk environments. You should also know that it doesn't take a day to train someone to Appointed person standard. Most providers take a day to do it because they include within that first aid training, but this is not a requirement to become an AP. The AP duties are limited to looking after the first aid kit(s) and calling the emergency services when required. See L74 paras 7 and 67-70. I do not belive that AP's HAVE to go on an HSE approved course to become an AP. I tend to feel that it is good practice to have someone with first aid skills there and therefore I wonder if the EFAW course would be preferable, BUT I suggest that you would be 'covered' and 'compliant', if that is all you are seeking by nominating APs. Allternatively you could nominate APs and give them some basic first aid training commensurate with the likely hazards to be found in the environment.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Hi Sharon
Only 3 people at night and 2 at weekends, who do you train? at the weekend you have a 50% chance the F/A will be the IP. you have considered the hospital distance but what will the responce time be between 2300 - 0300 on a Friday night?
Security staff does seem like your best and most cost effective option
Regards Andy
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Of the 3 at night and 2 at weekends how many are the same people? If the 2 weekenders are the 3 nighters on rotation then send them all on an EFAW course. Esp. as security can be in the wrong place at the wrong time and EFAW training will be a lot less cost wise than a full on F.Aider.
Badger
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Badger
14 employee's on rotation, i suppose the question Sharon has to answer is what level of cover is required, but even though security may be on rounds i still believe they are the best option for full first aid cover
Regards Andy
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Indeed, what level of cover is required? Is there a need for first aiders or would apopointed persons suffice, bearing in mind what I assume is a pretty low risk environment and activity? The ACoP provides guidance on this.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Phil My apologies for posting a misleading comment. You are quite correct the AP syllabus is still valid and available. It however, as you rightly say, does not provide first aid training. In my opinion, as both a trainer, and practicing emergency service operative, the EFAW is the most appropriate route to take. As a professional it is my opinion that anything less is doing an injustice to the clients organisation but also to the individuals as first aid is not just a workplace necessity but a lifeskill. Chris
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Hi Sharon
I don't see that you need to provide any trained first aiders over the weekend / nightshift. Given the level of risk and the numbers involved I would tend to make sure that everyone has been instructed on the role of an appointed person and advise them to call the emergency services in the event of a real emergency.
The 'dayshift' trained first aiders will no doubt look after first aid kits etc.
Carry out a first aid assessment and then you can justify your decision to only have appointed persons.
FH
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
tstc - no problems, while ideally it would be nice to have a first aider around, there are times when it isn't necessary or is impraticable to do so. We have some people that work weekends to clear backlogs of work; it is desk/office based work of a very low risk, the first aid facilities are available and I have no problem with self help if someone cuts a finger and needs a plaster etc.
I tend to agree with fornhelper, an appointed person would be sufficient and that means that they simply have to be appointed to ring the emergency services if needed; something I would have thought they were quite capable of deciding to do without the formality of being appointed. There should be 'ready' access to the first aid facilities though
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
I agree Phil that the need to formally 'appoint' someone to call the emergency services shouldn't be necessary but I think I'm correct in stating that there should be an appointed person 'as a minimum' in each workplace?
In the type of situation Sharon describes then there is no problem having a mix of trained first aiders and APs - and in these situations the APs role would not even involve looking after first aid kit etc.
As I say simply provide all employees with basic instruction of what to do in an emergency and ask that one of them takes charge in the event of any situation arising - so I suppose whoever calls emergency assumes the role of an AP by default.
We do, of course, have trained first aiders where our assessments deem them to be required.
FH
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
fornhelper wrote:I agree Phil that the need to formally 'appoint' someone to call the emergency services shouldn't be necessary but I think I'm correct in stating that there should be an appointed person 'as a minimum' in each workplace?
I don't agree Formhelper. My workplace has 2 persons and has no formally Appointed Person. We have two separate employers and there is often only one of us in at any time. Both my spouse and I are happy with this arrangement, as are our employers.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Apologies Fornhelper, perhaps I need an eye test to drive this DSE.
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.