If something is already in the public domain i.e printed in the Liverpool Echo including the link so the information is obtained from sorce why do you have to lock out the post so we cant comment on it? Where's the breach if its already printed in a newspaper?

Julian I am rather surprised that you have asked the question. Could I suggest that you: a. check the forum rules b. aquaint yourself with the principle of 'sub judice' - a quick google search would lead you in the right direction!

I think many people may feel or see it that way but I think there is a distinction (and accept often a fine line) between the reporting of events connected with a trial and what is essentially relatively 'uncontrolled' discussion about the same on a public forum, to which there is wide access. There are many cases where nationals have been found in contempt and dealt with. Interstingly enough, I note that the Speaker has recently warned MPs about discussing cases sub judice in connection with the 3 MPs on fraud charges over their expenses.

Aghhh, and talking of this. Their there etc etc Hally wanders off to write 100 lines of the chalk board.

I give up. This is what happens when i'm back at work (or is it in work) after two days off sick.

Nope, it's what happens when we don't have an EDIT FUNCTION!! Sorry for shouting but if we SHOUT about it long enough maybe we'll GET ONE. And maybe not.

Essentially, this is the answer to the question. The reporting that there IS a trial in a Newspaper is not the same as talking ABOUT the trial. Allegations about the accused, the evidence etc may be made. Essentially, the contents of the case cannot be discussed until after it has finished. The rest of this topic has wandered well into the long grass now, and I propose to lock it. Jane