Rank: New forum user
|
Can anyone point me in the right direction to find out where it is written down about the safe use of out-riggers on lorry mounted cranes (hi-ab's)
It is common practice for drivers to deploy the outrigers on the side they are off loading to, but, if it is deemed unsafe due to traffic etc they do not deploy the off side. I add that they always deploy all of the feet.
I have been informed that this is bad practice. I would like to have someting in writing to show my superiors.
can anyone help please?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
try manufacturers guidance
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
LOLER Regulation 4 & BS7121 PART 4 Lorry Loaders both mention the requirement for stability when lifting. I would suggest you need the 4 riggers to give you that stability.
The problem arising at present is that there are so many lorry drivers driving vehicles with HI ABS and no Training certificates to allow them to operate them legally.
Regards Alex
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Not sure about the appropriate legislation but I do know when undertaking a Hi-Ab certification course you have to extend all outriggers in th e practical or you fail the course!
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
another thing to consider is chapter 8 as I would argue that 99.9% of such day to day drivers have never heard of the requirement to sign etc properly
|
|
|
|
Rank: New forum user
|
Thank you for your replies and links - I will definately use this forum more in the future
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Guys, it isnt allways practicable, or neccessary to extend the outriggers on side of the vehicle that is not been offloaded over, this will generally create an additional hazard. and really ,who is going to set up a full chapter 8 to offload a vehicle ?, are customers to apply for a 7 day or 28 day traffic management notice to the local council when the order materials,I think not
Manafacturers Guidance..., Like they are going to compromise themselves by saying that you dont need to extend the out riggers.
The solution to this is correct training for operators, by an experienced operator, and some competency checks(IMHO)
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Sorry Dec not looking for confrontation . Clearly stated in Loler Reg 4 under stability if riggers fitted they must be used.
I dont disagree with your comment on proper training by competent people but when the vehicle tips over as it only had 2 legs to stand on, so would the person who allowed it to be used like this.
Not a regulation quoter I am a very practical person who deals daily with the problems you mention but for the initial question from the poster if fitted they need to be used. LOLER.
The fact that Lorry Loaders /HI Abs are now a CPCS category is because they are now capable of lifting in excess of 30 Tons. With only 2 riggers out ?
|
|
|
|
Rank: New forum user
|
I would add that I would be very surprised if any manufacturer gave dispensation not to extend all outriggers. The operators manual would certainly be referred to in case of problems.
Additionally I would also draw attention to the human factors aspect as well. There is no engineered solution that would stop the operator forgetting that he only has the two kerbside outriggers extended, and slewing the jib past the centre point and putting load onto the other side.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
ACOP TO REG 4 OF LOLER states "106 Where the safe use of the lifting equipment depends on the use or
positioning of stabilising arrangements, the equipment should not be used unless these are in place and operating effectively"
Note that it says "Where safe use depends on stabalisation"
There is vast range of these lorry loaders. Some lorry loaders will be capable of lifting some loads without the the use of the outriggers. It depends on the load, jib extention required, and rated capability of the crane / loader.
These cranes / loaders are also fitted with rated capacity indicators or limiters that warn of potential overload or prevents the overload situation.
Steve
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Steve good point but the initial question was where does thebix find it written down that outriggers must be used that question was answered.
Stability is the key without the riggers deployed what is guaranteeing stability?
Overloading is a completely different ball game.
If a lorry loader was to overturn what would the most likliest cause be? (Lack of Stability I would suggest)
This could be caused by a number of things ground collapsing, which would mean ground conditions had not been taken into account?
Still would be deemed lack of stability.
The first question from the men with yellow hats would be did he have his riggers deployed.
Regards Alex
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
The answer depends on the specific crane that is installed on each vehicle.
Some manufacturers offer systems that link outrigger deployment and boom position into the Rated Capacity Indicator. Such that on the side with the outrigger extended you have full capacity, but once the boom is slewed across the centreline of the vehicle onto the side where the outrigger is down but not extended out; the crane is automatically derated to much reduced capacity.
If such a system is not included on your cranes, then the manufacturers will have only given a Rated Capacity [SWL] for the arrangement with both outriggers extended. If you use the crane in any other configuration then it will not have a valid marked rated capacity and you will be in breach of Reg7 LOLER irrespective of whether it was stable or not.
Provided the loads you lift are sufficiently low you could try approaching the manufacturers or an independent lifting engineer and getting the whole crane derated to a capacity that can be safely achieved without extending either outrigger.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Alex
I do apologize for not being clear, i understood Thebix to be asking if the outriggers were to be deployed in a fully extended position away from the lorry on the offside, which as i mentioned is potentially causing another set of hazards.I would fully expect all four legs to be deployed when unloading/loading was in progress, but the offside legs would be deployed in their static position so to speak, thus giving stability but not causing obstruction to passers by /traffic etc, I hope this clarifies my position
regards
Dec
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Dec
No problems like you I just cringe when I see these things being used wrongly. Fortunately I never walk past lives mean to much.
Thanks for being a gentleman.
Alex
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Neil Chowney wrote:I would add that I would be very surprised if any manufacturer gave dispensation not to extend all outriggers. The operators manual would certainly be referred to in case of problems.
Additionally I would also draw attention to the human factors aspect as well. There is no engineered solution that would stop the operator forgetting that he only has the two kerbside outriggers extended, and slewing the jib past the centre point and putting load onto the other side.
Neil,
Sorry, there IS a DEFINITIVE engineering solution which will prevent this exact occurrence and it is EASILY implemented during the design phase of the equipment.
The ONLY reason it may NOT be implemented is COST.
Paul
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Guys,
never lose sight of the common sense factor, when the load is on the bed of the vehicle it's load is spread over the whole vehicle and more so the wheels. When the load is taken up by the hi-ab arm it becomes a point load!
The legs are not primarily a ballance device they are vehicle stability device as well, with the legs out, the load on the frame of the vehicle is directly transfered to the legs and IF they have been set out correctly they provide a weight transfer direct to the legs that firmly support tht load. If however, the legs are not out the load is transfered to the wheels, those soft air inflated systems that move when weight is put on them allowing the loads gravity point to swing about!
The added motion of the softness of the wheels can make the load swing far more then it would when it has solid weight transfer to the outriggers! I suspect we can all see this when we look at a load being lifted and in an effort to put a legal basis to the argument, we sometimes overlook the simple argument that may have more sway (pun intended) with the driver.
I hope this is of help
L
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.