Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
essjc123  
#1 Posted : 18 March 2010 15:05:16(UTC)
Rank: New forum user
essjc123

Dear All

I have been asked to do a basic hazard audit (pre someone doing risk assessments of my department) Basically I have to identify the biggest hazards and catorgorise them in groups such as Physical, equipment, bio, environmental, human factors, etc, etc. ............ Has anyone done anything like this before? Has anyone got examples please????? Any info would be much appreciated. This is for an office/business centre/ training centre/ Youth project environment.
firesafety101  
#2 Posted : 18 March 2010 15:40:00(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
firesafety101

Basic hazard audit? Not sure what you mean? How do you know what the hazards are without risk assessment?

You could start by identifying the tasks - then split the tasks into "bite size chunks" then, risk assess the chunks.

I do know what you mean, of course, but you will not know the highest hazards until after risk assessment.
redken  
#3 Posted : 18 March 2010 16:31:42(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
redken

How can you do a risk assessment if you do not first know/identify the hazards?
chris.packham  
#4 Posted : 18 March 2010 16:35:01(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
chris.packham

Keep in mind that when identifying chemical hazards it is the actual hazard that arises when the chemical is used and not necessarily the hazard that is stated on the safety data sheet. The two are frequently very different. So you will first have to identify the task, then what happens to the chemical(s) in use and the resulting hazard. Only then can you do a valid risk assessment.

Remember also that safety data sheets generally only state those chemicals that have been allocated risk phrases. There are literally thousands of chemicals that do not have risk phrases that, when used, can represent a hazard to health.

Chris
kennedyphiri  
#5 Posted : 18 March 2010 16:49:02(UTC)
Rank: New forum user
kennedyphiri

Hazard identification
The following three questions enable hazard identification; -
1. Is there a source of harm?
2. Who or what could be harmed?
3. How could harm occur?
Classifying work activities
One way of classifying work activities is as follows: -
(a) Geographical areas within and /or outside the organization’s premises.
(b) Stages in a production process or in the provision of a service.
(c) Planned work, e.g. different operational stages of the process.
(d) Reactive work, i.e. work carried out in response to an unplanned event.
(e) Defined tasks, e.g. driving, window cleaning.
(f) Various identified working groups, e.g. employees, contractors.
(g) Plant operation and maintenance works.
(h) Tasks being carried out by contractors.
The following list, not exhaustive, gives examples of the information required for
each work activity. It can form the basis of a pro-forma checklist.
1) Tasks being carried out:
a. duration;
b. frequency
c. external weather conditions – wet, cold, hot
2) Location(s) where the work is carried out.
3) Proximity to and scope of hazardous interaction with other workplaces.
4) Who normally or occasionally carries out the tasks, e.g. operators, maintenance staff
5) Others who may be affected by the work, e.g. maintenance staff, contractors, visitors, neighbouring organizations, the public.
6) Training that personnel have received in relation to their tasks.
7) Written , systems of work and/or permit to work procedures prepared for the tasks.
8) Plant, machinery and equipment that is used, e.g. suitability, ease of use.
9) Maintenance, condition, calibration and test conditions of plant.
10) Training for plant, equipment and tooling operations.
11) Powered hand tools that are used – company owned, private ownership.
12) Manufactures’ or suppliers’ instructions for operation and maintenance of equipment, plant, machinery and powered hand tools.
13) Size, shape, surface characteristic condition, e.g. sharp edges, hot, cold, and weight (including centre of gravity) of materials that will be handled.
14) Physical capabilities of personnel undertaking tasks.
15) Distances and heights that materials have to be moved by hand (including accessibility to loads and environment for transfers).
16) Services used, e.g. electricity, compressed air, gas.
17) Substances used or encountered, e.g. created or given off during a process
18) Physical form of substances used or encountered (fume, gas, vapour, liquid, dust, powder, solid).
19) Content and recommendations of safety data sheets relating to substances used or encountered (or formed during process).
20) Requirements of relevant legislation and standards relevant to the tasks, the plant and machinery used and the substances used or generated during the tasks.
21) Control measures believed to be in place at the time.
22) Reactive monitoring data: incident, accident and ill health experience associated with the tasks and equipment and substances used, gained as a result of information, benchmarks and outside organisations.
23) Findings of any existing assessments relating to the work activity.
24) Other available information, benchmarks, regulatory guidance and professional bodies.
Broad categories of harm
To help with the process of identifying hazards it is useful to categorise hazards in different ways, for example by topic: -
mechanica and/or physical (machinery, plant and equipment);
electrical (shock ,fire);
chemical;
biological;
radiation (ionising and non-ionising);
fire and explosion;
thermal (hot, cold, humidity, internal and/or external)
psychological (stress, work pressures) and
organisational.
stephendclarke  
#6 Posted : 18 March 2010 19:29:30(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
stephendclarke

Hi,
I would try the following websites - the Leeds City Council online risk assessment training site is a very good intoduction:
http://www.leeds.gov.uk/risk/index.aspx

http://www.web-safety.com/hazards/

http://www.ioshroutefinder.co.uk/

Cheers
Steve
David H  
#7 Posted : 18 March 2010 19:59:17(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
David H

Ok - lets keep this simple.

Start with a brain storming session.
What are the tasks?
What are the hazards associated with the task?
Now group the hazards into Physical, equipment, bio, environmental, human factors - remember HF will include stress!
Then prioritise - most hazardous first and implement controls.

Risk assessment demands you record the significant findings only, but by recording all the tasks you are responsible for allows better management of not only risk, but health surveilance, DSE assessments, maintenace, refresher training etc


If you want further help PM me.

David H
Adrian Watson  
#8 Posted : 19 March 2010 07:40:33(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Adrian Watson

I agree with David, keep it short and simple; but no simpler than it needs to be!

1. Identify all tasks and characterise them in terms of activity, person & environment;
2. Identify events that will cause harm;
3. Evaluate the possibility of harm and the likelihood of the injury in fact occurring;
4. Identify all measures that will prevent the event, control the likelihood of harm or protect against the worst effect;
5. Carry out a gap analysis to identify measures that are not being undertaken;
6. Implement all required measures;
7. Evaluate the measures to ensure that the work;
8. If the work, hurrah!, if they don't go back to 3.

Regards Adrian

PS Record the process; if you have no records how can you prove that you are doing something.

In considering severity I suggest:

Serious,
Significant;
Minor;
Trivial.

In considering likelihood I suggest:

Certain;
Probable;
Possible;
Negligible.

To consider harm I suggest you consider the effects of Physical (energies & forces), Biological, & Chemical agents. Remember to keep it real and not hypothetical or fanciful. If in doubt get help!

Kate  
#9 Posted : 19 March 2010 09:23:49(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Kate

The task is not to do a risk assessment, just to identify the hazards prior to a risk assessment being done. So don't make it complicated, just walk around looking at the workplace and thinking about what happens in it and talking to the people who work there and think "what could happen that could harm someone?"

For an example, see the first two columns (what are the hazards / who could be harmed and how) of the HSE's simple risk assessment examples at http://www.hse.gov.uk/risk/casestudies/index.htm

I think it's easiest to write all the hazards down as you think of them and then categorise them afterwards.
pete48  
#10 Posted : 19 March 2010 11:17:01(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
pete48

I agree with Kate. This is just a part of the process designed to get you thinking about the hazards in your work area. Hazards remain, it is the risk that is controlled.
I have used it myself many times. Forget all about risk assessment and the five steps for now. The risk assessor (or whoever) will simply use your local knowledge to build a platform for the risk assessments.
Follow Kates advice. Simple list of hazards, don't get confused or too focused by situations that are at higher risk than need be due to lack of control. Mains electricity is a hazard, a broken socket housing or bare wire is a hazard because it is electricity. The defect may need prompt repair but it is not what I would put on your list. It is an example of failed risk controls that has given rise to an unacceptable/unnecessary risk. Needs to be sorted not put on a hazard list.
Once you have them listed then categorise them as given.
It is a tried and tested way to make sure that priority is established based on the presence of hazards and that these have been properly assessed before going onto linking hazards to individual tasks.
chris.packham  
#11 Posted : 19 March 2010 11:43:39(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
chris.packham

Pete

In principle I am in agreement with both you and Kate. It is the hazard that is at question here. However, I cannot agree that you should not link hazard to individual tasks. With some hazards this may be perfectly acceptable. However, with chemicals the hazard can be directly related to what happens during the task. We purchase chemicals to use them. In the process changes occur. The ultimate hazard that arises when the chemical is used in a task may be very different than that of the original chemical (or chemicals, if mixed, etc.).

As an example I can cite a situation where a sensitiser in an epoxy impregnated mat had been blamed for occupational dermatitis when the investigation showed that this was not bio-available and therefore not the cause of the skin condition. In other words, in this situation the impregnant was not a significant skin hazard. However, with another task in the same workplace the use of a solvent with the same mat in the process was rendering the sensitiser bioavailable and thus a significant hazard.

In fact, in assisting clients in risk assessement for skin exposure to chemicals identifying the real hazard is often the most difficult part of the task.

Chris
jwk  
#12 Posted : 19 March 2010 12:53:36(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
jwk

What you've been asked to do is a bsic risk register, which is something everybody should be doing. Agree with the advice on how to find hazards, another angle is to use the HSG65 model; consider inputs, processes, outputs and waste.

Inputs:

people
raw materials
services from others
utilities
documents
equipment

Processes:

whatever it is you do such as:
hot work
construction
excavation
assembly
reactions
refining

Outputs:

finished goods
services

Waste:

emmissions to:

air
ground
water

John
pete48  
#13 Posted : 19 March 2010 13:54:16(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
pete48

Chris, absolutely agree with you overall. Just have a slighly different approach to rationalising the process I think.
If you do not have any chemicals then you cannot have any tasks that might expose people to the hazard and there is no risk to control. I realise that in terms of chemicals and substances it is unlikey that a business has no such materials but I use your specialist area to illustrate my view.
So start with what you have that can cause harm, then think about how and where that harm can occur in your business? First bit is hazard i.d. second bit is risk assessment and task based assessment is always fundamental in that element.
I was taught this approach in engineering study many years ago and it has stood me in good stead e ever since. In the years after risk assessment became the holy grail of evrtday H&S managment and the confusions that still exist from that, I constantly found task based risk assessment as the only assessments completed and many of them had either assumed that "it isnt a hazard" when they meant the risks were properly or adequately controlled. A similar situation to many that I am sure you find when focusing on chemicals/substances.
Pete
Steve Sedgwick  
#14 Posted : 19 March 2010 15:07:43(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Steve Sedgwick

essjc123 wrote:
Dear All

I have been asked to do a basic hazard audit (pre someone doing risk assessments of my department) Basically I have to identify the biggest hazards and catorgorise them in groups such as Physical, equipment, bio, environmental, human factors, etc, etc. ............ Has anyone done anything like this before? Has anyone got examples please????? Any info would be much appreciated. This is for an office/business centre/ training centre/ Youth project environment.


essjc
you have been tasked with developing a "Risk Assessment Needs Analysis".

The results of your work should guide the management team towards prioritising the risk assessment effort towards the high risks first.

This is the sensible approach which prevents the trival risks being assessed before the more serious issues.

I have sent you a template but advise that you just concentrate on part 1 that lists many of the hazards and categorises them. ie Some practical help for you.
Amend this to suit your business.

Steve
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.