Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
StevenHope  
#1 Posted : 11 May 2010 13:35:25(UTC)
Rank: New forum user
StevenHope

I have been involved with an issue at work where an employee has just returned to work after 4 months absence due to depression. we have eased him into work after assessing his conditiion with interviews and private medical examinaton.
I am, however in disagreement with his Manager and the Company HR Manager who are intent on initiating disciplinary action against him because he failled to adhere to the policy in place regarding keeping in touch when he was absent (2 weeks over 4 mnths). He went through a particularly rough period during his absence and has said that he was concentrating on "survival" and he was not in a mental condition to talk to work.
I believe that, considering the circumstances that initiating disiplinary action would be wholely inappropriate and would only serve to further distress the chap.
Any help and advice with this would be very much ppreciated.

Thanks,

Steven Hope
garry saunders  
#2 Posted : 11 May 2010 15:26:09(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
garry saunders

Steven,
My first point is why you are getting involed at this level. If it is only professional you might want to think about the implications of this. If it is more you run the risk of being seen as partisan.

This is a difficult issue as there are many variables.

Anyway, on the issue you raise I have to say that the response depends very much on the culture of the employer. In a good situation the employee would be able to explian their siutation with a reasonable expectation that the manager would be understanding. This raises a question concerning what this person's absence record has been over the laast year or two. Also it depends on their general performance to be honest, it sounds like there are other issues going on here.

Is there a trade union, if so use it. Is ther a sickness and absence policy, check to see what is says. Check the CIPD website and ACAS for standards around manageing absence. If the person was really as bad as you say it seems odd that they are OK to return after two weeks. Again what is the rest of the story?

Another point is to get a doctor on board if you can.

wizzpete  
#3 Posted : 12 May 2010 09:40:46(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
wizzpete

I would agree with Garry here - there may be much more to the situation than meets the eye. A Union (if there is one, recognised or not) can offer excellent advice and my have experience in this area.

A professional opinion (e.g. the employee's Doctor) should be sought, preferably before any disciplinary action is taken, less the stress of any hearing prompts the employee to claim constructive dismissal or harrassment. This however, would require the employees' consent, which they may well query. The interviews and medical you say that has been done are post-event and so may not point to the state of his health during his absence.



Ron Hunter  
#4 Posted : 13 May 2010 23:08:44(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Ron Hunter

Some might consider a disciplinary warning a mild approach. He could have been dismissed in absentia for not reporting in as required. From a H&S professional's perspective though, this is one to back rapidly away from.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.