Rank: New forum user
|
As an Aerospace depth maintenance organisation we often send working parties overseas & to mainland Europe. One such working party is currently in Belgium & has a requirement to carry out a process involving Liquid Nitrogen, unfortunately we have been unable thus far to source a supplier in their local so it appears our only option is to transport a small quantity in a 3Ltr flask with a screw & clip top via Euro tunnel by car.
Question ~ other than ensuring the flask is secured upright & has the relevant MSDS, COSHH Ass & Risk Ass for its use, what other (if any) documentation needs to be carried, what warning signs need to be displayed on the vehicle & are there any EU Laws / Regs that would prevent us from doing this?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
I strongly recommend that you refer to BCGA CODE OF PRACTICE CP30 "The Safe Use of Liquid Nitrogen Dewars up to 50 Litres Revision 1 : 2008" It is comprehansive and includes a section on transportation of dewars.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
The working party would be dead by asphyxiation beforew they left blighty.
3 litres liquid Nitrogen will result in 2049 litres of gaseous nitrogen.
Under the Carriage Regulations, liquid nitrogen must only be transported in vessels which are suitable for this purpose. Ordinary vacuum flasks (‘thermos’ flasks) are not
suitable.
3 litres of liquid nitrogen will become 2049 litres of gaseous nitrogen.
Also as liquid nitrogen is cold, it will condense any moisture in the atmosphere, with the possibility of forming a water-ice plug which may seal the dewar vent, causing the pressure to build up. This can result in an explosion hazard.
NITROGEN, REFRIGERATED LIQUID
Product UN number, ie UN 1977
Product danger sign, ie a green diamond with a cylinder symbol and the
number 2 at the bottom
Dewars must be transported separately from the driver or passengers. Flat-back vehicles, vehicles with a separating bulkhead that gas cannot leak through or trailers should be considered.
Dewars shall not be transported in cars.
The driver shall carry a document with the following information:
product UN number, ie UN 1977
product designation, ie NITROGEN, REFRIGERATED LIQUID
product classification code, ie Class 2.2
the volume of each dewar and the number of dewars
the consignor’s name and address
the address of the consignee (if known)
In the case of transporting 3 litres no driver vocational qualification is required
Refer to BCGA CP 30 Rev 1
And DO NOT TRANSPORT BY CAR
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
bleve wrote:
In the case of transporting 3 litres no driver vocational qualification is required
ADR 2009, 8.2.3 Awareness training is nowever required.
ADR 2009 8.1.4.2 2kg fire extinguisher is also required (Of type a.b.c. dry powder)
I suggest you consult with a qualified Dangerous Goods Safety Advisor for further details. Feel free to IM me your phone number if you want any further details.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
But as stated no vocational training is required
2kg DP FX is of no actual benefit for the goods in question or even in the event of vehicle fire.
Thirdly I am a qualified DGSA
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: New forum user
|
Many thanks for the replies
bleve, once we have satified CP30 & the ADR, what would you suggest is the content of the brief given to the driver (a qulified aircraft engineer) bearing in mind our obligation to provide adequate IITS?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Interestingly, provided that the receptical is double walled, vacuum insulated surrounded by absorbent insulating material protected by an iron basket and placed within a metal case with carrying handles then the provisions of ADR do not apply. (Special provision 593)
Most importantly the container must not be in the same compartment as the driver and passengers (Would suggest a cage chaines or secured to the back of a pick up/open truck.
Main content of the brief:
What to do in the case of spillage
What do do in the case of contact with liquid nitrogen
How to recognise signs of ice plugging and emergency action. i.e evacuate area, contact the emergency services (they may have to sand bag the container).
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Can you let me know when it is being transported so i can avoid the Euro Tunnel on that day. Sounds blooming scary to me :-)
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Lets put this in perspective - 3 litres of liquid nitrogen evaporated into a car would kill the occupants, so it is essential that the boil off does not happen within the vehicle and that there is no possibility that it spills into the vehicle.
However, evaporated into a larger volume of air, the risk rapidly diminishes. In my office, which is approximately 18 cubic metres, it would only reduce the oxygen concentration to around 18%. This would not be a danger to my life, unless it spilt all at once and I was actually in close proximity to the boiling liquid.
Vacuum flasks which are specifically designed for liquid nitrogen and have vented lids, so if this is the vessel referred to then it is safe for the purpose of carrying liquid nitrogen. The domestic vacuum flask is not suitable, because the lid will screw down and then the contents will explode - but this will happen long before you reach the tunnel.
I have come across the ice plug problem, but mostly with really old equipment that had very narrow necks.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
As an aircraft engineer myself I find it hard to believe that there is no liquid nitrogen available near to the work location. The aviation industry is not the only organisation that uses interferance fit engineering. Have you tried BOC, to see if they have interests or a sister company's over there. Maybe your guys on the ground are not looking hard enough?
I mean no offense but as an engineer with specific training on the safe use, storage and handling of LN2 and LOX, I dont think that this is the site to get sound advise that would stand up in court if it all went wrong. Hense my own slope shoulder reply.
However, putting that aside, if you came into my office with this issue my first question would be: what do the train and tunnel operators say? LN2 has a 1 to 696 expansion rate (not good in a car, train or tunnel), so I can see them being a bit miffed if you dont speak to them.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
There are no problems in getting deliveries of LN2 in Belgium or elsewhere in Europe though as always the issue is of scale - few suppliers will be interested in such small volumes but will probably direct you to one of their clients from where you can purge your vessel and collect the small volume that you require.
As for Eurotunnel - the calculations are perhaps sufficient to impress some of the readers here but for God's sake don't turn up at the Tunnel and tell them its OK, someone here who hasn't even given their name says its fine! It's their tunnel, and their rules. Ask first and prepare for a refusal.
Absorbent material is a fun idea - heaven alone knows what an outer layer of absorbent material would absorb! Spilled LN2 would percollate right through it quickly, and still boil off rapidly. The need for absorbent material is surely to soak up only the frozen liquids that you may be transporting - not the LN2.
And for the requirement to keep the dewar out of the passenger compartment and instead in the boot, this is a little more nonsense on which I would not rely. Unless of course your boot is airtight from the passenger compartment but separately and freely vested to the outside.
For road travel in cars in the UK only, the general advice is to use the boot (to avoid burns from direct contact), but to keep at least 2 windows at least 1/2 open in the passenger compartment to ensure sufficient ventilation. And if you feel your feet getting cold, get out quickly!
Do take care, with the LH2 that you use and the advice that you rely upon.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Ian.Blenkharn wrote:There are no problems in getting deliveries of LN2 in Belgium or elsewhere in Europe though as always the issue is of scale - few suppliers will be interested in such small volumes but will probably direct you to one of their clients from where you can purge your vessel and collect the small volume that you require.
As for Eurotunnel - the calculations are perhaps sufficient to impress some of the readers here but for God's sake don't turn up at the Tunnel and tell them its OK, someone here who hasn't even given their name says its fine! It's their tunnel, and their rules. Ask first and prepare for a refusal.
Absorbent material is a fun idea - heaven alone knows what an outer layer of absorbent material would absorb! Spilled LN2 would percollate right through it quickly, and still boil off rapidly. The need for absorbent material is surely to soak up only the frozen liquids that you may be transporting - not the LN2.
And for the requirement to keep the dewar out of the passenger compartment and instead in the boot, this is a little more nonsense on which I would not rely. Unless of course your boot is airtight from the passenger compartment but separately and freely vested to the outside.
For road travel in cars in the UK only, the general advice is to use the boot (to avoid burns from direct contact), but to keep at least 2 windows at least 1/2 open in the passenger compartment to ensure sufficient ventilation. And if you feel your feet getting cold, get out quickly!
Do take care, with the LH2 that you use and the advice that you rely upon.
I think you have spent too long looking through microscopes, maybe you should re read what was stated by the people posting.
Not a single person has made reference to storage in the boot of a car other than you. As for specification of container including absorbent material, without compliance to this and container requirement, ADR will be then applicable and then transportation by car would be prohibited.
Where ADR is not applicable and RID is complied with then tunnel operators or otherwise have no grounds to refuse.
Oh and by the way for road travel in the UK the accepted advise (BCGA) is to use pick up truck or open body vehicle and not as you suggest a car.
Once again, I suggest that you read the postings and consider fully before responding.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Do I see bleve describing a bleve above?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
I think LH2 crept in as a typo! That would be a different matter altogether.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Jane
I think Ian was just showing off his cyrillic capability.
P
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
bleve wrote:
Where ADR is not applicable and RID is complied with then tunnel operators or otherwise have no grounds to refuse.
Oh and by the way for road travel in the UK the accepted advise (BCGA) is to use pick up truck or open body vehicle and not as you suggest a car.
Travel by car is repeatedly referenced, and where is the goods compartment....the boot, unless you propose the glove compartment or a roof rack!
And how ridiculous to say that Eurotunnel have no grounds to refuse .... it's their tunnel and they can set whatever rules they want, as can the various regulatory bodies to whom they are responsible. I would think a fair bet that they would refuse; trying to bully them into agreement with your own opinion is pointless and entirely inappropriate
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.