Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Graham Bullough  
#1 Posted : 07 July 2010 18:28:24(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Graham Bullough

Some of you may have seen websites or received e-mails containing similarly couched advice about “extremely dangerous” office paper shredding machines. Such advice is accompanied by a gruesome photo of a hand with serious lacerations to the fingers and thumb allegedly suffered at such a machine while clearing a paper jam. Some people have forwarded the advice to others in good faith. However, along with some other recipients, I am sceptical about the advice and photo for several reasons: These include the lack of any information about where and when the injury occurred, at what sort and size of machine and whether any enforcement body was involved and with what result. Though the advice suggests that a standard office type shredder was involved, such machines are usually designed with narrow inlet and outlet apertures which physically prevent access by fingers to the danger area. Furthermore, while the lacerations seem real, their orientation and extent are not consistent with having been caused at a standard office shredding machine i.e. with cutters comprising serrated vertical disks mounted on two horizontal power-driven spindles. If you have seen the advice and photo, do you share my scepticism? More importantly, can anyone provide more information about the advice and photo and where they originated?
Mick Noonan  
#2 Posted : 08 July 2010 09:14:01(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Mick Noonan

I can't answer your question directly, however, I have also come across many photos like the one you've described. I think yours is probably a "fake". They are popular as some safety people think scaring the pants off their employees is the way to go. Not my cup of tea, of course. If it looks wrong then it probably is...
m  
#3 Posted : 08 July 2010 12:36:37(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
m

The first port of call must be to www.snopes.com who are dedicated to proving or disproving such 'information'. Cut and paste a sample of the text into their search engine. I searched on 'shredder' and found that children and dogs are at risk. If you are faint hearted or a dog lover don't follow this link: http://www.snopes.com/cr...rs/crusader/shredder.asp
stuie  
#4 Posted : 08 July 2010 19:54:03(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
stuie

Hallival; I too have seen the image that I think you are referring to. I put it down as a fake; the main reason for my thinking was also that the 'cuts' go across the fingers meaning someone would have had to put their hand in sideways (assuming shredder works in same way in all that I have experienced?); also as others have said the opening would have had to pretty large to get a hand into. However it did wake up a couple of the others in the when I shared the image with them!!
stevie40  
#5 Posted : 08 July 2010 20:04:24(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
stevie40

It is relatively easy on these things to flip over the shreding head, depress the interlock trip switch and then access the underside of the revolving shredder blades. I might have done that on my home machine to clear a blockage - then again, I might not. Do as I say, not as I do :-)
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.