Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Jackson900572  
#1 Posted : 12 July 2010 15:26:51(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Jackson900572

The management have come to my way of thinking (so thank you all) they are now worried about the response from other members of staff because they may want new comfy 'ergonomic' chairs. My play on this is to wait for people's awareness to subside from the 'new chair' in the department and see what comments come back from the annual DSE assessments which are due in October. Previous assessments have not brought up issues, this assessment has been accompanied by a Workstation Setup Guide, which has been individually assessed with my assistance for certain individuals, therefore not requiring new equipment. How else have other people managed to providing new equipment to an individual and not then get further requested from others? Many thanks again
KieranD  
#2 Posted : 12 July 2010 15:36:36(UTC)
Rank: Guest
Guest

My way of addressing your question, 'How else have other people managed to providing new equipment to an individual and not then get further requested from others?' is to explain to people at all levels the differences between these three classes of risks and offer coaching to address the issues arising. 1. 'Pure' risks are those concerned with avoiding costs of losses, damage, injiury, illness and death; this is commonly what safety and health (and Facilities) practitionres are most concened about and specifically concerns the direct costs associated with PPE, safe furniture, handtools and equipment 2. 'Speculative' risks are those involved in any business: they conceren the net gains afer paying the costs. They are commonly thought of as 'reducing the bottom line' although successful leaders are even more concerned about 'increasing the top line', i.e. boosting levels of revenue through innovatio and customer service. 3. 'Behavioural risks' are those that arise every day from what people at all levels do or avoid. The scope includes reducing errors, near-misses, accidents and so on, on the one hand, and increasing the quality of concentration, co-operatiion, helpfulness, product adaptation and service improvement. This is the class of risks that is most commonly neglected and most waste occurs while people talk about the other classes of risk. So, this is the area of opportunity for most safety and health practtiioners to contribute to improving the top line of their organsiation, especially through coaching about improved human relationships at all levels
Steve e ashton  
#3 Posted : 12 July 2010 15:48:12(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Steve e ashton

If anyone gets envious oif the 'new chair' = ask them which they would rather have - a brand new chair and the envy of their workmates - or a life without pain, discomfort, lack of sleep, difficulty in movement etc. If they are in any doubt at all about the answer - tell them to speak with the person who needs the new chair and ask them which they would prefer? Or, to put it bluntly - If you take my disabled parking space you take my disability as well!!! Steve
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.