Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
m  
#1 Posted : 09 August 2010 14:29:03(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
m

We have a range of machines where various slow moving part are protected by interlock switches. We are implementing a regime to record the checks rather that the ad-hoc (it worked when we last went inside) scenario that exists at present. What frequency would be appropriate to carry out this checklist. I don't want it so frequent that it does not get done because it takes too much time but I don't want it so infrequent that something could go wrong. It's all new kit with no history of failure
GeoffB4  
#2 Posted : 09 August 2010 17:57:34(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
GeoffB4

How often do the manufacturers recommend they are checked?
johnld  
#3 Posted : 09 August 2010 19:04:29(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
johnld

Its many years since I was involved in manufacturing. But at that time all interlocks were checked at the start of each shift and when any tool change had taken place. This very much reflected what was required by the Power Press Regulations in force at that time and which we also applied to injection moulding machines, guillotines and similar equipment which employed interlocked guards.
antbruce001  
#4 Posted : 09 August 2010 21:33:26(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
antbruce001

Hi, There are no legally defined frequency for testing for interlocks. It should be risk based, considering the likelihood of failure and the consequences. Just like most things to do with H&S. The joys of goal setting law! Tony.
m  
#5 Posted : 10 August 2010 07:54:41(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
m

Thanks for your replies. I have already sent the engineers running towards the supplier information - suppliers of the machines and the switches. You have confirmed my thoughts that there is no defined frequency, that would have to depend on the degree of hazard within, the need to access it and the amount of use that it gets. The phone support at the British Safety Council have come up with similar views. I feel a risk assessment coming on....
paul.skyrme  
#6 Posted : 10 August 2010 21:22:48(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
paul.skyrme

IF the machine is CE marked, and is controlled by a "plc/cnc/computer" then the interlocks must be checked as operational by the control system at every usage. Also the build standards required to comply with CE should ensure that this occurs. The harmonised standards require FMEA, & MTBF etc. analysis of the systems. All SRPCS must comply with relevant legislation now, and there is not really that much change in the new directive/standards.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.