Rank: Forum user
|
Hi
Like most H&S people, I guess, I write lots of advice and guidance stuff. Amendments to policy documents and information on what to do in an emergency etc.
But do people read this stuff?
I get them to return an acknowledgment form to say they’ve read it, and I go through some highlights at staff meetings regularly.
I had this wheeze about putting a deliberate mistake in and giving a prize (£10 voucher) for anyone who spotted it. It’s not a typo, but something like a miss-spelling, or saying I sit on the first desk on the right, when I actually sit on the first desk on the left, and there it’s the only desk in that area anyway. (Obviously nothing significant!)
I’ve had some people return their acknowledgments with lots of corrections, mostly grammatical niceties and typos. No one’s spotted my deliberate one yet (maybe too subtle). Obviously showing some people have really read it carefully.
So now, have I opened myself up to another can of worms? Could it be argued that people who do not write anything in the ‘What’s the deliberate mistake’ box have not read it???
I’d have a very robust response to that suggestion of course The ‘Lead a horse to water’ aphorism comes to mind.
Does anyone else have ideas to encourage people to read their stuff?
Graham
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Graham,
Once you have a signed acknowledgement that they have read and understood the document, reverted to you with any questions they have to assist in their understanding of the contents, you have done all that is expected of you.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Agree with Ciaran, but it is an age old problem about how do you get people to read what is put out for their benefit.
Also how do you know that a person can read?
I have worked with people who could not read in the rail and marine industries without initially realising that they could not read.
I know of ports in the UK who print their instructions to hauliers about driving within the port in several languages but this still does not cover everybody.
Take Care
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Its all very good and well issuing a document, and getting a signature as proof that they have read and understood it, however this means nothing at all if the workforce is not putting this into action and actually following the guidance.
Worse still, if it is accepted practice not to follow guidance, then these signatures aren't worth the paper they're written on. I'm not saying we shouldn't do it, just that this is the starting point.
I know it's the golden rainbow, but you need to strive towards managers & supervisors (and ultimately the workforce self-regulating themselves) enforcing this guidance and referring to it frequently.
"Why are you doing that, have you not read the policy on the noticeboard....."
Difficult I know, but this is the next step and challenge really for safety practitioners. I think it all goes back to the employee involvement approach. If staff have ownership and input into safety policies & procedures they are more likely to follow them - and more importantly flag up colleagues who are breaking the rules. It's not good enough anymore to just bring in rules without consultation.
Regards,
Ian
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Fletcher,
Where I deliver induction training, I conduct a written test to prove that they understand the training. I always have a chat with the foreperson to see if there are any issues regarding to literacy with any member of the team.
I have taken the lads aside later and gone through the documentation with them, asked them the questions, filled in the answers they have given me and they signed their sheet with their mark.
It is imperative that everyone is treated with equal respect and their colleagues do appreciate the efforts made to accomodate them with dignity.
I have also seen strikes kick off as a result of one safety officers insensitivity in dealing with a similar scenario. How the person got off the site alive beats me. He reduced a grown man to tears with his smart remarks.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
I think we can all relate to Graham's situation. Policies and such corporate stuff is a real bugbear of mine. A little while ago I started a thread about the whole 'policy as control' issue. For me, they aren't controls in themselves, they begat controls through local procedures.
Problem is that whilst we've all got bits of paper that pretty much says that the relevant people have read and understood stuff, nobody seems to have the time to go out there and see if that's the situation on the ground.
As has been said, I don't think there's more you can do on the 'read and understand' front, Graham. Your efforts are best put into audits if you get the chance. And we all know how welcome those are.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
|
Graham
In response to your question: Does anyone else have ideas to encourage people to read their stuff?
1. Use images rather than words to communicate, especially on noticeboards and in magazines, where the readership is large and diverse. The scope for effective uses of images to communicate about safety and health and work is enormous and seldom very well managed.
2. Choose a monthly theme for your messages, so that you have a calendar cycle of 12 key messages, and keep to that arrangement for at least 36 months.
3. Co-operate with whoever in your firm is responsible for marketing and publcity, both to share sources of images and to enable him/her to use your safety images as the images of preference in any communications with customers, government and the public.
4. Submit an article to at least two professonal magazines at least once a year (each), with photographs illustrating how well you communicate to control high standards of safety and health at work
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.