Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
safetyman2010  
#1 Posted : 17 August 2010 11:57:01(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
safetyman2010

Hi,

This is prob a silly question but would a extraction unit fitted above an LPG gas oven in commerical kitchen be regarded as a LEV and subject to 14 monthly statutory inspections?

Cheers
User is suspended until 03/02/2041 16:40:57(UTC) Ian.Blenkharn  
#2 Posted : 17 August 2010 12:51:55(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Ian.Blenkharn

Regular checks to support a periodic cleaning regimen are prudent as there systems get coated with dust and debris and saturated with oil and fat residues. There have been many fires associated with poor maintenance.
Steve e ashton  
#3 Posted : 17 August 2010 13:03:03(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Steve e ashton

safetyman: YES! The hood is there to remove carbon dioxide - your COSHH assessment should identify the by-products of gas combustion as a hazardous substance, and the cooker hood as one the controls... So it is LEV, and it shoudl be inspected every fourteen months... But depending on useage (a lot of frying is worse than a bit of baking), you may find that more frequent inspection (and cleaning) is necessary to minimise blockage (due to grease build up in the filters) leading intially to increased condensation (water vapour is the other main by product of gas combustion) , increased co2 levels - and potential fire, as Ian says...

Steve
Dazzling Puddock  
#4 Posted : 17 August 2010 15:03:12(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Dazzling Puddock

Interesting question!

I have never seen general mechanical extraction counted as LEV in a kitchen environment.

Extraction hoods are used to provide general ventilation of smells/ heat and the tiny amounts of the by products of combustion.

I have seen then tested for efficiency after installation but know of no commercial kitchen that tests them on a 14 month basis.

Cleaning and having filters changed on a regular basis is important but as Gas appliances deemed to emit high levels of CO2 are flued rather than relying on overhead extraction I would not expect Gas ovens to have overhead mechanical extraction subject to statutory inspection.
jay  
#5 Posted : 17 August 2010 15:18:20(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
jay

Refer to HSE information sheet on "Ventilation of kitchens in catering establishments" at;-

http://www.hse.gov.uk/pubns/cais10.pdf
Juan Carlos Arias  
#6 Posted : 17 August 2010 17:16:58(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Juan Carlos Arias

I don't think it is classed as LEV, however, adequate maintenance should be in place.
IanS  
#7 Posted : 17 August 2010 20:33:53(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
IanS

Interesting that the hse doc quoted above doesn't mention CoSHH just general ventilation to reduce smells and heat.

IMHO not LEV and no 14month inspection.
Twinklemel  
#8 Posted : 18 August 2010 09:14:07(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Twinklemel

Speaking as an LA enforcement officer, we do not treat ventilation canopies above kitchen appliances as LEV and therefore do no seek documentary proof of statutory testing. We do, however, check cleaning regimes and view the systems as a possible fire hazard, therefore also advise duty holders to have the ducting professionally cleaned to avoid oil build-up and efficient operation.
A Kurdziel  
#9 Posted : 18 August 2010 10:40:15(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
A Kurdziel

Depends why it is there. If it is there solely to get rid nuisances such as bad smells, steam etc then it is not LEV. If it is there to get rid of anything that might be described as a substance hazardous to health, then it needs it needs check AT LEAST every 14 months.
Even if it not LEV it is work equipment ( not just lathes and things) and needs to be properly maintained and of course the build up of fats and grease makes it a fire hazard, so maintainence should be included in the fire risk assessment.
Users browsing this topic
Guest (2)
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.