Rank: Super forum user
|
Afternoon, I put a question up about skydiving and got a couple of responses, for which thanks very much. Our events people also would like us to relax our prohibition on abseiling and bungee jumping. Now, assuming we do this properly with due diligence on the providers and so on, does anybody have any views about the relative risks, compared to other common fundraising activities such as bikerides, marathon running and so on, of these two activities. Once again any offers of actual numbers would be gratefully recieved, oterwise just opinions,
John
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Opinion only - but I'd say as long as your provider is competent, abseiling is safer than biking and road running, as you're totally in control of the environment: your contractor will control the surface, the ropes, the competence of the staff etc etc...
Bikerides etc take place on roads where you have no control over the actions of other road users!
The same general thoughts would apply to bungee jumping, but I have a prejudice against them because of reports years ago about them causing eyesight damage. I have no figures to support or refute my prejudice!
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
I use to skydive; caving; vertical (head first) abseiling; white water rafting etc…………………
I’ve never had a serious injury until I got on the back of a horse!
Use competent and experienced professionals, look for accredited bodies and get the providers checked out thoroughly.
ENJOY THE FUN!
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
It seems a bit harsh prohibiting these kind of activities! I work for a large corporate that is forever organising this kind of stuff- they even did fire walking last year!
I agree with everyone else on the making sure you use a competent contractor but I would also add that you make sure people are not coerced into doing the activity. I always try and factor in the fun/team building benefits that people get from these kind of activities as part of any risk assessment.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Thanks for the responses so far. To add a bit of context about our in-house prohibition, we are a Charity which provides care for, among others, people with acquired brain injury. The reason for the prohibition is that these activities, if they go wrong, are a good way for people to acquire a brain injury, hence the reason for the ban. However, I and the events team think there has not been an adequate risk assessment, as we do condone and even promote activities which are arguably even more hazardous. So any more opinions welcome, and again, if anybody can point me in the direction of useful numbers; I have tried googling but didn't come up with anything substantial,
John
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.