Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Paice20023  
#1 Posted : 01 September 2010 10:26:05(UTC)
Rank: New forum user
Paice20023

I have been asked to consider acting as health and safety adviser / consultant for a small family builder business doing small builder & refurbishment work, mainly for social housing organisations.

Max contract value would be £40k

1. would I need PII?
2. where would I get this - any known / used by you?

Thanks
firesafety101  
#2 Posted : 01 September 2010 10:58:18(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
firesafety101

I did see recently someone said you don't need PII as long as you stay within your competency but there is always the What if?

We always demand contractors prove they are insured so why don't we?

I use an insurer based in Southport and they are very reasonable, they exclude areas I am not competent in so I do stay away from them, i.e. asbestos.

pm me if you want to know who they are.



stevie40  
#3 Posted : 01 September 2010 11:08:00(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
stevie40

IOSH members have access to a special scheme via Oval Insurance Brokers.
The link is - http://www.theovalgroup....ssociations-schemes/iosh

I have to declare an interest here. I work for the insurer, HCC, who Oval place the business with. I do not work on the professional indemnity side though.

Other insurance brokers can of course arrange this type of cover. Look up BIBA for details of competent brokers in your area. Avoid the likes of Swinton and Endsleigh who deal with volume markets such as private motor and household.
PhilBeale  
#4 Posted : 01 September 2010 11:11:10(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
PhilBeale

Yes you would need PII or at least it would be strongly advisable also you would need public liability insurance. I use Hiscox and for both costs me £25 a month by direct debit so no need to worry about renewing each year also spreads the cost over the year rather than a big bill at the start.

Phil
Heather Collins  
#5 Posted : 01 September 2010 11:44:15(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Heather Collins

Why do you need PI Insurance?

First of all if you are self-employed as a sole trader you are personally liable for any losses caused to your client by your negligence. You say the contract value is only £40k but presumably wrong advice could result in damage to a property in excess of that? If you were held liable then you would be personally responsible for paying those costs if you had no insurance.

Secondly it is explicitly stated in Point 16 of the IOSH Code of professional conduct that members should have PI Insurance where appropriate.

I would very strongly recommend both PI and PL Insurance.
freelance safety  
#6 Posted : 01 September 2010 12:18:27(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
freelance safety

Paice20023

Cannot stress strongly enough that you are covered with PI Insurance. Check with your own bank first, some can provide insurance for health and safety professionals. As others have stated; Oval Insurance Brokers, HISCOX etc
firesafety101  
#7 Posted : 01 September 2010 13:41:53(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
firesafety101

PhilBeale wrote:
Yes you would need PII or at least it would be strongly advisable also you would need public liability insurance. I use Hiscox and for both costs me £25 a month by direct debit so no need to worry about renewing each year also spreads the cost over the year rather than a big bill at the start.

Phil


Now we're naming names I use Hiscox as well but more than twice your DD?

I put my cover up to £1m a while ago can you state what yours is, If similar I'll try for a reduction.

Thanks
Paice20023  
#8 Posted : 02 September 2010 10:57:06(UTC)
Rank: New forum user
Paice20023

Thanks to all for contributions and advice which will be taken.
PhilBeale  
#9 Posted : 02 September 2010 13:14:40(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
PhilBeale

ChrisBurns wrote:
PhilBeale wrote:
Yes you would need PII or at least it would be strongly advisable also you would need public liability insurance. I use Hiscox and for both costs me £25 a month by direct debit so no need to worry about renewing each year also spreads the cost over the year rather than a big bill at the start.

Phil


Now we're naming names I use Hiscox as well but more than twice your DD?

I put my cover up to £1m a while ago can you state what yours is, If similar I'll try for a reduction.

Thanks


Hi Chris

I have 1 million on my PI and 5 million on my general (public) liability i think they also base premiums on your stated turnover as i guess there risks increase the more you turnover. i Completed on-line maybe try putting some figures in on-line and see if you get a different price. Also i work in fire risk assessment as opposed to general H&S so this may or may not make a difference.

Phil
firesafety101  
#10 Posted : 02 September 2010 13:42:21(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
firesafety101

Thanks Phil I'll give it a try

Chris
firesafety101  
#11 Posted : 03 September 2010 11:29:18(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
firesafety101

Hi All.

I just finalised my new PI insurance, same company (Hiscox) but new monthly DD £33.21, old DD £65.62. Not quite half price.

I did it first online and got £22.13 but then on the phone where more detail can be given the slightly dearer amount was agreed.

It appears that fire risk assessment creates a more expensive insurance, due to the greater end result of something going wrong. (That's something to bear in mind for those who are considering carrying out fire risk assessment with little or no experience.)

I cover for both fra and H&S.
firesafety101  
#12 Posted : 03 September 2010 11:30:00(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
firesafety101

Phil, thanks for pointing me in the right direction. Have a good weekend.
Blue  
#13 Posted : 03 September 2010 12:52:10(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Blue

A couple of times a year I carry out a risk assessment for two races held by a running club of which I'm a member, usual entries are 400-500 people in each event. Should I take out indemnity for doing this?
firesafety101  
#14 Posted : 03 September 2010 14:11:31(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
firesafety101

That's your decision Blue, depending on what you usually do.

Lots of people involved, how much responsibility for the whole course do the people you will be working for have?

You could possible insure yourself just for the one event each year, shouldn't cost too much?

Blue  
#15 Posted : 03 September 2010 14:51:02(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Blue

They're both road races, we involve the police and employ their services on the day, for difficult road junctions and any necessary road closures etc. My services are voluntary, I don't receive payment. The assessments are written so the race director takes full responsibilty for the event and anything arising from it, with competitors being liable for their own safety and health during the race.
Rob35  
#16 Posted : 03 September 2010 15:09:51(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Rob35

Blue wrote:
They're both road races, we involve the police and employ their services on the day, for difficult road junctions and any necessary road closures etc. My services are voluntary, I don't receive payment. The assessments are written so the race director takes full responsibilty for the event and anything arising from it, with competitors being liable for their own safety and health during the race.


I would check with the clubs insurance (If they have it) as you are 'working' for them you maybe covered that way.

Rob
PhilBeale  
#17 Posted : 04 September 2010 10:46:50(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
PhilBeale

Blue wrote:
with competitors being liable for their own safety and health during the race.



This issue has come up before on H&S forums and from what other have said this has no legal standing you can not sign away your responsibility of for the welfare of the runners. if they injure themselves due to no fault of the organisers then that's fair enough but if they are injured as a direct result of something that you or the club have failed to provide then you are legally responsible. I believe this is true of all sports and other activities the person doing the activity accepts a certain amount of risk but as the organiser you can not bypass your responsibility for the safety of those taking part.

I think whether you receive payment or not has nothing to do with whether you could be held for blame. Who ever writes the assessments in my view is responsible especially if you are seen to be appointed due to competence as opposed to the only person willing to do the job with no competence. I don't think you can pass responsibility to the race director as he is following your instructions and you would have more competence over him when it comes to H&S. Other wise you would be saying that a company could provide a risk assessment or method statement but if an employee dies following it then it's their fault and not the company who provided the assessment.

As I said before i think there is a big difference between offering advice or giving direction to a question asked to actually taking full responsibility for documentation produced and length of time spent on the project as this shows a deeper level of involvement and responsibility.

Phil
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.