Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
decimomal  
#1 Posted : 08 September 2010 11:44:32(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
decimomal

Here is one to test the lttle grey cells......... Given that the ACOP on Safe Use of Lifting Equipment (LOLER 1998) does not define lifting equipment (Paragraph 32 on page 8) and that "In most cases LOLER will not apply to work equipment which does not have as its principal function a use for lifting or lowering of the type associated with traditional lifting equipment etc etc" Do hairdressers and dentists chairs come under LOLER and therefore subject to periodic examination? My colleague and I are not sure of the answer, but a failure of either could be a bit messy!
Safety Smurf  
#2 Posted : 08 September 2010 11:49:50(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Safety Smurf

I'd be inclined to say no, otherwise office chairs would be in the same boat and IMHO that would be just silly. Looking at it from a common sense approach, failure of the ram is extremely unlikely to be sudden and so the risks in the event of failure are miniscule.
decimomal  
#3 Posted : 08 September 2010 12:17:32(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
decimomal

Thank you for the reply Smurf. We had considered the office chair secenario and determined that a failure would indeed be miniscule, but the effect of a sudden failure during a dental procedure would be more serious. We are inclined to agree that it probably does not come under LOLER and that PUWER would cover it adequately. Just wanted other opinions. Ta.
Ron Hunter  
#4 Posted : 08 September 2010 13:20:54(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Ron Hunter

Ron Hunter  
#5 Posted : 08 September 2010 13:21:54(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Ron Hunter

(Do an edit/find for the word "chair" in that pdf)
Canopener  
#6 Posted : 08 September 2010 13:22:27(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Canopener

I am inclined to agree that they would not be covered under LOLER but para 32 is 'interesting' as I would regard the 'interpretation' under reg 2 of LOLER "lifting equipment" means work equipment for lifting or lowering loads and includes its attachments used for anchoring, fixing or supporting it as a definition!
Clairel  
#7 Posted : 08 September 2010 16:20:23(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Clairel

This has been discussed many times on the forum and their primary use is not lifting and so LOLER does not apply.
colinreeves  
#8 Posted : 09 September 2010 13:52:58(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
colinreeves

decimomal wrote:
the effect of a sudden failure during a dental procedure would be more serious.
I shudder to think of it - hate dentist visits at the best of times but with that picture in my mind .......
Users browsing this topic
Guest (2)
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.