Rank: Forum user
|
Morning All,
We all know the regulations as far as client to appoint CDMC etc but what is the situation when someone is appointed as a CDMC by the principal contractor? I.e. Principal Contractor is a luxury developer, the client has appointed the PC to project manage the whole job and only wants to deal with the PC...
I believe it to be unfortunately a fairly common scenario but wanted to get some thoughts on it...
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Luke
Assuming it is a notifiable project, I thought the Client must appoint a CDMC, otherwise there is the possibility of a conflict of interest between the Client and PC. In any case, the whole purpose of the CDMC's role will be negated if there is not some autonomy in the role.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
The CDM Regs require all appointments to advise the Client of his duties under the Regs.
In this instance, the developer PC having been appointed first, should have informed the Client of his legal duty to appoint a CDM-C.
Presumably there is also a designer somewhere in the mix, who has exactly the same duty.
In other words, the Client's appointments would look to have let him down.
Similarly any CDM-C "appointed" by the PC would be duty-bound to approach the Client........etc.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Agree with Ray, the clinet has to appoint the CDM C (even if it is under advisement from the PC).
The client can't ignore the law just becuase they don't want to do it that way.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Thanks All..
This is the thing.. the client has appointed a PC and basically told them to arrange the CDMC etc... The PC has done this and will be invoiced by the CDMC for the works carried out?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Is the design complete then? Who was CDM-C for that?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
How about this:
PC cannot appoint a CDM-C. Therefore the PC has been appointed by the Client to undertake the CDM-C role. The fact that the PC may have to employ additional competent resource to fulfil that is incidental.
The F10, and the delaration thereon, becomes the "reveal" point.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
So Ron, if that is the case. Would the CDMC put his details on the F10 and not the PC as the PC is utlising the services of the CDMC due to his incompetence?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
The F10 is concerned with Client appointments.
Whilst CDM-Cs routinely complete F10s, remember that the declaration & statements therein are made (in the eyes of the law) by the Client.
In this instance, it would appear that the PC and CDM-C are the same appointment.
Whilst I might opine that issues are "incidental", that doesn't mean I think them necessarily correct.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Further, and not knowing the exact detail of discussion and correspondence between the Client and the PC, there is also the argument that, in failing to make an appointment, the legal duties of the CDM-C fall back to the Client.
As I say, the F10 will be the revealing document.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Careful guys we don't know all the facts here... Is the client a domestic client? (Hint: If so - his 'palming off' to a pc of all project related activity is normal... and perfectly legal.
And then there is no requirement for a cdm-C. Perhaps the PC just wants someone to help them discharge their obligations under H&S law and specifically under the CDM Regs? In which case the appointment of a 'CDM-C' by the PC is understandable (if mistaken) - even laudable - and perfectly legal (if unnecessary).
And if the "luxury developer" has a number of standard designs - then perhaps this project doesn't actually require a 'designer' in the conventional sense... Or maybe the designer is based in Germany (Huff house anyone?)
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Steve
I cannot see how the Client can be a domestic client if they are a luxury developer. Surely, this must be a commercial activity? Again, assuming a large project and is therefore notifiable the Client has a duty to appoint the CDMC and not the PC. That is the principle of the CDM Regs as I understand them.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Ray:
I guess it depends how you define 'luxury developer' For me, it seems quite possible (even likely?) that this could be a house builder who is asked to build 'luxury' homes - i.e. not Barratt or Millers...
And on this basis - a client - a footballer perhaps, or a lottery winner could easily be a domestic client...
And please believe me I know what the CDM Regs say about clients making appointments... But I live in the real world and I also know that some clients will NEVER want anything to do with construction activities - and the role of client's agent, whilst not provided for in the 2007 revised Regs, has not actually been prohibited anywhere...
If Donald Trump asked ME to build a new golf course two hotels and three hundred new large houses on the links in Aberdeen - I wouldn't turn it down because I didn't know how to build golf courses hotels or houses, or who was going to design them or if Donald had appointed a CDM-C.
I'd become a 'luxury developer' overnight, and just do it. And try to keep everything as 'right' as possible without bothering or upsetting my (very) rich client with silly little bureaucratic detail.
I know its not what the law says but sometimes I believe that pragmatic self interest is inevitable and even essential. But not necessarily any more dangerous....
Steve
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Ok Clarification needed me thinks!
1. Client - standard wealthy person wanting to convert a luxury apartment for the purpose of profit.
appoints experienced Developer.
2. Devolper, experienced company, builds a few bespoke properties, developments etc a year.
The developer, approaches a CDMC and stipulates that they have a project and need a CDMC. The developer asks for a price, prices gets accepted and the appointment is made.
The CDMC then proceeds to carry out a side wide survey for the basis of a pre-info plan and told that the actual "client" is a person, rarely in the country and has tasked the Devloper with the project.
The CDMC is now in the situation where he has been contracted to the developer but effectivly the developer is not the "client"...
Does that make more sense?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Luke590
Your wealthy person is NOT a domestic client as defined and is thus responsible for the FULL range of client duties whether s/he likes it or not. Having appointed a contractor as PC and CDMC and Designer still makes him responsible for their competency.
Bob
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
In the UK, well known House-builders are frequently both the Client and Principle Contractor so the house-builder wearing his bowler hat rather than his hard hat will appoint the CDM-C.
|
|
|
|
Rank: New forum user
|
My understanding is: Duties on clients - notifiable projects
Appoint competent CDMC
Appoint a competent principal contractor
Ensure the construction dose not start without suitable welfare facilities & construction phase H&S plan
The client can act as CDMC so long as thay are competent to do so.
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.