Rank: Forum user
|
Hey all,
I work for a construction company and wondered what every ones thoughts were on the CSCS / CPCS cards scheme?
I personnel think that the system is very badly designed and had vast amount of problems on a daily basis. I also think that they are trying to replace common sense and competency with this card system which direct the construction industry does not want to be taking!
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Whilst having a competence scheme that is recognised across the whole country is great in theory it seems to me that the reality leaves something to be desired.
The basic operatives H&S test is so desperately straightforward as to be barely worthwhile. The danger being that some people might think that having passed the test and thereafter being issued with a card would tick all of the boxes and give them a licence to do their worst on site. I think the test is far too basic and too simple and/or the pass threshold is too low for the system to be taken seriously at all.
We put all of our site guys/gals through the test because the card is a pre-requisite for entry to most sites but I have very little faith that it serves any real purpose in making construction sites safer places ............ maybe it's just a bit of a money-making scheme rather than a serious tool for improving safety standards.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
In theory this was a good idea when it was drawn-up. However, the initial touch screen test is about as basic a test as you could ask for and does not denote competency in any way IMO.
I found the scheme was not very well constructed when it was rolled-out, but it has improved a little over the years. I did find it incredulous that a Chartered Health & Safety Practitioner with 20 years construction practice and experience would not be deemed competent to obtain a card, which did happen?
Things have changed and the system is being reviewed constantly. I think in general it is a positive but that it has taken far too long to get to its current form.
Worth noting that it was the construction industry that wanted this national card accreditation scheme.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Even though we have level 3 cards for our emplyees because they do not have supervisor in the title most sites wont allow them on.
Also i am in the same position as that H&S Preactitioner, i have a HNC, NEBOSH Cert, CMI Diploma in Mannagment all of which are the same level or above a NVQ L4 (accoring to the NQF). I have also working in construction for 10 years but because my qulifications are academic i cant have a mangment card!
the H&S test have to be re-sat when applying for a course unless its been passed within the last 2 years....a defo money making scam!
At the minute i only have a basic site skills card due to the problem above and me refusing to do an NVQ L3. I was refused access to site by some snotty little graduate recently and i was fuming!
If the system asked the people who it effects how to improve it i am sure it would be much better. the problem is it is run by people who have a nice job behind a desk in a suit and not been on site for years!
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Would you not agree that it takes the so-called "cow-boys" out of the industry, or at least reduces the number of them?? We put all our employees through the scheme not to "learn" from directly, but to prove their ability. Although the H&S test allows them to get a Labourer card, that card is quite limiting and not an Operative card designed for particular trades. Employees must achieve certain NVQ's in order to achieve any card higher than a labourer card. Maybe it is down to the site agents to be more "particular" who they allow to carry out certain jobs on site. That said, I do think there is an element of "jobs for the boys".
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
CSCS Card.
Here we go again!
The comments above refer to the "touch screen" test and stop there.
I am no great fan of the scheme and do wonder what useful purpose it does serve.
However the TST is just the start for any candidate in applying for a card.
"Competence" now means, if my memory serves me right, possession of an NVQ. (That should start another ball rolling).
Rodger Ker
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
wturner,
i think that the system is designed to elminiate the cow-boys however i dont think it is doing very well, it is how ever creating lots of hastle for the honest companies.
from putting all our engineers through the NVQ process an assessor came in twice and sat in the board room where they collated worksheets (produced when doing work on site). there was no site based assessment and the worksheets could have quite easly been made up.
I asked the NVQ assessor why this was so easy and his reply was........"These lads have beening doing this for a living for a while and the company wouldnt employ them if they werent good lads"
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Yes, the scheme for Chartered Practitioners was flawed for a while. However, this has now changed and member who are members of a chartered recognised profession can obtain a management card.
Overall, I still think it is a positive move for the industry.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Freelance Safety,
It is not just flawed for professionals but also for people who have vast amounts of experience but little to no qualifications.
It will be a positive move for the industry providing that they get it right however at the moment this is not happening.
Again from my understanding the rule are set from upon high by people who have spent little to no time on a site let alone running the operational side of a company.
if they created a working group of people from tradesmen to operational managers / construction managers to recognize and solve the problems I believe if would be a good system.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Andyc1603,
Makes you wonder why people bother with the scheme at all. I guess no matter what systems are implemented there will always be cow-boys, whether that be cowboy builders or cowboy assessors.
My experience of assessors have been quite good.
Off-course the site agents only demand the cards when there is time. When the job needs to be done NOW the cards seem to be.....forgotten. That's the one that really gets up my ...
I particularly like "the company wouldnt employ them if they werent good lads".... If only it was that easy!
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
I am afraid that if you want to work for the Main contractors group then this system has to be followed.
they are all good lads....at the interview stage anyway!
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
The CSCS scheme is also a bedfellow of NVQs. meaning that skilled labourers with city and guilds cannot get the card they a qualified for only a basic or trainee?
Also I had to argue to get a H&S professional card becuase i didnt have an NVQ level 4, I have a degree.
So its good in theory but its in no way independent and should be scrapped in favour of a faiere and better system
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Spelling mistake central there....
*because
and
*fairer
Its friday!
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
My penny's worth...the CSCS scheme does little to enhance site safety, probably not much more than a site induction for most operatives. It certainly does not get rid of the cowboys! Maybe the CPCS for those operating plant is more constructive, but at £1700 for an excavator operator it should be. Then there is the bureaucracy with obtaining a card. Finally, there is more than one so-called safety system in the industry which causes not but confusion. Scrap the lot and start again, we can do better than this.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
I do agree with the card in some respects. It highlights the facts that an NVQ in a trade or management has been achieved. The touch screen test is of no benefit for anyone as somebody said earlier a site induction, toolbox talks and training such as working at height, SMSTS etc provide much more beneficial information. With regards to removing the cowboys "Not A Chance of it, while it is existence" Those that ask for cards are public sector, architects, principal contractors etc. Most of them are professionals with a construction background and have taken some form of rigorous training in their fields of expertise. Others that may ask is because they are told to but do not know what the cards are for. What of those that really nead protection such as domestic clients who have no knowledge of construction? I can't see the cowboy saying check my CSCS card i'm competent. The card also says I can do a job but not how well. I am sorry but the CSCS card does not achieve a gold star. Might as well show the employer your certificates.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Probably now has the same credibility as CHAS and related organisational competence schemes
Bob
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
I have several engineers registered with the CSCS card, experienced worker etc. I need to get 2 engineers cards operative labourer (green) without NVQ's. Talk to CSCS and it is not an issue, but send the form off and it will be returned as no NVQ registered. The CSCS website gives a list of trades available for industry accreditation, non of which are now available. Anybody know how to get around it, or just keep pulling hair out?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
CSCS and CPCS carding system was good in theory, but bad in practice. Brought in by MCG. Only available if you pay out loads of money, NVQ and testing at approved sites only, return from CITB less than ever paid out, supposedly run by a charity, the CITB. Now that it is in CDM it makes a requirement to gain entry to site.
pilot150 register and apply for site visitor card and take PQP test, will only work for short while due to above.
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.