Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
T-Bone  
#1 Posted : 05 October 2010 21:44:00(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
T-Bone

The nature of our product means we use temporary walkways / bridges in place at various stages to prevent falls from height during a build process (boat building) Historically we have made these ourselves from wood but we are now getting that little bit more professional and having them made up from aluminium. Do these need to be certificated to a load bearing strength as per mezzanine floors etc. The company who are making them up have asked us if it is something we would like (at considerable cost) along with annual checks of welds etc I can understand the reasoning & it seems a best practice but is it a necessity? As usual any help would be appreciated
Darach  
#2 Posted : 05 October 2010 22:11:27(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Darach

As with any temporary structure (like scaffolding), my opinion would be that it should have a load bearing capacity stated on it. If not it should at least be known by whoever is charged with erecting the structure or policing the safe use, or loading of the structure. The first question that I would ask in the event of a collapse or failure of a weld etc. would be; was the structure fit for the purpose intended?
David Bannister  
#3 Posted : 06 October 2010 10:42:08(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
David Bannister

T-Bone, taking the broader risk management view, as Darach suggests, may lead you to consider how you would be able to verify that you had provided safe access and a safe working place etc if challenged post-event. Simply saying "it was built from welded metal and looked OK" is likely to lead to some probing follow-up questions and lack of convincing answers. If these structures are for long term use and subsequent reuse then the financial argument becomes less significant.
Andyc1603  
#4 Posted : 06 October 2010 11:33:09(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Andyc1603

Hey All, I do not believe that there is any regulations that say it has to be tested etc however you should be able to supply engineering calculations as evidence that the platform is fit for use. we have designed platforms in the past and the way i have always gone about it is to veiw the area of the walk way (how many people can be on it at once). Use the standard for a persons weight which i believe is 80kg and ensure that the walk way can hold the weight safley (i would also include a factor of safety). i hope this helps.
Andyc1603  
#5 Posted : 06 October 2010 11:53:38(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
Andyc1603

Forgot also to mention the walkways should be handrailed etc (I would suggest two rails using the scaffold spacing which off the top of my head is about 450mm and 980mm or there abouts) this is to ensure the risk of a person falling is minimized.
PhilBeale  
#6 Posted : 06 October 2010 17:21:52(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
PhilBeale

T-bone is this structure going to be installed in one position permanently fixed or is it going to be designed to be dismantled and moved around. i would have thought if it was a fixed structure then engineering calculations would be suitable the same with any walkway. unless it is designed an built in Delhi then it will collapse before anyone goes near it;-) Phil
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.