Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Evans37982  
#1 Posted : 12 October 2010 08:58:29(UTC)
Rank: New forum user
Evans37982

HI all I have been asked by a friend who have an intruder alarm business to provide health and safety advice. They employ less than five people however they still complete all the documents required to go and work as contractors for larger companies such as Risk assessments, method statements, health and safety policy. They are chasing a contract at the moment whereby the site wants my friends company to have somebody (me) to be named on the health and safety policy as someone who is qualified to give health and safety advice, help write method statements and risk assessments. I am Tech Iosh with 8 years health and safety experience. I am currently studying level 6 diploma. I have a full time job, so I am really not interested as pursuing this as a financial venture, just to help a friend out. However I know if we were to employ a health and safety consultant we would demand that they have professional indemnity insurance. Could anybody tell me what my obligations and liabilities would be with giving this informal advice?
Safety Smurf  
#2 Posted : 12 October 2010 09:26:19(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Safety Smurf

Hi Evans, I would say that if your friend wants to cite you as the person giving H&S advice then its not informal.
PhilBeale  
#3 Posted : 12 October 2010 09:31:12(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
PhilBeale

The trouble is if you are not actually carrying out the assessments but they are using your name as being responsible for health and safety for the comopany and both your not do the work and not receiving a salary but all be a bit dubious to me. If an accident did occur then you could be potentially be in court as you are the named person for H&S for that company, I think it would be difficult to explain how you are named but don't actually carry out any of the assessments or over seem them in anyway. Why can't they name someone who already works at the company, assuming there RA MS would be seen to be suitable then there shouldn't be an issue.The larger company may just what an initial point of contact if there is any H&S questions or issues they have. If you aren't and don't work at the company then they will look dishonest and will do them more harm than good in the long run. Get one of their employees on a training course. Phil
Evans37982  
#4 Posted : 12 October 2010 09:44:48(UTC)
Rank: New forum user
Evans37982

Thanks Safety smurf and Phil. Ok in order to complete the work I would need to check all the assessments that they have, complete the method statements on an ongoing basis and complete any work as necessary. I will check out the health and safety policy thoroughly. I have checked out some insurance for consultancy work and the premiums are around £500. Again if I am not doing this work regurlarly the cost of the premium is unsustainable. The problem they have is that they do not have anyone at the company with qualifications that are required by the site, hence why they have asked me. Are you are aware of any consultant giving advice without indeminity insurance. Thanks
holmezy  
#5 Posted : 12 October 2010 09:47:24(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
holmezy

Evans, the requirement is to have "access to competent H+S advice". Where your mate gets it from is up to him. There doesnt have to be a contract, nor any reward ie money. It is always favourable to have an internal source ie employee but obviously consultancy's provide a service also. Ultimately the responsible person will be your mate as he is the "controlling mind". You could name your mate as the "responsible person" and you could be named as a "competent source of advice". So long as your advice is within your competency and is sound, then you should be OK. Professional indemnity insurance would be nice to have, but seems an excessive cost in this case. My take on it, others may differ! Holmezy
Heather Collins  
#6 Posted : 12 October 2010 10:04:05(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Heather Collins

This is a difficult one as you have to applaud the fact that your friend is even thinking about getting competent advice for such a small company. I have come across a fair few who don't bother. Your friend's obligation here is to obtain the competent advice as holmezy says. The issue comes if say - your friend's company were to be sued and there was any question about the correctness of advice you had given them. Your friend's insurers would almost certainly want to pursue YOU for a share of the costs. If you have no insurance to cover this then you are personally liable for the costs. This is why we consultants have indemnity insurance and yes it's not cheap! At the very least I would strongly advise that you do not put your name on the policy or any other documentation. One thought that does occur to me - could your friend actually put you on his books as an employee? Then the indemnity insurance question would not arise. I have no idea of the practicality of this as I am not an employment expert, but I know a company I used to work for did this with the agreement of their insurers for ex-employees who came back for short-term consultancy contracts.
Evans37982  
#7 Posted : 12 October 2010 10:19:13(UTC)
Rank: New forum user
Evans37982

Thanks very much for your advice, heather, holmezy. Your comments make great sense. I think for this it is either all or nothing. I will speak with him and try to persuade him to attend a suitable course. In the meantime I will offer him assistance for the completion of his documents i.e. "you might want to consider this" etc. I will not put my name to documents etc, as I do not intend to persue indemnity insurance. Thanks again if you think I should consider anything else please let me know. :)
PhilBeale  
#8 Posted : 12 October 2010 11:21:57(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
PhilBeale

The price you have been quoted seems excessive for PI insurance i pay at least half that with public liability try Hiscox online. The company doesn't pay for the PI it would be yourself so if they employed a safety consultant they wouldn't be paying for his PI he would. Possible employing a self employed consultant already running a business may be the way to go or at least looking at getting a quote for work they would require him to do on this one project that way he could be named. It seems that you would be taking on a lot of work with no reward for yourself which is fine as it is a friend that owns the company but ultimately he will be making money from the work and so should you may be at mates rates but you should be looking at gaining something from it. Your friend company could be jumping through loops only not to be offered the work in the first place. I have a family member who is in the same position who regularly quoted for work and completes all the necessary H&S work only not to get the job. so your friend needs to be clear do they need to just provide the H&S information to get the job or are they quoting along with everyone else, which mean it could be a very expensive process if they are unlikely to get the job? Unfortunately companies want H&S documentation but aren't willing to pay the cost for small business's to put the time and effort into producing them only not to give the job at the end of the day. Phil
David Bannister  
#9 Posted : 12 October 2010 11:31:19(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
David Bannister

Evans37982, when I first read your post I thought that your friend was just wanting to use your name to put on a tender document, without actually using your as a source of competent advice. That of course is dishonest and as an IOSH member would land you in trouble with the professional ethics committee. However I have re-read (always a good thing) your request and agree with the previous postings. Your scenario does not constitute informal advice. You are obliged to give advice that is in line with IOSH professional standards. You will be liable under civil law for any errors or omissions you make. You may be subject to criminal proceedings if you get it so wrong that you come to the attention of the Enforcement Agencies. You are certainly not obliged to take out any liability insurance.
Evans37982  
#10 Posted : 12 October 2010 13:08:43(UTC)
Rank: New forum user
Evans37982

Thanks Phil I will ask him the question about whether the work is going to be his providing he can just provide the information or whether he is just one of many contractors. Your advice has been very helpful. It was worth asking the question. Stuff 4blokes thanks for your comments. I want to do things correctly hence the original question. Now I have a good idea of how to approach the request I can now let him know his options. Thanks again
son of skywalker  
#11 Posted : 12 October 2010 14:51:12(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
son of skywalker

How about getting your mate to pay for the indemnity insurance. It would be a great deal cheaper than paying for a consultant. It is the least he could do. Son of Skywalker
Evans37982  
#12 Posted : 12 October 2010 15:44:52(UTC)
Rank: New forum user
Evans37982

Thanks skywalker sounds like a reasonable request I will put it by him.
Stedman  
#13 Posted : 12 October 2010 16:04:00(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Stedman

The situation that you are in is quite simple 1. If you are named as undertaking the Regulation 7 role of H&S Assistant you are either an employee or consultant. 2. If you have two employers, then you may have a Code Point 1 conflict. 3. If you are a consultant, then you are required to have professional indemnity insurance. See Code Point 16 of the Code of Practice. 4. In addition to professional indemnity insurance you will also require run off insurance for another six year (c £3000+). 5. With intruder alarms I also smell a serious risk of asbestos liability! Is the additional income worth the risk and additional cost?
Evans37982  
#14 Posted : 12 October 2010 16:31:49(UTC)
Rank: New forum user
Evans37982

Hi Stedman I have printed out the documents now from the website. I will read these in depth. Call it naive but I never knew "consultancy" "advice" could be so involved. This is of course not a problem if you are a direct employee of a company, however I understand that controls must be in place. As I am employed by a company and do not want to go the solo route, the costs you have mentioned would certainly be prohibitive. It is likely that although I feel I could offer good health and safety advice to my friend it would be much easier for him (and less of a headache for me) to go to an established consultant with all the insurances in place. Thanks for the information
Clairel  
#15 Posted : 12 October 2010 18:01:52(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Clairel

I wouldn't.
Clairel  
#16 Posted : 12 October 2010 18:02:56(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Clairel

Clairel wrote:
I wouldn't.
I should clarify - I wouldn't without the relevant insurance.
multuminparvo  
#17 Posted : 13 October 2010 20:08:52(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
multuminparvo

I am employed as an advisor to a Local Authority which includes schools. For those that don’t know LA maintained schools have varying governance. Foundation and Voluntary Aided schools are autonomous employers to the LA. Do I provide competent advice to such schools? – No! Why? Well Zurich Municipal indicated on enquiry about my requiring Prof. Indemnity Insurance that if I provided advice for no benefit then no insurance would be necessary. Sounds simple but I am paid by the Council and cannot work for a 3rd party employer. I am not a Consultant. These schools have not bought my services back in; if they had my employers Employer Liability Insurance would cover. I can only advise that an enquiry to the British Insurers Association or the likes of ZM is sought.
pete48  
#18 Posted : 13 October 2010 20:54:03(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
pete48

Evans, it makes no difference whether a professional person provides advice for a fee, for benefits in kind, or free of charge – they still have a duty of care to their client. They are therefore exposed to potential liabilities and may be sued for negligence. In your case you would be providing professional advice to your pal for free. I would consider asking your friend to talk to his P.I. insurers. He is instructing you and should understand the responsibilities you have and should be asked to provide cover/protection on your behalf, maybe by simply extending his PI to cover your limited activity within his company.(i.e only to cover the advice you give him) That way he gets the advice he obviously respects and you are neither left uninsured nor out of pocket, p48
offaman  
#19 Posted : 13 October 2010 21:26:55(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
offaman

Hi Evans, You could consider a different approach which would be to talk your friend through the process to give some structure to the risk management process he needs to go through. Its generally accepted that those that do the work have the best understanding of the hazards and risks that arise from the work they do and it sounds like he is on the ball and cares about his workmates which is a good start. While the point about indemnity is important lets bear in mind that consultants have been prosecuted for giving bad advice e.g. (George Farr (Quarries) Ltd) so its not the whole story. I think that the main point is whether you believe yourself to be able to provide effective help that will make a difference. Another point I think relevant is that there is currently no framework to regulate consultants so had he not asked you he could potentially have got expensive advice from someone without the levels of experience that you possess, Regards, Paul.
RayRapp  
#20 Posted : 14 October 2010 08:57:51(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
RayRapp

There was a similar thread to this recently. I have provided advice in the past to social and sports clubs that I am a member, without charge and not signed my name to anything. I do not see any problem with this. Better they get some proper advice than try and go it alone. Furthermore, I have also provided advice to friends, usually informally ie in the pub, not charged and not signed my name to anything - job done. I find that others are advocating a more conservative approach which includes PLI. I think this is OTT and although consultants can be prosecuted or held liable for h&s advice, these types of cases are very rare and only for the most negligent of advice. Dare I say it, but there is a need to be sensible here...
Canopener  
#21 Posted : 14 October 2010 09:27:40(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
Canopener

Some interesting answers, which in the main I agree with. But to clarify the point made at #5, the 'requirement' of the 'management regs' (reg 7) is not simply to have ACCESS to advice but to APPOINT one or more competent persons. Otherwise, arguably every employer could simply state that they have access to competent advice from the HSE infoline!!!! I will await the retorts to that one!! You can of course be the appointed competent person, and you can give advice, without having to carry out the risk assessments, or 'put your name to anything' (other than your advice!).
firesafety101  
#22 Posted : 14 October 2010 09:55:17(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
firesafety101

Health and safety on the cheap. This is what all contractors would like but most decide to pay the going rate. PI insurance is essential, whether on the books using the company's or you pay it yourself. You want to help your friend out but don't want to pay out? It is your name on the documents so you are responsible for your input. By all means do the work for free but take care of yourself. We'd all like to work without cost to ourselves but this is the real world. If your friend was a real friend he wouldn't put you in this position in the first place?
Users browsing this topic
Guest (2)
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.