Welcome Guest! The IOSH forums are a free resource to both members and non-members. Login or register to use them

Postings made by forum users are personal opinions. IOSH is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any of the information contained in forum postings. Please carefully consider any advice you receive.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
pete48  
#1 Posted : 21 October 2010 19:46:49(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
pete48

This report has generated pages and pages of "you don't wanna do it that way" on several topic threads on all the forums. But that's the easy bit> What do folk think should have been in there. I am not asking about the detail or supporting evidence, just opinions. ( I know, I know:) ) Maybe for example: -a line or two about discussing with the Press Complaints Council, BBC Trust or whatever, whichever bodies are involved with standards within media circles? -discussion to look at how the media might help in this change process or at least not railroad it. p48
chris.packham  
#2 Posted : 21 October 2010 21:27:16(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
chris.packham

How about a simple check list for the manager (particularly of a SME) so that when evaluating the competence of a prospective consultany they can ask the right questions and ensure that they obtain relevant information? This could include qualifications, but also track record, references from existing clients, etc. Chris
stephenjs  
#3 Posted : 22 October 2010 15:02:34(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
stephenjs

I would want a proper qualification, experience and knowledge based education, like solicitors, barristers etc for qualified H&S peronnel, That would get rid of all the fly by nights, three minute experts and have a go jacks. Stephen
NigelB  
#4 Posted : 22 October 2010 19:53:09(UTC)
Rank: Forum user
NigelB

Pete Yes, why not have a go? David Young's report highlights the manipulation of stories to certain editors distorted opinions of health and safety. IOSH - and its members -will have plenty of examples. These could be tied up into a dossier and taken to the Press Complaints Commission, using the section on 'Accuracy' as the criteria against which to reflect the inaccuracy of the stories. They may reject a dossier but it seems like an idea worth trying. David Young certainly has shown no interest in doing so. So there may be two routes: 1 Take a complaint to the PCC that certain newspapers - we know the names!! - have consistently and deliberately published 'inaccurate, misleading or distorted information' [Taken from the PCC Editors Code of Practice] in breach of the Editors Code. 2 Take all the evidence which highlights the benefits of a good health and safety management system [plenty around] which David Young ignored and use it to start 2011 with a drive on how health and safety specialists - including consultants on and off the register - are preventing death, injuries and ill health and making business more efficient, more profitable and be sustained in the future. Cheers. Nigel
johnmurray  
#5 Posted : 23 October 2010 09:01:36(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
johnmurray

Not forgetting unions and their reps. Sad, but true. Unionised workplaces are safer !
johnmurray  
#6 Posted : 23 October 2010 09:08:23(UTC)
Rank: Super forum user
johnmurray

Although I suspect that Lord Young of Graffham may well not be interested in anything to do with unions. http://en.wikipedia.org/..._Baron_Young_of_Graffham
Users browsing this topic
Guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.