IOSH forums home
»
Our public forums
»
OSH discussion forum
»
Asbestos -Dangerous Occurence access and egress
Rank: New forum user
|
Does access and egress constitute a notifiable dangerous occurence and does anybody have any suitable case law that would answer the following scenario?
My org works as a subcontractor for a large organisation that leases space for their equipment in third party premises. Landlords have not always provided asbestos surveys and the stance of our client is that the onus is on the subcontractors through asbestos awareness training to request a survey if none is available and invasive work is to be undertaken or there is damage to what may or may not contain asbestos.
Apart from contradicting the presumptive approach I find this reactive approach, failing to do a suitable and sufficient risk assessment, share adequate information and putting the onus on the contractor who may have an awareness but no expertise contrary to the ethos of the legislation; even tresspassers have rights!
Has anyone else come across this scenario and how do you manage it?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
The simple answer to your query is that 'someone' needs to make an assessment of asbestos risk before works proceed and that person needs to be competent to do so.
The assessment could be purely visual, although it is likely that some sampling would be needed and of course in certain cases a fully invasive survey will be required.
There is nothing wrong with the client asking the sub-contractor to do this, so long as you are competent to do so or it is clear that you may employ a competent consultant to carry out the survey/inspection on your behalf.
Awareness training does not make you competent for this kind of assessment, and of course it should not wait until trades are on site, nor rely on them to spot things as they go.
Ultimate responsibility lies with the client to ensure that the contractors they employ to do these works are competent in all aspects of the works, not least asbestos.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
If the access or egress involves the physical disturbance of asbestos containing material thereby resulting in control measures being exceeded then this does constitute a breach, whether it is a notifiable dangerous occurrence, I'm not so sure. RIDDOR refers to a reportable disease (i.e. asbestos related illness). Given the long latency of asbestos related illness it is unlikely to be reportable in the short term unless there are other mitigating factors that consitute it being deemed a dangerous occurrence.
The resposibility lies with whoever is deemed the duty holder for the premises. Given your scenario the answer does not seem obvious as to who that may be. Further investigation regarding the leasing agreement for the premises may be required.
In any case, asbestos awareness training does not and never should give anyone the right to 'request a survey'. The building or premises must have undergone a survey, occupied or not. This is the law (Reg 4 CAR 2006). Asbestos awareness training merely augments the duty to manage not vice versa.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
On the Dangerous Occurrence question, the answer is no.
On the dutyholder obligation side of things:
Regulation 5 and para 49 of the L143 CAR 06 ACoP also refers.
"As part of the management plan required by regulation 4, occupiers or
owners of premises have an obligation to inform any person liable to disturb
ACMs, including maintenance workers, about the presence and condition of such
materials."
Someone has to approach the Client and point out the error of his ways.
|
|
|
|
Rank: New forum user
|
Thanks for your thoughts folks. Reg 4 says there is a duty to manage, there is not a duty to survey which leaves it still a little woolly.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
You are right, there is no duty to survey. A duty to manage means exactly that and ACMs can only be effectively managed by carrying out a survey. It goes without saying that the survey must be carried out to an acceptable level. That doesn't always happen though. But it still does not devolve resposibility from not doing a survey at all.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
I am afraid yoiur client is running very close to the wind with the presumptive attitude that the subcontractor takes the risks. If they are renting the space the duty to manage falls directly back onto the as the Person in Control of premises by virtue of lease, rental agreement, contract or other similar mechanisms. You need your directors to start a conversation about this, I can recommend a training provider who does do an Asbestos - The Business Case for Directors if you need it. Whatever if you do take over an area the duty will fall to yourselves if you take full control for any period.
The HSE are als becoming increasingly unhappy at requests for "Emergency Work" and forcing the compliance with the 14 days whenever possible.
Bob
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Try Reg 5:
5. An employer shall not undertake work in demolition, maintenance, or any other work which exposes or is liable to expose his employees to asbestos in respect of any premises unless either—
(a)he has carried out a suitable and sufficient assessment as to whether asbestos, what type of asbestos, contained in what material and in what condition is present or is liable to be present in those premises; or
(b)if there is doubt as to whether asbestos is present in those premises he—
(i)assumes that asbestos is present, and that it is not chrysotile alone, and
(ii)observes the applicable provisions of these Regulations.
That means; do a survey or do the work under fully controlled conditions.
Could that apply to you?
Paul.
|
|
|
|
IOSH forums home
»
Our public forums
»
OSH discussion forum
»
Asbestos -Dangerous Occurence access and egress
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.