Rank: Forum user
|
We have a number of service engineers who attend remote sites on a 24/7 basis. We can be on site for more than 4 hours. Some sites are manned in the daytime and therefore we have access to their toilet and washing facilities. What are our obligations as regards welfare facilities where they are not available? The site which has become an issue is a large site and therefore we spend more time there than other smaller sites, however if we supply facilities here will we be setting a precedence for smaller sites? Also, what are our client's obligations to supply welfare facilities? Regards Mike
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
What's the nature of the work, Mike? What is it your guys are servicing?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
HSE would I'm sure look for you to provide as an absolute minimum drinking water and washing facilities (not hard to make hot water available in a van for example), with use of nearest available "public" toilet facilities.(HSE Guidance refers -check their website under "welfare"). I guess my next question has to be: how do your people access the site?
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
I'm also having similar problems with this issue. We have staff who carry out repair and replacement works in domestic premises. We have no problems when facilities are in place, but when they aren't in place the current policy is to give the workers time to get to a "public" toilet.
Having looked through CDM and Workplace Regs & guidance, im struggling to find something that gives more info.
Would also appreciate links to anything someone has previously used.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
INDG 293 refers. e.g. "Use of public toilets and washing facilities should be a last resort and not used just because they are the cheaper option. This would not be acceptable where the provision of better facilities would be reasonably practicable."
|
|
|
|
Rank: Forum user
|
Looks like this is a common problem. We are not under CDM nut Welfare Regs still apply. This is ok for permanent sites but the poor old mobile workers tend to be overlooked. We all know what should be provided but when it comes to the practicalities that is another thing. Toilets: can we use the local (24 hour) supermarket, What if its over 10 minutes away. Washing facilities: can we use hand wipes? I read a 'railways guidance that says - No! Rest facilities : in the van? Facilities for food: local supermarket? Drinking water: bottled water?? I would welcome any practical alternatives. We have 200+ sites and its not practical to install and maintain welfare facilities on each one.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Hi HSE have produced a useful leaflet on "Provision of Welfare facilities at transient construction sites" - CIS 46. It sets out a number of options which are sensible whilst taking account of the nature of the work.
PH2
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
HSE have been quite insistent on provision of hot water in works vehicles -reasonable practicabilty argument - for construction, grounds maintenance, waste and recycling etc.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
It's difficult to know what your kind of work or work situation is from what you have posted, but I suggest a pragmatic approach to each of the sites and issues on a case by case basis. There are many 'mobile' workers who have similar welfare needs that are not normally in the main insurmountable with a little thought. Refuse collection crews are one example. They do have sinks attached to the vehicle, they take their own drinks with them (I don't believe that the employer needs to be buying them bottled water!) or stop at a roadside cafe/van thing or a shop and they use toilets as and where they can find them. They rest (or do they?!) in the cab or in good weather at a roadside stop when having a cuppa. I don't think that the HSE would expect anything much more than a reasonable, pragmatic approach based on the circumstances.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
michaelt wrote:Looks like this is a common problem. We are not under CDM nut Welfare Regs still apply.
Michael
A bit of a sweeping statement as the old CHSWR are in the CDM07 regs
These issues really need to be resolved in the Service Contract - it is all a bit late now. Could your Directoors talk to the clients re this issue as the security/gate staff must have welfare provision
Bob
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
You could try looking at the conditions for truck drivers, the ultimate "mobile worker". Cabs with beds but nothing else. Laybys for toilets, and not even the facility to stop at a designated "truck stop". Given the need to keep the trucks moving, and the rather rigid (and legally necessary) requirements for stops. Their employer, and the government, feels no need to provide much at all.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
You will have to consider their driving time as well under the domestic driving hours, they can only work and drive a max of 10 hours a day
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
It's nine hours, it can be up to ten hours twice a week.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
It's nine hours, it can be up to ten hours twice a week if they drive LGV vehicles then they come under the drivers hours, Van drivers 3500KG and under come under domestic driving regulations
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
But since their employers insist that they stick to driving as much as they can, and increasingly to set routes (and fitted with trackers), they do not have facilities to use. And they're mobile workers !
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Try googling 'tealwash' to see how washing facilities can be incorporated into vans.
However, I would wish to see a risk assessment to establish if hand washing is really necessary. If they are working on generators the provision of suitable gloves might be sufficient to keep hands adequately clean and eliminate the need for hand washing. I keep single-use nitrile gloves in my car and, having changed a wheel recently, had no need to wash hands. In many cases simple wipes would probably suffice.
Chris
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
Most mechs have another name for nitrile gloves, it involves replacing the "N" with "SH". When they get lubricant on them (even water) they rapidly become slippery. I recommend the "rubberised" fabric gloves. You can hire "mobile welfare facilities", basically a loo and canteen in-a-van. Just a thought.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
I would not recommend the 'rubberised' fabric gloves for protection against liquid chemicals. When the coating is applied there is always a risk that fibres from the fabric will stretch up into the coating. The result is that the pathway for permeation breakthrough can be extremely short, resulting in the chemical starting to saturate the fibre material. This can result in skin exposure within a very short time. In any event, 'rubber', in the form of natural rubber latex is not suitable for use with most of the chemicals that mechanics will be using. Nitrile performs well with some, but not with all. For example, permeation breakthrough time with petrol will be extremely short, with some very thin (0.1mm) single-use nitrile gloves I have measured this in about 20 seconds.
In any even, gloves used with liquid chemicals that represent a skin hazard should always be category III. Most of the thin, single-use nitrile gloves will be category I and thus not really suitable. Look for the appropriate symbol on the glove.
Chris
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
I'm quite sure you are correct. But getting someone who has to work with slippery-stuff and hold onto small things AND work, to wear something that makes life a lot harder, is hard work. I have in mind a simple job on an st24 ford that eventually became a top stripdown because a threaded attacher (bolt) got lost in the works.......and it was not "billable"....exit nitrile gloves and back to skin.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Super forum user
|
John
To some extent it depends upon which nitrile gloves you are wearing. Some have a textured surface that provides better grip that the cheaper versions.
However, going back to the original posting, the main concern in providing gloves would be to prevent physical soiling of the skin necessitating some form of hand washing. For this purpose almost any glove that prevents the dirt getting to the skin will do.
Protection against chemical hazards is a different matter requiring a more in-depth understanding of how gloves work and fail.
Chris
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.